WOW.
Of course, you'll just get the proverbial Chumpdumper response:
"What makes you think government debt is bad?"
WOW.
Of course, you'll just get the proverbial Chumpdumper response:
"What makes you think government debt is bad?"
No the response is "you never cared about government debt before when the Republicans were in charge."
You're right but i wonder why you weren't as timely when Bush was in office![]()
Touche!
Obama isn't the answer my friend but he sure as is better than these fascist suckers we had for 8 years. I can't believe it...they actually had a surplus when they came into office![]()
This pissed me off today more than anything else.
Change my ing ass. But yonivore still deserves to be slapped by a syphillitic elephant for even trying to pose as caring about government debt.
They prefer being lied to about fiscal conservatism while they get ed up the ass.
You obviously don't understand the graph.
How does Chumpdumper know if we cared about the budget when Bush was in charge?
John McCain certainly cared about the deficit. I doubt even you would argue he would present a budget as inflated as this.
Of course, John McCain is a natural leader. Obama is showing just how much of an amateur he is.
Fascist suckers?
Who is pushing for legislation to that will allow him to take over companies on a whim?
Who is pushing for legislation that will silence political opinion in newspapers? A direct contradiction to the First Amendment.
Who is spending and laughing all the way?
LMAO!! You got these libs arguing that "Bush was worse".
Not "the budget is good". Just "Bush was worse".
Look at the graph, guys. And those are projections WITH the rosy economic forecast.
Has anyone, besides me, asked why we passed a 700 billion dollar stimulus that doesnt even spend much money until the year the white house expects the GDP to grow by 4%?
And i don't agree with any of that. But i also can't agree with a stupid er
that ran this nation to an endless pit of debt and killed 4000 of our brave men
and women and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
The proof is in the deficits.
He said he cared, but he voted for his share of budgets.John McCain certainly cared about the deficit. I doubt even you would argue he would present a budget as inflated as this.
McCain led his campaign off a cliff and showed just how much of an amateur he was.Of course, John McCain is a natural leader. Obama is showing just how much of an amateur he is.
Can you please post an accurate graph with the iraq war costs factored in. I can't believe no one has called you on that.
Yea It sure is one tough cookie Yoni. Don't insult me by equating your intelligence with mine you remedial .
It's from the Heritage Foundation -- you will never get those numbers from them.
But you were, so why aren't you worried now?
So did Obama, so why is he ing about what he got left. He
only run for the office for two years. Poor guy.
No, I think it showed how impulsive John McCain can be. But I still trust his judgement better than Obama.
And you didnt answer my last question:
Why did we pass a 700 billion dollar stimulus that doesnt pump money into the economy until after the white house says the economy will have recovered?
NICE!!!
Yes, if Chumpdumper doesnt care, what makes Bush bad?
I don't care where the numbers are from. Its easy to paint a picture in a ceratain way if you ommit costs from one side and then add them on to the other.
If Yoni wants to compare those deficits and the projections, then lets do it. Lets see which are lower, the deficits run by Bush when you factor in all the costs the way Obama's administration is doing or those projected for Obama.
Talk about living in a glass house and throwing some stones.
Actually, the graph shows actual CBO calculated deficits during the Bush Administration. That'd be the Congressional Budget Office.
You'll notice the light pink bars are where the OBAMA administration tried to fudge the projections...but, the CBO did the hard math.
McCain looked like a lying idiot and he lost the election because of that. He lost the trust of the people.
You'll have to give me the exact date they said the economy is to recover and the dates the money reaches the economy. Then I can believe the question is valid.And you didnt answer my last question:
Why did we pass a 700 billion dollar stimulus that doesnt pump money into the economy until after the white house says the economy will have recovered?
This budget is a text book example of failure to perform risk mitigation. Even if the economy recovers faster than anyone is expecting, we will have a budget deficit that our nation can't manage. This will lead to hyper-inflation which will make all the saving everyone is dong completely moot.
Libs dont care because theyve spent too much time thinking just how "presidential" Obama looks!!!
This nation is so ing trendy it deserves everything it gets. Next time just elect Michael Douglas or Morgan Freeman and be done with it.
I have said in the past that the times of expansion like that during most of the Bush years wasn't a time to be running up deficits. It's right here in this forum. As soon as the economy tanked, there wasn't much else to be done but spend.
Obama is a liberal. One expects spending from a liberal. Did you guys elect Bush to run up the deficit during a time of economic expansion?So did Obama, so why is he ing about what he got left. He
only run for the office for two years. Poor guy.
I'll answer for you because I know you won't: No, you didn't.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)