Reply With Quote
She was praising his supporters.
Ron Paul Is Praised By Hillary Clinton
Posted by Lew Rockwell at April 22, 2009 07:10 PM
(not a joke)
WATCH THE VIDEO!
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewr...es/026449.html
She was praising his supporters.
sweet sweet validation
nice.
Hmmm....5 posts in the thread and no 'see, I told yew he wuz a liberal' comments yet.
I think she wants him to run again to take votes away from the republican candidate again.
Feh, Alan Keyes got more votes than Ron Paul.
If Democrats really want to take votes away from Republicans, they should encourage Palin to run in 2012.
I think that was covered back when he was declared a crazy nutjob.
glass houses...
Whose blog said he was a crazy nutjob?
Yeah, he actually believes the Cons ution is valid.
Perhaps in a couple states.
Nationwide popular vote results:
Alan Keyes- 47,768
Ron Paul- 41,905
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2008/2008presgeresults.pdf
You didn't count the votes in the primaries. RP didn't run for president in the general election.
I wasn't talking about the primaries, so I naturally left them out.
He lost those pretty soundly as well.
Though not to Keyes.
you're right, keyes got beat pretty bad by Paul in the primaries.
Again, if you want to talk about the primaries, enjoy yourself.
You know I wasn't.
Actually it's pretty hard to tell you were talking about the presidential race. You just said that RP got less votes than Alan Keyes.
Sorry about that.
Let it be known throughout the land that I was indeed talking about the popular vote in the 2008 presidential election as clearly illustrated by the numbers and link to the results of the popular vote in the 2008 presidential election I posted.
I apologize for any confusion.
Good Lord, you posted that AFTER you said Alan Keyes got more votes.
I posted the actual popular vote results four minutes before anyone said anything about the primaries.
Why should there be any confusion after that?
I would really love to leave this thread alone but whatever
At 5:08 you say, "Feh, Alan Keyes got more votes than Ron Paul."---Could mean primaries, foxnews.com popularity contest, presidential election, who knows
You post the numbers then Galileo says those are the presidential numbers, which are irrelevant since RP pulled out long before the election.
At 6:53 you say, "Again, if you want to talk about the primaries, enjoy yourself. You know I wasn't."
So how is anyone supposed to know you were talking about the presidential numbers at the beginning when you said Keyes got more votes than RP? It's really not a valid point anyway---most of those votes were likely write-ins.
Good points.
Was RP even on any ballots in November? Maybe as a third party in Montana or something. Were Ron Paul write-in votes ever counted in all 50 states?
I apologized for any misunderstanding.
Feel free to make excuses for Paul -- he was a fringe candidate no matter how you slice it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
