The only game I can think of that the absence of Nash might have made a positive difference was the Celtics game a week ago when Rondo raped us. Other than that, I'd much much rather have Nash in the lineup.
And how often do you see Shaq standing near the basket while the opposing center has a wide open jumpshot?
The only game I can think of that the absence of Nash might have made a positive difference was the Celtics game a week ago when Rondo raped us. Other than that, I'd much much rather have Nash in the lineup.
What people forget is that Rondo destroyed Billups the next night in Denver.
Actually, I didn't even know that. That's good to know.
Wouldn't go that far....
He's definitely not the answer to winning a championship, but he's not kryptonite either.
Can you please remove Nash's balls from your mouth, I'm really getting tired of hearing the Nash T-baggers who didn't watch basketball prior to 2004 pretending they know something about something.
All the time, and if he stepped out to defend the pick and pop, the opposing PG would have a wide open layup because Nash made the wrong decision on whether to go over or under the pick.
Contrary to what the say on planetorange.net or what Tom Leander says during games, charges drawn is a worthless stat. It only further adds to my point that Nash is more worried about getting back on offense than stopping the other team on defense.
Perfect example of why I said what I said,
http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=290304014
If you watch the games closely you will see why Shaq stays in foul trouble. It's all about Nash not stopping any penetration.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)