Reply With Quote
@ this thread
You didn't even know the cap hit when you started your rant...probably should've started there at least...
and downhill from there...
it's also funny how stretch's gay man-crush Donovan McNabb got absolutely roasted by TO plenty of times (especially when he outed McNabb as a choker who dry heaved at the end of the Super Bowl), yet he's still defending that son of a .
You didn't even know the cap hit when you started your rant...probably should've started there at least...
and downhill from there...
LMAO mma
You didn't even know the cap hit when you started your rant...probably should've started there at least...
and downhill from there...
shaq >>>>>>>>>>>> bj penn, or whatever that s name is
I never made any attempt to hide the fact that I've hated TO for the better part of his career, not only for the volumes of team problems, drama and controversy he's brought with him, through his complete inability to put team goals above personal goals, but also for being second in the entire league in dropped passes and committing numerous bonehead plays this season when one more victory puts the team into the playoffs.
I really find it humorous that you are asking for proof that TO is a team cancer when you paraded in that bull about Bobby Carpenter as an alternative explanation.
LMAO @ mono talking about a gay man-crush when he fantasizes about sucking tom bradys on an hourly basis, and cried like a got when he got his ass kicked both against the colts in 06, then in the superbowl in 07.
I never said it was true. I simply said something else I heard, and left it at that. If you notice, not again, did i ever mention anything about it, as there is no actual proof, just like there is no proof that TO had done anything to destory the lockerroom as is suggested.I really find it humorous that you are asking for proof that TO is a team cancer when you paraded in that bull about Bobby Carpenter as an alternative explanation.
again, there is no reason shown to believe that TO was a major problem, or that cutting him solved any major problems. all i see are some small flaws he has here and there, and your personal dislike for him. however, to simply point out his flaws and say thats why he should have been cut, is ing re ed. i could pull up a load of flaws tony romo has, and say he should be cut for those. however, there is no hiding that his positives clearly out-weigh his negatives. same can be said for TO (from a non-biased standpoint). however, one thing can be said... TO's flaws have never cost his team a playoff game. romo's have.
kinda like you did on the quincy issue, hypocrite.
The only way DallASS, will ever get another championship in any sport is to get rid of the ty owners up there in flatland, starting with Jerry 'Asshole' Jones and Mark 'The ' Cuban.
Spurs coach Pop and owner Peter Holt, OWN little Markie!
It amazes me even today that both of them nitwit's ever became billionaires. They come across more as idiots in an insane asylum!
you're a ing dumb .
You know, you're right. When one refuses to look at his history with San Francisco, Philly and Dallas, the hundreds of stories about it, the deterioration of the team's unity the more time he spends on it, and the dissention that quickly enveloped Valley Ranch following the team rewarding TO for not being a disruption last year that resulted in a 13 win super bowl favorite failing to make the playoffs.
Even refusing to look at that, I'll put his performance, or lack thereof, in any meaningful way to the team, coupled with the hindrance to the development of other talented receivers on the team that his presence causes as good enough reasons to want him gone. There was certainly no way that the relationship was suddenly going to change direction considering the downturn it took once the Cowboys no longer had a contract to hold over his head to keep him in line. Then again, I've been a fan of the Cowboys for nearly 40 years so I actually give a rat's ass what happens to the team, and there ain't a single member of the team that's above that. You as a Raiders fan probably don't understand that, which is why your team continues to have big name players and double digit losses virtually every year.
Time will tell if TO's departure was a big factor. If Romo's numbers go up and Garrett's offense suddenly looks good is that going to be evidence enough for you?
"non-biased"
Who dropped the touchdown pass in the third quarter of the playoff game against the Giants that forced the Cowboys to settle for a field goal in a game that ended with the Cowboys in easy field goal range that they lost by 4 points? Hmmm....
Last edited by Obstructed_View; 03-09-2009 at 08:01 PM.
Odd reply...
You're really getting torched in this thread...great stuff.
Ouuuhhh, lil' stretchie_wretchie, the Idiotic, Moronic, Imbecilic, Ignoramus, sounds so tuff when the little girlieboy talks dirty.
