Reply With Quote
Bush himself could visit you in your trailer to tell you they used explosives on 911 and you will still not believe, that is how thick headed you seem to be about the truth.
Ramble ramble ramble.
"thermite"! mumble mumble bumble...
"pull it"! TWITTTER, twitter twitter...
"explosions" doodle doodle dee...
Bush himself could visit you in your trailer to tell you they used explosives on 911 and you will still not believe, that is how thick headed you seem to be about the truth.
what space alien from area 51 made you his?
what is your real 9/11 question?
If you don't think this looks like an explosion you need glasses.
what is the truth?
I'm sure it also sounded like an explosion.
The nano-thermite high energy explosives found in the paper you cited would not create debris trajectories that shallow.If you don't think this looks like an explosion you need glasses.
High explosives, by definition, create rather flat debris trajectories, as the thousand+ feet per second blast waves would throw the debris out pretty fast.
Given that gravity pulls things downwards at 30 feet per second per second, and this picture was taken within a few seconds of the start of the collapse, it shows debris moving more down than away by a large margin doesn't it?
That is absolutely NOT what an explosion should "look like".
I'd have to agree with your analysis. The conspiracy theories simply do not add up.
Tell that to the family's who lost love ones during 9/11 what doesn't add up.
They are probably insulted by the "twoof" movement.
No . I bet most are.
i know for a fact that the families of the people who died on 9/11 have all read the 9/11 commission report, believe it 100% and have no further questions
9/11 Families
demand answers
http://www.oilempire.us/911families.html
Sept. 11 Widows Demand Answers
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...60412225938604
Exotic High Tech Explosives Positively Identified in World Trade Center Dust
— Editor
A ground-breaking scientific paper confirmed this week that red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of WTC dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive.
The samples were taken from far-separated locations in Manhattan, some as early as 10 minutes after the second tower (WTC 1) collapsed, ruling out any possible contamination from cleanup operations.
Authored by an international team of physicists, chemists, and others, the research paper was led "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe." It was published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2., and is available online for free download. The lead author is Niels H. Harrit of the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen.
The paper ends with the statement, "Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material."
Ordinary thermite burns quickly and can melt through steel, but it is not explosive. Nanothermite, however, can be formulated as a high explosive. It is stable when wet and can be applied like paint.
The presence of pre-planted explosives in the WTC buildings calls into question the official story that the buildings were destroyed by the airplane collisions and fire alone. The National Ins ute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the official government agency that investigated the building collapses, did not test for residues of explosives.
Richard Gage, AIA, said, "This peer-reviewed scientific study of the disturbing contents of the WTC dust is yet another smoking gun proving to the over 600 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) who I represent that a real investigation must be carried out immediately as to the actual cause of the destruction of the 3 WTC high-rises on 9/11."
One of the paper's co-authors is AE911Truth researcher/editor Gregg Roberts. When Roberts signed the AE911Truth pe ion demanding a new 9/11 investigation, he wrote, "What struck me on 9/11 was how much dust was created." Now, over 7 years later, Roberts has an intimate appreciation for that dust. The steel was removed and destroyed very quickly after the catastrophe, despite loud protests from fire fighters and others. It was destruction of the primary evidence at a crime scene. The dust, however, remains as a key piece of physical evidence.
The nine co-authors are Niels H. Harrit, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Jeffrey Farrer, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Steven E. Jones, S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, Kevin R. Ryan, 9/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, Frank M. Legge, Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia, Daniel Farnsworth, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Gregg Roberts, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA, James R. Gourley, International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX, and Bradley R. Larsen, S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT.
http://www.ae911truth.org/info/51
A twoofer waters her lawn.
/thread
if this is /thread, then what are you doing wasting time here?/thread
you should be taking this definitive proof and running it to the media and to the 9-11 families that you brought up.
This is the stupidest thread ever.
Google 'Press For Truth'. They already know about it.
so if it's truth, why aren't the you, the media and these families pressing the issue in a court of law?
it's a shame that some of these people that have suffered such a hard loss are getting duped into donating to a bogus website like 9/11: press for truth which gives them some kind of weird false hope.
Its more than you and your lover Chump gives us.
more bogus information doesn't equal better information.
NIST reports are enough.
you fail again, mouse.
lol 9-11 conspiracies
Yet another page, that must have this group of links.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
