Scott Foster
Mike Callahan
Zach Zarba
Which looks OK, considering that Salvatore is working in New Orleans tonight as well as this info from the Joey thread courtesy of FromWayDowntown:
Also, all three officials are among the least "homer" refs in the NBA
http://www.covers.com/pageLoader/pag...feree_ats.html
Solid
I like Callahan, usually he's pretty fair.
Foster is iffy at times but more often than not solid as well.
Only on a Spurs forum...![]()
How bout them heat?
I'm just glad I don't see crawford in there.
The officials should not be part of discussion, but the wild variances in referee performances that are evident when watching the NBA make it so.
For example, early in today's game, Tim Duncan will try to establish low post position against Dampier. Dampier will try to use his strength to keep Duncan as far from basket as possible. Quite frankly, I don't know the exact language in the rulebook that governs allowable defensive contact for post defenders. What I do know is the Duncan/Dampier contest will have a predictable amount of contact. Sometimes it is allowed and sometimes it is called a foul. If it is allowed, the Mavs chances of victory improve. If Dampier gets two quick fouls, then the Spurs chances of victory improve.
Then when you add the fact that at least two referees in this league have ejected Duncan from games only to see the league overturn the decision when reviewed, you get discussions about referees.
I sincerely hope that when we review the rest of the games in this series there will be no discussion of controversial calls, or worse, league suspensions.
You don't know much about officials are you?
This board always brings every aspect of the game. Refs are part of the game and there are diferences in officiating games by fdiferent refs.
Clever
Exactly
I know officials call the game and there is nothing you can do about it...so why worry, , or complain about it before, or after, the game?
It's stipulated. Some refs can be more gullible. If you have a young refs, they are usually trigger happy. If the Barry/Fisher no call had a different ref or if Barry would have drawn the foul more the outcome could have been different. It's relative. Something that only player can keep in the back of their minds. For us it is just jibberjabber.
Theres an X button in the upper right hand corner you can click if it really bothers you that much also-ran.
Yeah, don't ever do that......
owned
That doesn't look like blaming or crying about officiating to me...just pointing out the star level that Wade had reached (with video proof), which most NBA fans agree with (ie, D-whistle). I even stated my position in the first sentence...
Read the entire thread and you'll see that some got my point, but many re s did not...
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44478
The Mavs blew that series and I've always maintained that position...I could go back and find a dozen posts by me saying that if I cared to do so...
Last edited by LEONARD; 04-25-2009 at 11:32 AM.
I'm not going to argue about what cons utes worrying or complaining. You will notice that I quoted your entire post, including the parts that you reference and did not selectively quote as you did to support your point.
My point actually echoes your 2006 post; the officiating in the NBA is often so bizarre it becomes part of the conversation. Its why betting sites like covers.com include referee stats as important game information. It would be better if the officiating were an always invisible, always neutral factor. But its not.
So we talk about it. On Spurs forums and Mavs forums, in 2009 and 2006.
See, I wrote the above before you edited your post with the re reference. I could edit mine in a similar fashion. Not worth it.
My entire original post doesn't tell the story, which is why I linked to the thread above...
My picking and choosing in this thread was sarcastic in nature...
Perhaps I need to adjust my sarcasm detector, it usually works.
Just to be sure, it's OK to talk about the refs, but whining and blaming losses on the officiating is weak.
*sarcasm*
Weak, yes...
Talking about refs is fine I suppose, but when I see people on this forum ing before game 3 about Crawford, it's a bit much. And then to see people justify the loss because Pop knew they were up against long odds because of the officials, it's just![]()
OK then
Btw, I've never been on a Mavs board. For MavFan, who is their Joey?
Not a clue...I just don't really pay attention to the refs. I know who Crawford and Bavetta are but that's it...
I've spent about 5 min's on a Mavs forum before getting extremely beaten down and leaving...
I've always wondered why a Mavs fan spends so much time on a Spurs forum, now I know.
Spurs fans are amusing...
There are a decent amount of Mavs fans here...
MMA forum![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)