Reply With Quote
Yeah seeing as they couldn't afford to sign him for more than 7 million I doubt thats happening....
It's that type of callous way of thinking that has the Spurs frontline shorthanded in the first place. Do you want a 34 year-old 3-pt shooter or do you want a 28 year-old, low post threat?
I just can't sign off on that way of thinking. Gooden has fallen into the Spurs lap. He is CLEARLY the most talented frontcourt player that we've had in here since D-Rob left the building. A bonafide low-post player who can SCORE and REBOUND. Regardless of what he does this year, if he is indeed at all serious about staying, the Spurs would be BIG FOOLS to let him walk. After all, he aint Carlos Boozer, in terms of his reputation for going back on his word.
Need more reasons? Look at what is in the frontcourt hopper now. KT is old. Oberto plays older. Ian is unproven. Bonner is a defensive spaz. And of course, Duncan is 32, has played a tremendous amount of minutes, has knee problems and desparately needs his nightly responsibilities offloaded in a big way. Who on the roster is prepared to do that? No one.
Provided Gooden is sincere, the Spurs had better find a way to ink this guy for the long term.
Yeah seeing as they couldn't afford to sign him for more than 7 million I doubt thats happening....
Good post. I agree. Unless the Spurs can sign someone better then Gooden is worth resigning.
Hey, I like Rasheed too. Had Gooden not come along, I'd be all in. However, now that he has, and unless the Spurs can find cap room for both, they'll likely have to choose between the two. That said, I go with Gooden.
When you take Duncan's knees and need for rest in the future then Gooden (for the long term) becomes all more important.
As long as we keep him for the future at a reasonable price- the price we have him for this season is more than a bargain!
if he can hack it defensively -- and we should be able to coach him up -- then i'm all for re-signing Gooden. He's in that perfect age range -- still athletic and healthy (mostly) but experienced enough to know what he's doing and also hungry for a ring.
When was the last time Gooden was "easily" a 12/10 guy?
Why are the Spurs so worried about money?
Calm down mother er, it's not that big a deal. One, Fab will most likely be gone. Also, Mason is not a player who depends on speed or athleticism, so his game will be constant farther than a Kobe, Wade, or Manu. And KT will get solid minutes, so whenever he's on the floor having 2 scoring bigs is an impossibility. Any of combo of Tim, Bonner, and Gooden would work. But then again, I think Bonner is only a scoring big with Tim on, so he can get ridiculously open looks.
I can't see why RASHEED WALLACE for the MLE looks like a horrible decision to you. He might be 34, but he is still damn good. And since he's a big, he won't deteriorate as fast as a guard. I would like both, a big rotation of Tim/Gooden/Sheed/Bonner/Ian/KT would rock.
But with Pops love of small ball, I don't think it would be possible. It seems to be too many anyways, so I'd trade Bonner, because a motivated Sheed would provide all he does and more. But if all that happens and Sheed still loses his temper and gets T at his usual rate, I wll feel like a .
Oh yeah, put down the crack pipe, Goodens avg is like 13 and 8 over his career, I doubt he'll score a point less and get 2 more boards than usual playing behind Timmy. But if he can even avg 7 and 7 in the POs, I'll be happy. And have a rudimentary understanding of the D and O schemes, as well as put that knowledge to good use.
San Antonio= small market
Los Angeles= huge market
I was going to be sarcastic, but idk if you're more of an Allonon or a lakaluva, yet. I'm hoping for the former.
If we win it all, that might help seal the deal for him staying.
If it's between Gooden and Sheed, we'd get the one who'd agree to get the MLE. That is if we decide to use the MLE at all this summer.
We still don't know how Gooden will fit in, so it's pointless to discuss whether he deserves $7 mil a year or less. For all we know he might suck and get some 10 mins max. If he plays so well that he'd deserve a hefty contract then chances are some team will offer him more than we could afford to anyway.
Hope getting a ring is more important. As well as backing up the best PF ever to lace them up.
I feel ya man. The thought of actually having a real scoring/rebounding presence in the post besides Duncan for the first time in forever is very exciting. But from what we know about Gooden right now I don't think he is worth more than 7 million a year. What holds me back are the questions about him defensively. If he shows he can learn the rotations and at least be serviceable on that end then I might have a little more urgency in wanting to keep him...but right now he is only worth MLEish money.
I hope Drew will stay and we odd a solid player, too.
I definately wouldn't mind keeping him and getting Sheed if we can pull it off.
If you can convince them to split the MLE somehow. We don't have bird rights on Gooden.
And of course using the MLE this summer would mean there's no 2010 plan other than resigning Mason and extending Manu's contract.
I feel you too, dude. Of course, we all know that it takes most players well into their 2nd season before they are comfortable with and actually learn the Spurs system. Having said that, it's very possible we may not see the best of Gooden this year. If the Spurs CAN negotiate him for about 7m, yeah it's worth it.
Let's not forget this franchise DID invest at least 7mil in both Rasho and Malik Rose.
Last edited by SenorSpur; 03-20-2009 at 09:01 AM.
which spurs players contracts are dropping off after THIS season ?
I don't think you can use the MLE to re-sign your own players.
He can take a smaller contract for 2009 that has a greater payout in 2010 or 2011.
Let's hope Gooden has the same championship pedigree to shop around this summer. (If that happens, I'll take whatever comes.)at your sig
Is that the post-game 6 of the 2003 Spurs-Lakers series?
their " asterisk "
I understand why S Jax left cause i mean he had a breakout year winning the championship in 03 and wanted a payday. Didn't Gooden take less money to come here? Dude is sincere in wanting to settle down somewhere IMO.
There wasn't much difference in money, but career-wise, playing on a team that will go deep into the playoffs (fingers crossed) is great exposure for a soon-to-be free agent. Its win-win for him. If he plays well and SA likes him and he wants to stay, that could happen. If he doesn't want to stay or wants more money, his (theoretical) strong play in the playoffs will bump his price.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
