Reply With Quote
can it be both?stiff supple
As if these ing knuckleheads don't already have a hard time recruiting. Seriously I don't have a preference for the s or flamers but I'm not stupid enough to think that their desire for a nice stiff supple meaty lubed up in their ass could possibly effect their ability to perform the job at hand. This ing starts with all these ignorant worthless god warriors who think their belief structure should apply to everyone. you. I'm ing sick and tired of being around these hypocritical god worshiping morons. We don't all have to live your life. Your belief system is centered on bigotry at the expense of a better nation. How ing noble is it to expect someone to die for you and sacrifice for you while you hold the right to strip them of their duty and livelihood over a preference. Answer: Its not noble its insecure phobic bull and we should have been passed this a long god damn time ago. you again.
I hope they were all openly gay specifically to get discharged. No one should have to live a lie.
WASHINGTON – The Army fired 11 soldiers in January for violating the military's policy that gay service members must keep their sexuality hidden, according to a Virginia congressman.
Democratic Rep. Jim Moran said he has requested monthly updates from the Pentagon on the impact of the policy until it is repealed. In a statement released on Thursday, Moran said the discharged soldiers included an intelligence collector, a military police officer, four infantry personnel, a health care specialist, a motor-transport operator and a water-treatment specialist.
So explain to me how logging or box munching rendered these people incapable of doing their jobs?
"How many more good soldiers are we willing to lose due to a bad policy that makes us less safe and secure?" asked Moran, a member of the House panel that oversees military spending.
The Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell" policy was ins uted after President Bill Clinton tried to lift the ban on gay service members in 1993. It refers to the military practice of not asking recruits their sexual orientation. In turn, service members are banned from saying they are gay or bisexual, engaging in sexual activity or trying to marry a member of the same sex.
The military discharged nearly 10,000 service members under the policy in a 10-year period, from 1997 to 2007. The number fired each year dropped sharply after the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, when forces were stretched thin. Whereas more than 1,200 were dismissed in 2000 and 2001 for violating the policy, about half as many — 627 — were fired in 2007.
The Pentagon has not released its 2008 figures.
The White House has said President Barack Obama has begun consulting with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Michael Mullen on how to lift the ban. But the administration won't say how soon that might happen or whether a group of experts will be commissioned to study the issue in-depth, as some Democrats have suggested.
Likewise, Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill support repealing the ban but have not promised to press the issue immediately.
can it be both?stiff supple
Why not
Are you going to cry?
Possibly.
Dang BTB!
You have some literary talent there...subs ute "throbbing manhood" for " " and you may have a future writing romance novels!stiff supple meaty lubed up
Oh !
edit:
Summers' hubby here. Seriously, she is giggling her ass off. I had to pick it up and re-attach it several times.
Oh, and just because I want to be the first to say it:
This thread is gay!
Hey man, being in the Army, I feel like it's not as clear-cut as you're making it seem. If it were, then sure, it would be fine to let them fight in combat. The fact of the matter is that having openly gay soldiers would disrupt unit cohesion, meaning that the one or two gay soldiers would be shunned, beat up or worse. It is absolutely necessary to have cohesion within the ranks and, unfortunately, most soldiers are already overloaded with testosterone and they don't need more motivation to terrorize somebody because of his sexual preferance. What would you rather have, a soldier who is seperated from the Army because of sexuality, or a soldier who commits suicide because his life is made a living by his fellow soldiers? It really has nothing to do with religion. The Army is not known as the most efficient machine in the world, but more often than not, there is a logical reason for their standard operating procedures. When you're in combat, you need to trust the man that is next to you and it's just a fact of life that most "red-blooded American" males are not very comfortable around gays.
You don't want a couple of s sucking on each other kawks durning battle. If the s did not have a possibility of war duty I say let the pole smokers in. Until then you get caught playing the knuckle shuffle on another mans piss pumper you cannot protect our country. Good rule
So gays are not "red-blooded American" males? Interesting... I must have missed that lecture in Biology. Thanks for the clarification.
So gays are not "red-blooded American" males? Interesting... I must have missed that lecture in Biology. Thanks for the clarification.
no.. they're not..
I would prefer that our country no longer view a person's sexual orientation as enough of a reason to justify exclusion or harassment, which is never going to happen as long as we continue to have laws and policies that stigmatize alternative lifestyles.
My gay cousin was an Army medic for several years and I'm pretty sure he wasn't sucking while starting IVs in Iraq for the first Gulf War.
I can make you copies of my notes. They have that weird blue copper-based blood, like horseshoe crabs.So gays are not "red-blooded American" males? Interesting... I must have missed that lecture in Biology. Thanks for the clarification.
Thanks, I would appreciate that.
how can you be so sure? I'm sure he was verrrryy tempted since they were unconscious sometimes.
no they aren't, smartass! no man will enjoy getting bent over and ed.So gays are not "red-blooded American" males? Interesting... I must have missed that lecture in Biology. Thanks for the clarification.
you know how it's a humiliation for a man to kneel before another? a show of authority when a man demands another man kneel before him to show respect?
well, gays kneel and like it. they are submissive to other men. this is not respectable.
that is why most real men don't respect them. they are feminine. they enjoy getting bent over and dominated by another man sexually. that's disgusting to any real man.
you know all those movies with rocky never submitting to his opponent? no matter what, you cannot conquer me? well, gays enjoy getting conquered by other men.
disgusting.
ALSO. it's hazardous to your health. anus is not meant for constant penetration.
Technically the military doesnt justify harrassment or exclusion. The reason for the "don't ask, don't tell" policy is to preclude sexual orientation from consideration. Frankly, it's not the military's business whether or not one of it's soldiers, airmen, sailors, or marines is gay.
Having said that, I'm not sure why the military hasn't gotten out in front of this issue and pressed forward with open integration. I'm pretty sure desegregation made some people uncomfortable at the time...but they pressed forward and it's now a well-integrated force.
You're not helping.
question is has back to basics ever been in the military?
I don't think so. I'm pretty sure he stays busy between being a Life Coaching & writing his gay romance novels.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
