Reply With Quote
So ing what? Chrissakes, man. Go rub one out.
Perhaps clean yourself up and take a female out to dinner and a movie.
Renovations were being done to the WTC the year prior to 911 now proven
Posted April 21st, 2009 by sentinel
All the pieces are falling together nicely .
Turner Construction, who supervised the 2000 demolition of the Seattle Kingdome, participated in the post-9/11 Ground Zero clean-up and performed extensive renovations within the World Trade Center towers just prior to 9/11, was in fact performing unspecified renovation work throughout the WTC complex until the very morning of September 11, 2001.
The Port Authority of NY/NJ now claims that records describing such work or other projects were destroyed on September 11, 2001. A December 2000 WTC property assessment described required renovation work to be completed within one year, upon steel columns within elevator shafts* of both WTC towers that was immediately pending or already underway.
Terror devastates A/E/C firms
12 employees of Turner Construction were located in an office in the third subbasement of Tower 1**, the north tower. Turner had been performing renovation work in various parts of the center and had occupied various office spaces.
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/90526
*According to engineer Gordon Ross
According to engineer Gordon Ross, the explosives were placed on the core columns NEXT TO THE ELEVATOR SHAFTS.
Please see this video:
Gordon Ross' WTC demolition presentation - June 8, 2007
http://www.911blogger.com/node/9840
**New Eyewitness To WTC Basement Level Explosions
Saltalamacia describes "grenade" like bombs, backs up William Rodriguez' story, numerous others that were ignored by 9/11 Commission
Prison Planet | October 12, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson
A new eyewitness who was working in the WTC on 9/11 has gone on record to describe how he heard multiple grenade-like explosions around the basement levels of the north tower, backing up William Rodriguez' story, the WTC janitor who reported explosions before the first plane hit the tower.
Anthony Saltalamacia was a morning supervisor who managed over a hundred workers in the twin towers. He worked closely with WTC janitor William Rodriguez, eyewitness to sub-level explosions that occurred before the impact of the first plane in the north tower and representative for many 9/11 victim's families.
Saltalamacchia was in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower, approximately 1,100 feet below the airplane's impact point at floors 93 to 98.
(Article Continues Below)
http://www.infowars.com/articles/sep...explosions.htm
So ing what? Chrissakes, man. Go rub one out.
Perhaps clean yourself up and take a female out to dinner and a movie.
Wanted for questioning.
If they are still alive, those are good people to question. We might find a whistleblower.
Wanted for questioning.
Have you really read John Locke, or are you that bat stupid?
Ah, the life of the paranoid. And yes, I have.
What are his five legitimate reasons for revolution?
Hint - Locke's five reasons for revolution are used as the organizing principle for the bulk of the Declaration of Independence.
what are Galileo's five legitimate reasons for posting conspiracy theories on a daily basis?
Hint - .....
actually I really don't know why anyone would want to try to continue spreading lies.
The problem is, one has to accept your alleged conspiracy as true, which ultimately bases its support on its conclusion. Such is the way of most conspiracy theories. We know there is a secret cabal, ergo, let's arrange the facts such that they fit the theory and exclude those which do not. Call it the Iraq approach (well, it fits most American invasions and interventions, but I digress). When you start with the facts and actually let the theory fit them instead of the other way around, you realize that you are ting on Galileo Galilei's memory.
Explain how scientists finding thermite in the WTC rubble is a theory. They found it.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=79419
It should be noted that Mr Ross has no first-hand knowledge of explosives at the WTC center. The above poorly-written statement implies this.
Better:
According to engineer Gordon Ross' theory of explosive demolition, he believes explosives were placed on the core columns NEXT TO THE ELEVATOR SHAFTS.
Hold the presses everybody! Renovations were being done on a 30 year old office buildings complex with hundreds of thousands of square feet of office space.
This just in to Conspiracy Central:
"Man makes sandwich, 9-11 is a lie"
"Dog scoots on butt, if the explosives fit, you must acquit."
"Skyscaper has wiring, it must have been for explosives."
What compels you guys to respond to this nutbag?
Actually most of his threads are spectacularly funny examples of logical fail.
I might give it one or two satirical posts, but generally leave them alone after that, as they aren't really worth it.
I save it all for the "Real" 9-11 thread, as that is better than a bazillion spam threads like this one.
He must be some kind of masochist if he enjoys the level of ownage he gets on this forum.
I'm not sure he realizes the level of ownage he gets on this forum....
he keeps on shouting "you lose"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
