Reply With Quote
God and he strikes me as a ing weasel. He's just a slimeball trying to squirm his way out of this by saying whatever it takes to make Jon Stewart happy. He's not going to change. He's going to keep doing his after this blows over and people forget.
Yeah the truth is we all lost though. That interview pissed me off more than anything else I've read or seen about this whole ing mess because it put a FACE to it for me. He's the ing poster child for these short sighted assholes that allowed this to happen.
God and he strikes me as a ing weasel. He's just a slimeball trying to squirm his way out of this by saying whatever it takes to make Jon Stewart happy. He's not going to change. He's going to keep doing his after this blows over and people forget.
God I need to stop watching it. It really does make me ing angry to watch those old clips of his. If you're not ing outraged watching this guy then I'm not sure what its going to take.
Jesus... that was painful
Honestly... why would anyone put themselves through like that? Did he not remember what he had said? Was he not aware that TDS diggs up old clips to make their points? and if you're a weasel (which Cramer definately looks like one) wouldn't you prefer to skip going on the show? I mean, couldn't he have ignored the whole thing given that it is "just a comedy show"?
All I'm saying is, the dude, on top of being a weasel... is not a very smart one.
Why did it take Stewart to eviscirate this guy? MSNBC has this er on their shoes all the ing time speaking with authority. No other network could at least do it under the guise attacking NBC? Jesus Christ, instead of blaming Bush or Obama people need to wake up and start blaming the assholes actually running these scams. He admits to criminal behaviour and didn't care because the SEC couldn't stop him.
So ing outrageous but we have no time for this because we need to find out what OctoMom is wearing today.
He reminds me of a low life criminal doing his best to get a plea deal. And actually, thats exactly what he was doing. Look at him trying to make a deal with Stewart. I'll get you the big fish! Just trust me!
Worthless. I'm pretty sure that if Jim Cramer was on fire I woudln't waste the piss to put him out. He's just as bad as Madoff.
I read that the interview was much longer, like eight minutes longer, and that the full unedited interview will be up on the daily show site sometime early this morning. Should be interesting.
....glad you guys finally get it.........
Nbadan on Cramer..
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthre...ghlight=cramer
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthre...ghlight=cramer
Where is BDog?
I didn't expect I'd come away with a substantially worse opinion of Kramer before this interview came on. I just thought he was another asshat TV pundit with a disarming off-the-wall schtick (big buttons, sound effects, running around the set like a tweeker), I didn't realize what a he really is.
these dudes need to talk to b-dog about politics....he'll set em str8
Pathetic.
I'm amazed that this kind of goes on the the most sophisticated financial market in the world. Imagine what goes on in emerging markets' stock markets . . .
If only anyone gave a flying about what you think.
As someone who lost over a third of my 401k in a 3-month period last year, I can appreciate Manny's comments. However, to be fair, the people that listen to Cramer are probably casual day traders. I do think the entire interview was more or less an ambush. Cramer comes on his show and what happens? Stewart has an army of interns that poor through archival video and they play a clip of Cramer from 2006? The whole thing was just AWWWKWAARD. I could even sense that the audience was getting uncomfortable. If it was Stewart's mission to publicly humiliate Cramer and possibly end his career then all I can say is -- MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. But, was it funny? Not to me. Anyway, I guess the lesson learned is: Don't with Jon Stewart.
Specially if you are wrong in the first place and think you can win a debate just by having your entire network to back you up and slime the opposition. This whole thing started with Stewart's piece on that Santinelli prick ( or whatever he s called) and instead of those assholes at MSNBC just beeing quiet and taking the well deserved hit, they ganged up on Stewart thinking it was a good idea.
So when Cramer is asking how did this happen, look at the jerks in your own newsgroup and thank them. Fox and other networks just used the piece as any compe ion would....they either get a hit on Stewart or MSNBC, either way its a good day in the office.
It was a clear ambush. But I enjoyed it. Cramer was an idiot back in '98 when he appeard on Squawk Box as commentator from TheStreet.com, and is more of an asshole now.
Cramer was prepared to grovel......why else would he want to be on the show in the first place. The suprising thing is that Stewart didn't let the guy off the hook, roll 2-10 2-12 he wasn't going to miss the oppurtunity to expose what this brand of people (not just Cramer in particular) are all about. "It's not a game......you all know whats going on", devastating stuff....
I'm kinda curious how they got Cramer to appear on the show. I wonder what Stewart's producers said to Cramer to persuade him to be a guest. Had he known what was going to happen, do you really think he would've agreed? Reminds me of that teenage girl in Florida that was invited over to a "friends" house to get her ass kicked for a Youtube video.
cramer's ratings were dropping from this while stewarts were going up.
cramer had no choice. he had to accept the appearance.
Wow. That was painful. Not as entertaining as I'd hoped. I actually used to like watching Cramer from time to time, just because he's on speed or something. But now, I can't help but hate his guts.
Just....wow.
Oh please. Cramer isn't the smallest bit of a victim here so please stop trying to paint him as such.
Poor ing Cramer. Poor criminal ass sleezy weasel of a man. Poor Poor Cramer.
Ok, whatever, but I agree with CBF that it wasn't entertaining.
But he has a point, something I was wondering myself. Leading up to this interview, when I heard Cramer would be on his show, I instantly said to myself "Oh they planned this whole fued thing, gay"
Why would Cramer come on? He didn't even look prepared to do anything to save face.
mannys right, darrins. what do you have to gain by pretending cramers behaviour is acceptable?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
