Reply With Quote
He got to the finals in what was one of the weakest conferences in NBA history.
He got to the finals with the presence of Deke and Eric snow as their PG. The year after or before, the nets made it to the finals and got swept the lakers. The east was extremely weak during the 3 peat.
He got to the finals in what was one of the weakest conferences in NBA history.
And he beat a team in game 1 that no one in the West could touch. Iverson was an incredible player who is acting like an ass now that his skills have declined.
you really don't know which way your ><><><> should go.
Thinking Iverson is worse than Marbury is beyond stupid.
Three-quarters of the Kings' losses were by less than 7 points, as was one to the Spurs.
That the Spurs were blown out in the other three games doesn't make them "untouchable."
dude in '01 the lakers only lost like 2 games. thats as close to 'untouchable' as it gets
15-1 wasn't some kind of accident or the team getting lucky.
The Lakers were a very, very good team. But any one win or loss has a large element of chance.
The Philadelphia 76ers were not the best team the Lakers faced that postseason, by a lot. That their close finish resulted in a Lakers loss and the close finishes involving the Kings and Spurs resulted in a Lakers win does not give them anything except a moral victory on the way to their actual backdoor sweep.
i think you lost all right to contradict others as you tried making a valid comparison of hakeem and wallace.
Nobody is denying talent or acheivements, which iverson wins. Marbury can at least take a hit for his team. Not to mention a lot of the problems were probably stirred up by one of the worst coaches in NBA history, thomas.
Here are my reasons. I can tell you right now, that Iverson can make his team better. I don't want my 6 ft guard taking 20+ shots every game, the nuggets going to the 2nd seed (also to do with billups) without him is a clear testament. Iverson can play the facilitator role like all those of his size have since the dawn of the game. He chooses not to. Ok, lets let that one slide. He wouldn't take a seat coming of the bench initially, so hamilton being the great fellow he is did. What was the result? They played horrid. Once hamilton starts and its iverson's time to make a sacrifice he simple...can't. The man is the epitome of selfishness. The type of player that can be content night in and out if he gets his way, completely disregrding the needs of the team. He watched his team get swept and man handled when he could have been out there helping. Please don't give me your nonsense, sometimes talent isn't always what decides who i want on my team.
LOL That's friggin harsh.
there is a valid comparison as defenders, even if you are too stupid to get it.
4 DPOY trophies for Wallace.
SI ranks Hakeem #5 and Wallace #7 as best playoff defenders of all time.
http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.c...7/12/index.htm
you lose again, but keep trying.
well then Iverson wins, dumbass.Nobody is denying talent or acheivements, which iverson wins.
what hit has Marbury taken for his team?Marbury can at least take a hit for his team. Not to mention a lot of the problems were probably stirred up by one of the worst coaches in NBA history, thomas.
you only talked about the 2009 version of AI and said nothing of Marbury. What do you think Marbury has done throughout his career? did you just start watching the NBA last week?Here are my reasons. I can tell you right now, that Iverson can make his team better. I don't want my 6 ft guard taking 20+ shots every game, the nuggets going to the 2nd seed (also to do with billups) without him is a clear testament. Iverson can play the facilitator role like all those of his size have since the dawn of the game. He chooses not to. Ok, lets let that one slide. He wouldn't take a seat coming of the bench initially, so hamilton being the great fellow he is did. What was the result? They played horrid. Once hamilton starts and its iverson's time to make a sacrifice he simple...can't. The man is the epitome of selfishness. The type of player that can be content night in and out if he gets his way, completely disregrding the needs of the team. He watched his team get swept and man handled when he could have been out there helping. Please don't give me your nonsense, sometimes talent isn't always what decides who i want on my team.
goddamn you are one fock ed piece of rocket .
just keep letting Hakeem whisper in your ear how he's the greatest NBA player of all time while you suck on his dreamshake
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
