Reply With Quote
thermite dust = iron oxide and aluminum. thats it.
Blake...
I'd like you to do an experiment.
Take a block of rusted steel and a block of aluminum. Rub them together and see what you get. Look at the residue with a microscope.
thermite dust = iron oxide and aluminum. thats it.
Do they sell blocks of rusted steel and aluminum at home depot?
right. active thermite dust that is highly explosive.
= bomb
...Instead of debunking real 9/11 questions RG sinks to debunking conspiracy theorists.....precious...
what's your 9/11 question?
...rambling by RG..
Barry Jennings reiterated in the exclusive interview his confusion over the explanation for WTC7’s collapse– given that he clearly heard explosions inside the building:And even if witnesses do stick by the fact they heard explosions, so be it. Sure, someone can hear what they think is an explosion, but does that prove it to be so?
- Bruce Jennings“I’m just confused about one thing, and one thing only– why World Trade Center 7 went down in the first place. I’m very confused about that. I know what I heard– I heard explosions. The explanation I got was it was the fuel-oil tank. I’m an old boiler guy– if it was a fuel-oil tank, it would have been one side of the building.”
That interview was not released until June 2008 at the request of Mr. Jennings, who had received numerous threats to his job and asked that it be left out of Loose Change: Final Cut because of those threats.
The 9/11 Commission was blocked in so many ways via "National Security" and other obstructive measures so many times that the DOJ was nearly sued for obstruction of justice. The Commission was a fraud; the NTSB took at least 2-4 years to conduct an investigation. the 911 Commission? Less than 1....
Compare that to Shyam Sunder, WTC/NIST lead investigator...
This guy is such as poor liar I'd love to get him on a Texas Hold-um table...
There you have it......NIST picked a theory that they hope most people will believe and accept as a ‘probable’ … ....it sounds good…it must be the truth!
, just find some rusted steel and an aluminum can. Maybe put some steel in the fireplace for a bit if you have one.
Why are you being so difficult? Afraid I'm right?
I think Blake was posting tongue-in-cheek
How bad was the obstruction of the 1-year 9/11 investigation?
WikipediaSome members of the 9/11 Commission have criticized how the government formed and operated the commission, and allege omissions and distortions in the 9/11 Commission Report.[33][34][35] Commission co-chairs Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton wrote in their book "Without Precedent" that the 9/11 Commission was "set up to fail," and in an interview with CBC News, Mr. Hamilton complained of "poor access" and said that the Commission was unable to answer many of its questions about FAA and NORAD and White House activity. [36] He also acknowledged that NORAD had told the Commission things that were not true. [37] According to an article in Harpers, the Commissioners wrote that they threatened to seek prosecution of officials for criminal obstruction. [38]
If the Bush junta had nothing to hide why all the obstruction?
If I had to pick a likely cover-up by the Feds, I'd go with the TWA flight that crashed off Long Island in the mid 90s. Of course there's plenty of mental masturbation required to find a conspiracy there too.
...that's not a bad one...I'd pick UFOs...
so instead of asking a real 9/11 question, you sink to debunking RG.There you have it......NIST picked a theory that they hope most people will believe and accept as a ‘probable’ … ....it sounds good…it must be the truth!
...your right...that's like picking on the gimpy kid....
...rambling by dan..
did he clearly see explosives? a lot of things sound like explosions.Barry Jennings reiterated in the exclusive interview his confusion over the explanation for WTC7’s collapse– given that he clearly heard explosions inside the building:
why did they need WTC7 to collapse?
NIST? around 6The 9/11 Commission was blocked in so many ways via "National Security" and other obstructive measures so many times that the DOJ was nearly sued for obstruction of justice. The Commission was a fraud; the NTSB took at least 2-4 years to conduct an investigation. the 911 Commission? Less than 1....
what did he lie about?Compare that to Shyam Sunder, WTC/NIST lead investigator...
This guy is such as poor liar I'd love to get him on a Texas Hold-um table...
do you get owned by gimpy kids a lot?
what a shock.
yes, that was tongue in cheek.
...
...
so what was your real 9/11 question?...
...
still waiting....
....who made you Chumpy's ?
This man has passion!
Chump does have his followers. these salad tossing fools will drink the grape kool-aid and give their lives to the almighty savior ChumpDumper.
Chump could say termites brought down wtc7 and they would agree with him.
You mean flight 800?
That is one that I believe may have been a cover up. I think the Clinton administration had it shot down, kept it secret, then though president Bush was suppose to know what could happen. It's at least plausable, but if that's the truth. So be it. That plane may have been hijacked by terrorists, and they may have developed better techniques for 9/11. Possible flight 93 was also shot down, but credit given to those on board.
However...
I will never believe without real evidence that this was a conspiracy outside of the terrorist world.
In case you forgot about what was going on in the first year or three after 09-11-01, Congress and the American people were screaming for somebody in the government to blame, i.e. a scapegoat.
Who the would want to be honest and freely admit to anything even remotely close to looking like they might have been "asleep at the switch"?
Answer THAT question Dan, and you have the answer to your "cover-up".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
