Slavery Reparations in congress

[CosmicCowboy]

No mule?

...If they can find any former US slaves I'm all for giving them 40 acres in downtown Washington DC and a whole ing HERD of mules. If they CAN'T find any former slaves then they need to just shut the up.

BTW, glad to see you hoto's off of pimpin gay marriage and back on topic.

[Blake]

No, because he would never want to.

That question is beyond ludicrous.

so no gay man has ever gone back to being straight?

and I'm not talking about what you think a gay man would or would not want to do. I am talking about a gay man's legal rights.

which I think we are on page 9 now and you still don't get this simple fact.

[BacktoBasics]

How's that poll going for you Blake?

[ElBorracho]

...If they can find any former US slaves I'm all for giving them 40 acres in downtown Washington DC and a whole ing HERD of mules. If they CAN'T find any former slaves then they need to just shut the up.

BTW, glad to see you hoto's off of pimpin gay marriage and back on topic.

Its "joto's" dumbass.

[oklahomasuckstexas]

[DarkReign]

If somebody gets a divorce, and then wants to get re-married to a different person in the Catholic Church, when the Church says no, can that person sue the Church?

...ahem....

[CosmicCowboy]

Its "joto's" dumbass.

oops. My apologies for the typo joto.

[JoeChalupa]

So, did anyone with one point of view change due to something another person posted with an opposing view?

[peewee's lovechild]

BTW, glad to see you hoto's off of pimpin gay marriage and back on topic.

Spell it right, pendejo.

I'ts "jotos". As in the group of guys that you're intimidated by because you're afraid that you might actually like thier lifestyle.

[peewee's lovechild]

and I'm not talking about what you think a gay man would or would not want to do. I am talking about a gay man's legal rights.

That's what we're talking about.

And, a gay man does not have the legal right to marry his partner.

So, once again . . . thank you.

[Blake]

How's that poll going for you Blake?

Last I checked, it was your poll.

Polls asking people if a fact is really a fact is always a great way to disprove the fact, especially when it appears many of the people reading your thread are misunderstanding the point of the poll.

Some are pro-gay rights, so therefore they are voting #1.

[Blake]

That's what we're talking about.

And, a gay man does not have the legal right to marry his partner.

So, once again . . . thank you.

a gay man does not have the right to marry another man.

Neither do I.

Once again you're welcome.

Page 9.

[BacktoBasics]

Last I checked, it was your poll.

Polls asking people if a fact is really a fact is always a great way to disprove the fact, especially when it appears many of the people reading your thread are misunderstanding the point of the poll.

Some are pro-gay rights, so therefore they are voting #1.

Its your quote and its opposition. Sorry you don't like the results. You were the one that suggested the poll.

[Blake]

So, did anyone with one point of view change due to something another person posted with an opposing view?

pretty rare when it does.

[Blake]

Its your quote and its opposition. Sorry you don't like the results. You were the one that suggested the poll.

you were the one that started the poll, jeenyus. I just (sarcastically) said to open a new one and move it out into the club area.

On the surface it's easy to vote #1 because #2 appears to be "anti-gay".

[Blake]

, the thread has already turned into a gay rights thread when that's not even the question.

Nice job.

[BacktoBasics]

On the surface it's easy to vote #1 because #2 appears to be "anti-gay".

Aside from feeling that you're a total moron I think you were being anti-gay as well.

[Dark Gable]

I'll stay out of this one or risk getting banned.

[Blake]

Aside from feeling that you're a total moron I think you were being anti-gay as well.

I've clearly stated that I'm not.

You fail again.

[BacktoBasics]

I've clearly stated that I'm not.

You fail again.

Were you as clear as I was about comparing gay rights to slavery on page one?

[Blake]

Were you as clear as I was about comparing gay rights to slavery on page one?

Yes. Maybe I should start a poll though in case you don't think so.

If gays ultimately get that right (which sooner or later they will) then great. Good for them.

Lets discuss reparations for discriminating against black people while we continually discriminate on tax paying sexuals.

Because one we used to treat like a 10th of a human being that didn't pay taxes but now gets treated equally and pays taxes while the other pays 100% of their taxes and still gets treated like a 10th of a human being.

[LnGrrrR]

After reading through the first four pages of this thread... Blake's gotta be a troll, right? I mean, he seems relatively intelligent, and is just here to antagonize people.

[LnGrrrR]

a gay man can marry a woman the same as I can.

he wants the extra right to marry another man. Extra meaning that he wants +1 on top of what he and I both already have.

I'm sorry you don't understand basic math.

You are an idiot.

Technically, they're fighting for you to have that same option, are they not?

So, using your logic, they are fighting for an extra right for everyone.

Edit: Nevermind... didn't read far enough into the thread.

[LnGrrrR]

Your idiocy knows no bounds.

You're just embarrasing yourself at this point.

A gay person, man or woman, obviously has no interest in marrying someone of their opposite sex. Currently, let me get up to speed on current events, gay people can not legally get married.

You're trying to make an absurd point, if you can even call it that. But, the only thing that comes through is your brilliant stupidity.

Didn't Henry Ford say you can pick whatever color of car you like, as long as it's black?

I think that's Blake's thought process here lol

[DarrinS]

Reparation is just such a stupid concept.

yep


Did I read correctly that Robert Byrd is part of this? Irony.