Do you always wipe your ass with the cons ution? Or just when you ignorantly think you're making a correct analogy?
Never mind...you answered the question in your post.
After perusing the child pornography forums, I can tell you that there was a powerful movement in the pedophile community during the election to get Obama elected. Their main concern had something to do with finally having kids in the White House.
Do you always wipe your ass with the cons ution? Or just when you ignorantly think you're making a correct analogy?
Never mind...you answered the question in your post.
I thought it was sly, what?
the "racist swing vote" is why Obama won? well, if the racists are why obama won, and obama is dividing the nation, aren't the racists really at fault for dividing the nation?
Last edited by Oh, Gee!!; 04-21-2009 at 07:43 PM.
lemme guess, the boys from brazil are responsible for obama being elected
The black population on our country mostly disappeared from two main causes:
1) They were sent to the frontline (cannon fodder) on the numerous armed conflicts we had back in the 1800's.
2) The yellow fever epidemic of 1871
The official stance of Argentina for most of WWII was neutral, because it created the better commercial opportunities, however, the military government in charge favored the Axis powers mostly because of the close ties with Mussolini. Towards the end of the war, Argentina actually entered the Allies side, since, again, that stance gave it better commercial opportunities.
And lastly, yes, Juan Peron, who had close ties with Mussolini, shepherded what is to be presumed about 300 Nazi war criminals into the country.
Those were indeed dark times for our country.
I did not support going to Iraq in the first place. I just didn't buy the snakeoil Powell was selling in the UN. And I did prefer Obama to win. I say 'prefer', because I'm not allowed to vote yet, so I couldn't support my preference with a vote.
Now, as far as this actual topic is concerned, I'm gonna have to pass. I simply don't know enough about the whole white supremacist movement (other than the bare basics), from both a historical or political standpoint to opine about it.
By all means...remain as ignorant as you want on subjects, it's what makes America great, but the problem is when you choose to remain ignorant while simulatensouly thinking yourself an expert...
if "bad-analogy-crafting" is akin to wiping one's ass with 200-year-old parchment, you must have one terribly chafed ass.
So whottt's contention is that Obama is uniting America.
He must be if he has the Klan (and other such groups whottt likes to visit on the internets) supporting him.
America is not a nation-state. Its unity is not derived from shared ethnicity, creed, or culture. Its unity ideally is derived from shared belief in political principles of liberty, democracy, equality, etc.
Except that we don't actually have any shared belief in political principles anymore.
So we don't really have any unity. What we have is a powerful state and popular inertia. We're like one of those sprawling, multi-ethnic empires, i.e. the Romans, Byzantines, Austrians, Russians, etc. Throw in enough economic turmoil and the whole thing will collapse.
Economic turmoil is guaranteed because it's planly obvious to the most casual observer that the United States will no longer be able to service its debt within the next 20-30 years. At that point, we'll splinter into half a dozen or more successor states which will go to war with one another.
Don't blame it on Obama.
5...4...3...2...1...before someone calls someone else a Nazi in this thread.
And that is how we will know this thread is officially dead, by Godwin's law.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)