BTW, dip , little DallASS is known to be the capital of shemales so you shouldn't have any trouble getting a date with someone just like you! But, who would be the male?
ROTFLMAO@U
Great logic. I'm blown away.
And if it goes to , idiots like you will still find a way to discredit TO and his positive affect on this offense. However, I have a hard time believing they will be running the same scheme again. If they do, it will be yet another big ing mistake.
Who dropped the snap for a FG that would have won the game for the Cowboys? Who quarterbacked 8 mediocre-to- ty quarters of playoff football? Who dropped an easy pass in the 4th quarter, only to follow it up by stopping running on a route that he would have been wide open on for a TD in the endzone? Who tried returning a kick he had no business returning and fumbled in his own red zone?
Hint: None of them were TO.
Coming from the biggest obsessor on spurstalk, trying to pull information on mono's iden y, and being completely ing obsessed with spursdynasty (since you claim its not you).
And to TO's credit, after both Cowboy playoff losses, he didn't once accuse his quarterback of being gay, or throw anybody under the bus for getting tired. I guess that got played out.
True. Since you deleted the other paragraph and a half of logic and only chose to address the insult, it's clear that you are hugely overmatched.
I'm not quite sure I understand: If the scheme is so bad, and if team chemistry is rotten, why does it matter if TO is on the team or not?
Ah, so now you start talking about team accomplishments when it's time to attempt to absolve one guy of blame, but again you miss the point whether you meant to or not. You said that none of TO's flaws ever cost his team a playoff game. As with all of your arguments of this topic, you fail once again.
I'm not building up Romo at all. In fact, I was clearly in favor of ridding him of his last excuse for failing. Since you clearly hate Romo more than I hate TO it seems like you'd be excited for the upcoming proof that he's as bad as you've always said. Somehow it comes across as bluster now that TO's gone.
Because the rest of what you said was ing re ed. Of all the things that went bad, TO gets the most blame, when in fact, he was among the smallest of problems. It's hilarious how you try to twist , saying that I am taking all blame off TO for those playoff losses, and saying that I missed the point. Fact is, TO gets hit the hardest, when in fact, he had some of the smallest hands in what went wrong with the team and their losses. He may have made mistakes, but other players made bigger and worse mistakes. But since he is "TO", he gets the majority of the blame. How the can you not tell me that Romo, Crayton, and other players/coaches mistakes, werent bigger than what TO did in those games? Get the out.
Once again, you still have not shown me a ing thing to prove that he destroyed a lockerroom, or is among the main reasons the team massively underachieved this season, or that cutting him solves a major problem. The closest things was an alleged altercation between him and Witten one day, and that he wanted to get utilized more. But fact is, altercations like that happen on every NFL team, and ALL recievers think that they need to get utilized more. In fact, again, Witten who allegedly hates TO, stuck up for him again, saying that there is nothing wrong with wanting the ball more, that all recievers do, and that its part of his desire to win, which he wishes more players on the team had.
Anyways, until you prove how he was a problem, or that cutting him solved a problem (other than getting rid of a player you dislike), I choose not to debate this topic with you. I've asked for proof numerous times, yet still never got anything. Until you do, good day sir.
BTW - I actually like Romo and tend to defend him actually. Obviously you again missed the point, in unfairly bashing him, not seeing the whole picture, much like you and others do TO.
You dumbasses trying to argue for proof that TO was a cancer and a bad locker room guy are ing stupid.
Proof? The GM and Owner of the Dallas Cowboys cut an on the field productive player that cost him $9 million against the cap. You ing think he would do that just for fun? When has he ever cut a productive player putting up those stats before? Of course they cut him because he is a pain in the ass and was playing a role in destroying the locker room. Dumbasses.
Yeah, you're right. I'm sorry I started the thread.
Yeah but this one time Jerry made a bad decision, so that means he always makes bad decisions, therefore TO is the bestest teammate in the world and we can just blame this on the new Axis Of Evil that includes The Big Bad TO-hatin' Media, Nazi Germany, and Bobby Carpenter.
hit the nail right on the head. glad to see you came around.
i'll miss owens in dallas...
he killed my skins one game i remember for sure...
but i'll still miss the drama.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
