mouse isn't really interested in what really took place on 9/11. He's just here to argue with anyone to help cure his boredom.
Andrews AFB was not a fighter alert base for the Northeast Air Defense Sector in 2001. Fighters were sent up from Otis AFB, which was a fighter alert base in 2001.
Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."
Romero, who agrees with the scientific conclusion that fire triggered the collapses, demanded a retraction from the Journal. It was printed Sept. 22, 2001. "I felt like my scientific reputation was on the line." But emperors-clothes.com saw something else: "The paymaster of Romero's research ins ute is the Pentagon. Directly or indirectly, pressure was brought to bear, forcing Romero to retract his original statement." Romero responds: "Conspiracy theorists came out saying that the government got to me. That is the farthest thing from the truth. This has been an albatross around my neck for three years."
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...42.html?page=4
I think he sells bootleg copies of the DVDs for profit.
Are you going to post every slide from Richard Gage's little show?
Be sure to include his high tech models:
Are you going to post every slide from Richard Gage's little show?
Be sure to include his high tech models:
A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust (english sub les)
Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center.
He is interviewed on danish TV2 News.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o
ALSO
Tomorrow, Saturday April 11th, Dr. Kevin Barrett will be interviewing two key 9/11 eyewitnesses on Truth Jihad Radio, 6-8 pm Eastern (3-5 pm Pacific) at http://www.wfuradio.com.
First hour guest will be Scott Forbes, who worked in the WTC and exposed the 36-hour power-down in the South Tower on the weekend before 9/11. This would have disabled all security systems and allowed "engineers" to come and go at will with (last-minute demolition prep?) equipment. The official story denies this power-down ever happened -- but Forbes is credible and says he has lots of corroborating witnesses, who will presumably come forward when subpoenaed by the upcoming New York City official re-investigation:
http://www.nyccan.org
In the second hour, April Gallop, a survivor of the Pentagon attack who carried an injured baby out the hole in the building and saw no evidence whatsoever of any airplane debris--then was browbeaten in the hospital by security guys insisting she should say it was a plane. April is suing the government for not evacuating the Pentagon even though they were aware an attack was imminent, and will discuss the progress of her lawsuit. She says that based on what she experienced, alongside other evidence, the damage at the Pentagon was done by a bomb, not a passenger aircraft. April is clearly a sincere, credible witness.
This is a political forum. Can't they make a bat- crazy forum for these threads?
Some dunce on a website thinks he's smarter than a scientist. Nice!
Nice autobiographical comment.
some rambling idiot that copies and pastes everything with the numbers 9 1 1 on it thinks he's smarter than the NIST. Even nicer!
not only that but theses guys are Architect experts and demolition experts.
I'm not. You're not. The NIST are the experts.
You're idiots.
Wouldn't it have burned or melted all the other debris?
When have you proven me wrong?Like you really want answers, you just want to take the opposing side no matter how many times we prove you wrong. Your out to get peoples goats.
Here is another explosive interview with Niels Harrit:
Danish 9/11 truth in MSM with sub les, Niels Harrit on "GoodMorning Denmark" in december 2007.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jze33vZCpwo
Your jig is up, debunkers. Time to switch, rather than fight.
Further Implications:
1)
Those who are sick from breathing in toxic WTC dust are now known to have breathed in nano-thermite. This paper will be evidence at their lawsuits.
2)
Military grade, explosive nano-thermite is probably a guarded military secret. If so, the military should not have spread 10 tons of it in the World Trade Center.
3)
Some claim the media is in on the conspiracy. Well, I can tell you categorically that Danish TV is not in on the conspiracy!
The Bentham Open Behavioral Science Journal Editorial Board
ISSN: 1874-2300 Volume 3, 2009
Editor-in-Chief:
Kiyofumi Yamada
Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
Nagoya, Japan
Editorial Advisory Board:
J. Agassi (Israel)
G. Ascoli (USA)
G.J.L. Beckers (Germany)
L.L. Betzig (USA)
D.F. Bjorklund (USA)
S. Blackmore (UK)
J. Boden (New Zealand)
D.L. Boero (Italy)
P. Bouissac (Canada)
C.R. Bramham (Norway)
S. Brĺten (Norway)
M. Brüne (Germany)
M.M.C. Brysbaert (UK)
G.M. Burghardt (USA)
etc.
See all 113:
http://www.bentham.org/open/tobsj/EBM.htm
Tell me what the scientists did to specifically rule out red paint as the material in the chips.
You wouldn't be able to understand it. This is advanced science. PhD Chemists can tell the difference between red paint and thermite.
Surely you can explain it to us.
PhD Chemists can tell the difference between red paint and reactive thermite.
You have just been nominated to the idiot of the month club.
Then you can tell me how they did it.
Please explain.
I don't have a PhD in chemistry. I took 5 credits of engineering chemisty in college, that's it.
Why don't you go play outside with a third-grader's chemistry set?
So you don't understand anything they wrote?
Ok.
Do you think PhD chemists can tell the difference between red paint and thermite?
After viewing that report, I started to wonder -- that's why I'm asking what they did to specifically rule it out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
