Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    Pentagon Does Well with Obama Budget

    By David Corn | February 26, 2009 11:45 AM




    The Defense Department is a big winner in the Obama budget unveiled on Thursday morning. The Pentagon's base budget gets a hefty $533.7 billion, up 4 percent from 2009--not a bad raise these days. And this figure excludes money for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The budget includes an additional $75 billion for "overseas contingency operations"--meaning Iraq, Afghanistan and other missions--for 2009 and $130 billion for 2010. Some House liberals had been pushing for a cut in military spending to free up money for Obama's other priorities. He didn't hear them.




    The budget overview released by the administration notes that the expanded Pentagon budget will allow Obama "to increase the size of the Army and Marine Corps, to continue to improve the medical treatment of wounded servicemembers, and to reform the acquisition process." The report boasts that the Pentagon will be "doing more" to address post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury. Which is admirable. But the do ent says nothing about cutting any big-ticket weapons programs. Such cuts could still materialize as a result of the Defense Review underway--which is supposed to identify and prioritize Pentagon goals--but for now it seems as if the Pentagon dodged a bullet.

    The Obama administration is also conducting a review of Afghanistan policy that is set to conclude at the end of March. Still, Obama has announced he will be sending 17,000 additional US troops there in the spring and the summer. I'm still wondering why the decision to deploy more troops preceded the review of what those troops should do.


    That aside, I also wonder how the ongoing review will address a crucial matter: civilian casualties in Afghanistan, many of which result from the errant bombs of US and NATO forces. The continual occurrence of civilian casualties in Afghanistan has weakened popular support for the presence of US forces in the country and has undermined the weak central government of Hamid Karzai. And the situation is not getting any better. I just came across a report released a few weeks ago by the United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan's human rights unit that notes civilian casualties increased last year:
    UNAMA Human Rights recorded a total of 2118 civilian casualties between 01 January and 31 December 2008. This figure represents an increase of almost 40% on the 1523 civilian deaths recorded in the year of 2007. The 2008 civilian death toll is thus the highest of any year since the end of major hostilities which resulted in the demise of the Taliban regime at the end of 2001.
    The report says that about 40 percent of these deaths was caused by pro-government forces and that this
    amounts to a 31% increase over the deaths recorded in 2007. This increase occurred notwithstanding various measures introduced by the [US/NATO forces] to reduce the impact of the war on civilians.
    The review ought to take this into account.

  2. #2
    keep asking questions George Gervin's Afro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    11,409
    Sean hannity and Hush have been stating that Obama wants to decimate our military with his budget cuts?...That's wierd.

  3. #3
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    I hate when there's conflicting information out there.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/busin...dChannel=10448



    LOSERS

    * DEFENSE SPENDING. The budget projects costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars of just over $140 billion this year and $130 billion in the 2010 fiscal year that begins October 1, 2009. Annual costs will drop after that to $50 billion annually.

  4. #4
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    I hate when there's conflicting information out there.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/busin...dChannel=10448
    Weak. What conflict?

    "Costs are forecast to drop..."


    We're withdrawing from Iraq...do the math.

  5. #5
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    If you want to argue that the rise in spending doesn't cut it, fine, but that's much different from claiming Obama cut spending.

  6. #6
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    462
    Takes money to put down the upcoming civil unrest.

  7. #7
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    Takes money to put down the upcoming civil unrest.
    They'll need a few stormtroopers. Sounds like you're pretty focused on it. Have you considered signing up?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •