I don't see how it could be anything other than Nuggets over Sonics in '94:
- Golden State was a horrible matchup for Dallas; they'd gone undefeated against the Mavs in the regular season and Avery was pretty much Don Nelson's even before the series. My recollection is that most people figured Dallas was in for a dogfight going in. Besides, Golden State dominated that series. They should have won it in five, not six. How much of an upset can a series be when it's that one-sided?
- New York over Miami? The Knicks had beaten the Heat in the previous year's playoffs, beat them again in 2000, and only lost to them in '97 because Ewing, Houston and Ward were suspended for Game 6. The '99 Knicks were a very good team that was a little beat up in the lockout season. Certainly better than their place in the standings would indicate, and they proved as much by getting to the Finals. At any rate, there was very little difference talent-wise between New York and Miami. Two very, very evenly matched teams.
-Now, with Denver-Seattle, all you have to do is look at the disparity between the teams in the years immediately prior to and following 1994. Seattle had been to the WC Finals in '93, won 57 games in '95, and won '64 games, plus the WC Championship, in '96. The core of that Denver team never had a winning season besides '94, when they won 42 games. It was one of the dominant teams of the '90s losing to a team that can barely be called a flash-in-the-pan.
It's Nuggets-over-Sonics with a bullet AFAIC.