We all thought Pop was simply resting Bowen early in the season. Now we have to face the facts: Pop no longer really has confidence that Bowen can do the job. Sometimes the legs just go without warning.
I hate to say it, but I agree....As much as I dont want Kobe to perform good in AT&T Center...honestly speaking he really is an MVP. I dont know if San Antonian becoming sarcastic but to see your lovely team trail by 18 at home with anybody but Manu present...i dont know what to say either.
“Just give the ball to whoever Bonner is guarding,” Rasheed Wallace yelled.
If I were Bonner, I probably got a hard time sleeping....
We all thought Pop was simply resting Bowen early in the season. Now we have to face the facts: Pop no longer really has confidence that Bowen can do the job. Sometimes the legs just go without warning.
Agreed, I feel somewhat better about the loss today. Obviously Pop was tinkering and trying some things out.
We've got no chance of catching the Lakers, so why not?
On the other hand, Pop does not exactly have a stellar record against PJ. I have little doubt that PJ is already 5 steps ahead of Pop everytime we step on the court.
Also, we could have used a win against this team. I'm convinced that they're in our heads in a big way, in much the same way we hold court with the Suns. I'm wondering if we honestly believe we can beat the Lakers. That's where it all starts.
There is nothing on paper that says SA can beat LA even when SA is healthy.
The only matchup SA has a clear advantage is Parker over Fisher but LA has guys who they know they can turn to to lock down Parker (Kobe, Ariza). Fisher and Farmar just keep the spot warm.
Kobe with a clear advantage at the 2 and no one for SA can guard him. SA is so slow that even Walton and especially Ariza can constantly attack.
Both Pau or Bynum can play Duncan evenly on both end by themselves due to their skill and length as well as Duncan being hampered. The other one just abuses whatever big man is left.
And off the bench, Ginobili is unlikely to be 100% so him having an impact every game is unlikely. No one else can consistently make an impact off SA's bench. For LA - LO is a nightmare for the Spurs and LA has a bench that always does well against SA because SA is too slow to stay with them.
Even the coaching matchup is in LA's favor. Last year, SA had one edge in mental strength because LA (as that group) hadn't been there but that is even gone. Whats more, SA lacks the continuity because they all haven't been there together for years like previous SA teams. There are 4 new pieces in the top 8 rotation and they have zero PT together because of the injuries.
Even style of play tilts in LA's favor. SA at their best could slow the game down, make it less posessions, and out execute LA. Not any more and they don't have the firepower to hang with LA over 48.
The chances are slim to none that SA beats LA in a series and slim is looking for the exit.
Of course we can't "match up" with the Lakers if we don't have Manu.
Why don't people realize that the Spurs playing without Manu is exactly like the Lakers playing without Bryant?
Manu is our closer and has been since 2005. But this year we've been having to do it by committee. Frankly I'm shocked that our record is as good as it is this year with Manu either out or still "finding his rhythm."
If he's back for the playoffs at 95%, and Tim is no worse than he is right now (at 75%), we'll be in pretty good shape for the playoffs. And Gooden will really help us as well.
If Bryant is hurt, who is the closer for the Lakers? Fisher? Odom? Is Pau going to take it from the key and create? They would be a trainwreck. Yet with our best offensive creator and best defensive difference maker out, the whole world merely talks about how great the Lakers are.
I'm sick of the NBA - the National Bryant Association. Let's just take care of business and get our ring back in June.
If you're trying to make your argument or even convince yourself of why it's a no-brainer that the lakers win against the Spurs, you ultimately have to narrow your arguments down to this simple question - do the lakers have enough talent to overcome the talent of the Spurs and more importantly the execution of the Spurs' game plan? Credit PJ all you want, but the fact is that as PJ has succeeded with very talented teams - GP has succeeded with less talented teams.
The bottom line is the Spurs don't match up well with the Lakers. I don't know how many more games you need to see to realize this. They just can't handle the length, speed, and quickness of the Lakers. When Bynum returns it's going to tilt the already favorable matchups that much more in the favor of LAL.
For the Spurs to win a 7 game series it's going to take one of a flawless effort. It can be done, but it's not likely. Even the most homer of Spur fans has to realize that now.
Ludden is re ed
How convenient. If the Spurs won, it would be an eye opener, right? Because they beat the #1 team in the league w/o Manu, a hobbled TD, with a starter named Matt Bonner. Since the Spurs lost, it's just a regular season game.![]()
Riddle me this Doc...when he returns, how healthy is he TRULY going to be?When Bynum returns it's going to tilt the already favorable matchups that much more in the favor of LAL.
If he's not healthy, then how does it tilt anything?
Translation: CIA = tanking.
I don't think it's that complicated. The Lakers are just better. They proved it last year, they proved it last night. The injuries just make it worse for the Spurs but the Lakers have their injuries too.
It's already tilted as it is. It tilts even more because instead of seeing Mbenga, you'll be seeing Andrew Bynum. An 85% Bynum is still way more than Mbenga could ever dream of becoming.
Really? 85%...seriously?
How does one determine 85%?
