West Playoffs:
1) Lakers v 8) Mavericks = Lakers in 4
2) Spurs v 7) Hornets = Spurs in 6
3) Rockets v 6) Blazers = Rockets in 7
4) Nuggets v 5) Jazz = Jazz in 6
Semifinals
Rockets v Lakers = Lakers in 6
Spurs v Jazz = Spurs in 7
Western Conference Finals
Lakers v Spurs= Spurs in 7 because ginobli adds much more to the spurs than the human glass Andrew Bynum adds to the lakers
West Playoffs:
1) Lakers v 8) Mavericks = Lakers in 5
2) Spurs v 7) Hornets = Spurs in 7
3) Rockets v 6) Blazers = Blazers in 6
4) Nuggets v 5) Jazz = Jazz in 6
Semifinals
Blazers v Lakers = Lakers in 6
Spurs v Jazz = Spurs in 7
Western Conference Finals
Lakers v Spurs= Spurs in 7
1 Lakers vs. 8 Mavs = Lakers in 5
2 Spurs vs. 7 Hornets = Spurs in 5
3 Rockets vs. 6 Blazers = Rockets in 7
4 Nuggets vs. 5 Jazz = Nuggets in 6
2nd Rd.
2 Spurs vs. 3 Rockets = Spurs in 6
1 Lakers vs. 4 Nuggets = Nuggets in 7 (oooh, did i just call an upset??)
Conf. Finals
2 Spurs vs. 4 Nuggets = Spurs in 5
I chose a very gutsy upset, but something tells me the lakers aren't coming back to the conference finals. i feel it in the wind...
I have a feeling there will be an upset...but then again this is the NBA and not the NCAA. I'm sure the refs will find a way to change the outcome of a game.
1 Lakers v 8 Jazz - Lakers in 5
2 Spurs v 7 Blazers- Spurs in 7
3 Rockets v 6 Mavs- Mavs in 6 (HOMERRR)
4 Nuggets v 5 Hornets- Hornets in 7
1 Lakers v 5 Hornets- Lakers in 5
2 Spurs v 6 Mavs-Mavs in 6 (HOMERRRR)
1 Lakers v 6 Mavs-Lakers in 5 (meh)
There are rarely any upsets. The warriors beat the mavs because don nelson coached there for so long. An upset would actually help the ratings.
that's just gas
(1) Lakers vs (8) Blazers- Lakers in 7
(4) Rockets vs (5) Nuggets- Nuggets in 6
(3) Hornets vs (6) Jazz- Hornets in 7
(2) Spurs vs (7) Mavericks- Spurs in 5
(1) Lakers vs (5) Nuggets- Lakers in 6
(2) Spurs vs (3) Hornets- Spurs in 6
Western Conference Finals
Lakers vs Spurs
Spurs in 6
(1) Lakers vs. (8) Blazers - Blazers in 6
(2) Spurs vs. (7) Mavericks - Spurs in 7
(3) Rockets vs. (6) Jazz - Jazz in 7
(4) Nuggets vs. (5) Hornets - Nuggets in 6
(4) Nuggets vs. (8) Blazers - Nuggets in 5
(2) Spurs vs. (6) Jazz - Spurs in 7
(2) Spurs vs. (4) Nuggets - Nuggets in 6
everybody who's favoring the spurs over the lakers are homers.
1st round:
(1) Lakers vs. (8) Mavericks - Lakers in 4
(2) Rockets vs. (7) Jazz - Rockets in 7 (finally get by the Jazz b/c T-Choke is out)
(3) Spurs vs. (6) Trailblazers - Spurs in 7 (Portland's young legs will wear San Antonio out and push them to the brink)
(4) Nuggets vs. (5) Hornets - Nuggets in 7 (w/ the home team going 7-0 at home)
2nd Round:
(1) Lakers vs. (4) Nuggets - Lakers in 5
(2) Rockets vs. (3) Spurs - Rockets in 6 (Spurs are better, but will have nothing left in the tank by then).
WCF:
(1) Lakers vs. (2) Rockets - Lakers in 5
the responses in this thread are classic.
First round
(1) Lakers vs (8) Mavericks - Lakers in 5
(2) Nuggets vs (7) Portland - Nuggets in 6
(3) Spurs vs (6) Hornets - Spurs in 6
(4) Rockets vs (5) Jazz - Rockets in 6
WCSF
Lakers vs Rockets - Lakers in 6
Spurs vs Nuggets - Spurs in 6
WCF
Lakers vs Spurs - Spurs in 5 - Laker meltdown after losing first game in a blowout.
anyone wanna bet me that the lakers will sweep the spurs
Are you sure you wanna lose???
the way spurs are playing they might go to 4
spurs vs glass man and the blazers = sweep
im not going to lose
It's probably going to be the Spurs and Lakers in the WCF. Stern wants it so that's what it will probably be. You can't fight what Stern wants. When he wants something, he gets it.
We saw it in 2006... But probably also due to his dislike of Cuban.
Spurs-Lakers and Cavs-Celtics in the Conf. Finals is what Stern would absolutely love....
I agree. And all the other teams have to go fishing because they don't fit into Stern's marketing plans...
but not spurs-cavs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
