I posted this in the other forum too, but I wanted to repeat it out here b/c it's Spurs-related. Yes, I'm a Laker fan, but I feel this is a serious problem for SA. Yes, the Lakers aren't a shining example of great defense, but they have played well against the good teams, and have not allowed a 100 point game since the Bulls game. Forget about all that, here's my take on SA.
Spurs are getting better offensively with the return of Ginobili and the acclimation of Gooden into the offense, but they've been a very shaky defensive team all year and that'll be their downfall. They just don't have the quickness on defense due to age and wear-and-tear to stay with the Lakers. , look at last night's game as a perfect example:
http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=290403011
The Spurs shot 55% from the field (41% from 3), made 27-31 FTs (w/ 12 more attempts than Indiana), outrebounded Pacers by 9, had only 4 more TOs, and had nearly 7 players in double figures--yet they squeaked out a win against the 32-44 Pacers who have nothing to play for. In any other season if you were to look at that San Antonio boxscore alone you'd think they won by 30. They simply don't have the defense or the consistent offense to beat LA. If this was an effort problem it could be corrected come playoff time, but a Pop-coached team never lacks in effort.