Outside of having measurements done via Cybex (It's this device called a Dynamometer) PRIOR to his injury, how does one determine if he's at 85%. And assuming that his leg is able to generate the needed force to hit 85%, what does that mean for his game? Does it mean he'll be only 85% as fast? Does it mean that he can only jump 85% as high? Does it mean that he'll only be able to cover 85% of the paint since he's not 100%?
See, what happens when you try to quantify an injury? Look, I'll say it. Manu last season was not 100% and it affected him and the team when it most counted. This season, both teams will have issues...I'm intimating that Bynum's injury will affect him more than you guys think. 265 lbs is what his legs have to support in one of the world's most challenging sports.
GOOD LUCK.
Tim is hurt. He is obviously laboring out there. We have no chance of beating the Lakers if he isn't healthy so losing last night doesn't really hurt that much. I saw some positive things. Tony Parker showed glimpses of what he would be like if he could shoot the three consistently. Drew Gooden showed glimpses of hustle and his excellent offensive skill set. Michael Finley showed that he might not be done after all and could be an asset against the Lakers in the playoffs.
What distresses me is that the Spurs homecourt advantage is gone. WTF? Where did all the Laker fans come from? I saw way too many Laker jerseys at the AT&T Center. I was at a Double Daves Pizza and to my horror, we were outnumbered by Laker fans. WTF? In San Antonio? We are outnumbered by Laker fans? As a Spurs fan, we need to take back our town. I don't know how we are going to accomplish this. But this is bull . When the Spurs go to LA, everyone is against them. Here Kobe is getting MVP chants. This is total bull .
It's called bandwagon fans.
For all the you talk about Laker fans you will never see that happen at the Staples Center.
Really? 85%...seriously?
How does one determine 85%?
Outside of having measurements done via Cybex (It's this device called a Dynamometer) PRIOR to his injury, how does one determine if he's at 85%. And assuming that his leg is able to generate the needed force to hit 85%, what does that mean for his game? Does it mean he'll be only 85% as fast? Does it mean that he can only jump 85% as high? Does it mean that he'll only be able to cover 85% of the paint since he's not 100%?
See, what happens when you try to quantify an injury? Look, I'll say it. Manu last season was not 100% and it affected him and the team when it most counted. This season, both teams will have issues...I'm intimating that Bynum's injury will affect him more than you guys think. 265 lbs is what his legs have to support in one of the world's most challenging sports.
GOOD LUCK.
85% is an arbitrary number. If he does return, the Lakers will make sure he is at least that. There have been questions about the competence of the medical staff of the Lakers but I don't think they will let Bynum get back if they know it will hurt Bynum or the team.
The good news for the Lakers is that they didn't need Bynum to beat the Spurs last year. Manu will keep getting injuries, it's beginning to be a trend. He hasn't been healthy for the longest time. It will be interesting to see what Gooden can bring to the table this late in the game. For selfish reasons, I hope he does not mesh. LOL. The Lakers can get back to the Finals w/o Bynum.
A fairweather fan educating me about bandwagon fans. Thanks guy.
Never say never Ludden.
Ludden must not watch the Spurs all the time anymore. Pop has put Bowen in several times for extended minutes over the course of the year and Bowen has demonstrated he still has the quicks that have enabled him to be one of the best defenders ever. He has increased Bowens minutes lately but I just do not see him deviating from the preservation of Bruce for any reason whatsoever.
Really what I saw moer than anything was a Lakers team that clearly gameplanned. The Lakers did a pretty good job of keeping the paint clogged and it was pretty obvious that they were determined to keep Tony off the rim. When we put in the second unit in the second quarter, it seemed that the Lakers were not quite as prepared and we started to claw back a little bit.
To be honest, I am beginning to think that Pop never game plans. I know thats not true but you didn't see us trying to deny Kobe the ball and the likes.
Ludden is an ass. It will be tough, but so what? Spurs have a great opportunity, a call here or there a turnover here or there and it's anybody's ballgame. Spurs will be as healthy as they can be with Manu back. Spurs are champions and they will play like ones come Play-offs. Anyone who discounts them is ignoring the Spurs' history.
Again...why is it do you Laker fans instantly think that he's going to come back at close to full strength? I mean , Tiger Woods is the most dominant golfer in the world and AFTER knee surgery and intensive re-hab what has he won? ZIP...NADA...NOTHING. It takes time and a month or even 2 months MAY NOT BE ENOUGH for AB.
I could be wrong, but ask yourself, how sad will you be if I'm not?
Man...Figueroa Street hasn't seen a parade for what...7 seasons now? Hey at least you got American Idol.
2-0 vs. the Celtics, 2-0 vs the Cavs giving the only lone defeat to the Cavs, 2-1 vs. the Spurs plus experience that they had last year, the best record in the league. Barring no more injuries, with or without Bynum, they have a very good chance of getting out of the West. WCF vs. the Spurs with Spurs a year older? Who is going to stop Kobe? Bowen? I hate to say it (smirk), the Lakers have the Spurs' number.
Besides, I happen to know you're a Laker fan at heart.
Having Bynum back is a plus, not necessarily a necessity to get to the Finals.
P.S.
You'll be waiting for more than 7 years, the countdown has already started. Make that 2 years after this year. But I doubt you'll wait 7 years. You'd be LakersMan in Black by then.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)