I'd take Avery Johnson over Pop.
People are just lashing out and venting. It's what they do. They take it the extreme sometimes.
I'd take Avery Johnson over Pop.
I understand that, but this Pop hatred has been going on for awhile.
It's sad how fans of other teams see what some Spurs fans can't.
Everytime this team loses ten topics ting on Pop appear. Its pretty pathetic.
I'd take PJ for next season and leave a Pop resting and have him back for 2010/2011
I hope we see George Hill get more playing time next year. The kid has real potential.
Pop seriously needs to drop his "veterans first" ideology. Go get us some young legs, and some guys who can actually hit a wide-the- -open jumper.
It's been going on since Pop was the coach. It's what Spurs fans do after losses. Blame Pop. Blame Tony. Blame (whatever shooter sucked for the night).
If you mean that Pop's the biggest reason why San Antonio has four les and not five or six, then I'm inclined to agree. If you mean that Pop's the biggest reason the Spurs even have four, then I'd submit that Tim Duncan might take issue with that if he lacked the class to ignore such a ing ignorant comment.
Say what you want about the greatness of Tim Duncan, but your team doesn't win 4 les without a great coach like Popovich. A championship team can exist with great on-court leadership, but a dynasty (or semi-dynasty or whatever you consider the Spurs to be) can't exist without an excellent coach who can create an unwavering defensive iden y for his team. The only coach in the league who probably could have won more than 4 rings with this squad is Phil Jackson, and that's extremely debatable.
But I'll concede that Tim Duncan is equally as important. Not more so.
This team has zero les without Tim Duncan. Zero. None. Not one. It's a ing insult to Duncan to make any kind of implication otherwise.
Now let's clarify some of my observations about Popovich, as I'm likely to be questioned about it going forward:
Pop did an absolutely excellent job of developing the defensive mentality of this squad since he's been here. The courage to start intangible guys like Bowen or Nesterovic when most people wouldn't be able to see past their box scores cannot be overstated.
His complete lack of panic in any situation created much of the mindset this team has had during deep playoff runs and critical end of game situations.
He brought in young guys like Charles Smith and Stephen Jackson and Devin Brown and Manu and Parker and gave them some rope to earn their way into the rotation, and got quality minutes from vets by not overplaying them.
Every season he played around with the rosters to find combinations of guys that played well together and solidified the rotations somewhere between the all-star break and March, usually resulting in a big winning streak as the Spurs ratcheted down their defense. By the playoffs the Spurs were honed to a fine edge on both sides of the ball.
Three of the last four years, those things haven't been so certain. I've said I don't want to see Pop leave the organization, but the change the last few years has been a marked departure from the formula, and those of us that notice it are concerned.
i like this thread, and this post was very well put. pop is staying so everybody needs to get over it
He's a genius when they win and an idiot when they lose. Such is life at SpursTalk.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)