Reply With Quote
I am laughing at how little a life you have that you go around on our boards acting like a jackass and trying to impress your boyfriend Kobe so he will stick it to you! I bet you dream every night of being that concierge that Kobe raped!
You can really tell things have declined in San Antonio when the fans start celebrating "moral" victories
I am laughing at how little a life you have that you go around on our boards acting like a jackass and trying to impress your boyfriend Kobe so he will stick it to you! I bet you dream every night of being that concierge that Kobe raped!
FAIL...just go to bed now and you might be able to stop the bleeding...might
@ your re ed post. I declare this a FAIL, I am the FAIL inspector! You are a worthless bandwagon fan!
@ you again
isn't that adorable...here's a nickel johnny, go get yourself some icecream
You know a Spurms fan has FAILED when they get so frustrated they bring out the same old, tired, untrue "Kobe's a rapist" smack. They got nothing else.
This decade, whether it includes the '99 year or not, Lakers win three championships, Spurs win three championships, they've both been deep in the playoffs several times. The Lakers have a slightly better percentage over the decade, while the Spurs have been there every year, which the Lakers have not. I don't know how you can say Lakers are definitively team of the decade. Spurs and Lakers would be the teams of the decade, but they're pretty even...
I never said they were the definitive team of the decade. but 5 appearances and 3 rings speaks for itself.. People will bring up 2005-2007, but I honestly think that helps our case. It's amazing to think the Lakers rebuilt themselves into a championship contender within 3 years...simply amazing. It's fairly even now, I agree, but a Laker win this year puts the argument to rest--as does a spurs win
Sure, you didn't say "definitive" but you certainly weren't including San Antonio in the picture in that first post. But as long as you admit it now, that's fine. It's interesting to note that apart from the Mavericks lone appearance, it's been the Lakers or the Spurs in the finals every single year since 1999.
yup, and if not for a stupid foul by Manu it could of been a decade long streak of Lakers/Spurs representation. Very impressive by both squads I must say
Willy Wonka wants his outfit back
that dude was pre-WONKA
Can you be more stupid? You're calling just "lucky" to all the teams that have won close games.
"Just a matter of making your shots". Is that easy or what? You gotta be able to do it in RS and carry it to PO. It usually works that way unless you're Robert Horry
And its not that the other teams "Are just making their shots", but the fact that we are having lapses in the last 4 mins of the 4th that we usually dont -we really miss manu there-.
We are not a soft team, but without manu we are softer. And thats what's hurting us so much.
Ill take a couple of your thoughts.
FO has made a lot of mistakes in the past 2 years. If we somehow rewind the tape we'll find some really re ed trades and signings.
And we have too much trash in Pop's doghouse, I wonder if Pop is collecting them as he do with the wines he buy.
Pop can have a bad year, hes human too, and I see this year as the worst year with the Spurs -decision making, rotation, trades opportunities, etc.-
But all that said, Manu's injury has caused us to note all this things becouse things are not working our way, success tend to show us the other face of the coin.
If rockets hadn' t lose to Pacers(twice) , 76ers(twice)
Grizzlies(twice) , Clippers ....and so on , then it' ll be leader Southwest Divsion steady
Everyone was just shooting some shots, turning some balls over, missing some freebies.
I got depressed everytime Spurs lost. But I am also euphoric when Spurs win. For the past few years since Tim was drafted, I have more highs than lows.
Hey, who am I to complain the Spurs lost by 2? Or a miss FT here and there? Cheer up all those who are depressed and I mean it is you Sequ...;-)
We'll go deep into the PO.
Houston sub-par??? Rockets are winning their games without mcgrady, not making excuses about not having him in the lineup. Coulda shoulda woulda.
Don't worry he really shouldn't of called Houston a subpar team. Sometimes he forgets to take his head of of his ass.
Houston's a good Western Conference team, but I will agree that you will not be actually winning the LOB this year either. But on the bright side, you are playing without McGrady and doing well. The Rockets may actually get the monkey off their back and get past the 1st round. That would be great for you Rocket fans. Cheers.
Team of the decade? They didn't even make the playoffs for one or two of those years and another year or two they lost in the first round.You might wanna figure out what Team of the Decade means
Consistency is a big part of what makes a "Team of the Decade" when you're looking at such a long period of time.
This decade...
Spurs NBA Champs: 1999, 2003, 2005, 2007 1+1+1+1=4
Lakers NBA Champs: 2000, 2001, 2002 1+1+1=3
4 > 3
I think that four championshipsis greater than three championships
. So I guess that would make the SPURS the team of the Decade!
You might want to check my math though, re !
My lord, not this again...
Here we go again, read carefully for this is the LAST time I will explain this.
Traditionally, decades cover groups of 10's? O.K.? When you see ESPN, read Sports Illustrated or any other sports information medium, 99.99% of the time you read or here sports reporters refer to spans of greatness by teams covering decades as in the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's etc., etc. The Spurs won the 1999 Championship hence closing the 90's which was dominated by the Bulls. The 00's came along and since 2000 the Spurs have won 3 and the Lakers have won 3 with Miami and Detroit in there each gaining one LOB. I don't see how your logic is working here and how you pick your own ten years. If that's the case than I'LL pick my own time span. Shall we say, the last 30 years who has won the most? LAKERS.
Qualifying statement:
The ushering of the new Millenium which started in 2000 is not counted in the 90's. I am writing this just in case you want to throw the "the 90's ended in 2000" which would be incorrect.
Sorry buddy. The Lakers and Spurs are tied whether you accept or not is another matter.
Dude, the new millenium started on Jan 1st 2001, don't embarass yourself.
Why are people fighting in this thread? Again this thread is not trash talking. Just stating facts
We just have to believe in this team and follow them..that's all. They're human..of course theyre going to win some games, and lose some games. But we are 45-24, the #3 seed in the West (technically #2 because Houston has 25 losses but anyway...) and still without one of our top 3 players. Manu, as we all have seen has carried this team through alot of games the past couple of years. He is probably one of the..if not THE clutchest player on the team. He is most likely coming back this week, and he will work his way back up in minutes...and the Spurs will win most of their remaining games...grab the 2 seed most likely..and go into the Playoffs fine...just like always.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
