Reply With Quote
Sent
okNo sir, it's the actor who is playing Jacob. PM you?
Sent
thanks, now i have to give that precious information to many people.
All these years, I wondered "Who the is Jacob"?Didn't you think it was Christian the first time they showed him?
i had many theories about jacob, i thought he was aaron, walt, christian, richard...All these years, I wondered "Who the is Jacob"?
You could have just said Daniel is wrong. Smart guy.
just a reminder that this should be a spoiler-free thread.
I went through the whole spoiler-reading phase and it completely ruined some of the better episodes of the series.
Imagine going to see 'The Sixth Sense', only the le is changed to 'Hey, Isn't that Donny from New Kids on the Block That Just Killed Bruce Willis?"
Since this thread has evolved into a discussion of the just aired episode, how can there even BE spoilers here? If people are discussing events to come, it's conjecture. If you missed the episode, DON'T READ THIS THREAD.
Well, just the whole 'I know who Jacob is' discussion.
I now know of a couple of the show's characters that are not him.All these years, I wondered "Who the is Jacob"?
So for those that don't read spoilers, do you think Jack and Kate are going to follow through on Daniel's plan and change the future?
sorry about that, i won't do that again
Actually, you know what some people here think about who Jacob is. Since the iden y of Jacob hasn't been revealed yet, and Lost is a giant mind , Jacob could wind up being any of those characters you didn't think, any of the ones you did think, or the Giant Spaghetti Monster.
On the other hand, if you don't want us to discuss what we think because maybe you hadn't thought of it yet, well, go away. This is in fact a thread to discuss Lost and our thoughts or projections of what might happen.
My friend commented on this, but I think it had to do with the fact that he had such little time (6hrs) to prevent "the incident". Here's the one observation my friend made that was hilarious...
Why did they need guns? It seems like everytime they grab guns something crazy or terrible happens. I mean, clearly if the Others want to kill you, your gun will do nothing to stop them.
So I'm "+1" on your point.
Eloise believes in "destiny". Her thought on time is that nothing changes and everything happens for a reason.
Daniel did not think that and maybe you do not think that...but that was Eloise's driving force....so she knew she HAD to have Daniel and that's what pushed her to be what she was in that episode...a stubborn, pushy mother.
Point taken.
I wasn't trying to start an argument, my post probably came off the wrong way. There's nothing I want more than the speculation and discussion that this thread has been consistently providing.
I don't want, in any way, to hinder, stop, or censor any poster's contributions to what is one of my favorite threads here.
sorry about that, i won't do that againI should definitely be more careful in the way I word things. I wasn't angry. I was just being a baby. I apologize.
I should definitely be more careful in the way I word things. I wasn't angry. I was just being a baby. I apologize.
I should definitely be more careful in the way I word things. I wasn't angry. I was just being a baby. I apologize.
got that one
didn't catch that oneIf Faraday dies in his own "present," after telling Jack and Kate a few minutes beforehand, "hey, any of us could die!" in an episode where they finish telling Daniel's backstory and show us his mother getting all emotional about sacrificing him, it gives us clues that we can go ahead and order the flower arrangement.
golly, I guess not.Do you really know what you think you know about Jacob?
you must either be a writer for the show, an Other or a super genius that is better than the rest of us.
when i was talking about Christian being dead in a different way, Christian said he could not help Locke up after he fell down the well.
Locke actually offered to help Ben up out of the hole in the temple.
Locke and Christian so far are not dead/alive in the same way. You being the super genius you are, should be able to figure that out.
Everything I tell you, I tell you for the good of the Island.
I don't think the writers foreshadowed exactly what the nature of Locke's resurrection would be. I wasn't sure whether he would be Jacob's mouthpiece, or Christian's mouthpiece, or what. I wasn't sure whether he would be an apparition or flesh and blood.
I can only discern what the writers tell me. Well, them and Jacob.
Does anyone post @ The Fuselage? Those are some serious fans of the show!
I'm hoping for some guyliner backstory next episode, or another Locke centric episode.
http://www.accesshollywood.com/lost-..._article_17393
LOST Producers Talk Surprising Death
LAST UPDATED: April 30, 2009 5:53 PM EDT
LOS ANGELES, Calif. --
“Lost” celebrated its 100th episode on Wednesday night with the death of a very important character – and producers Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof told TV Guide in a new interview that the death had launched the “the start of the final chapter of the entire series.”
(SPOILER ALERT: Stop if you haven’t seen the 100th episode!)
In the episode, Daniel Faraday – the time-travel expert physicist played by Jeremy Davies – returned to the island in 1977 from the Dharma Initiative’s headquarters in Michigan. Thinking that he and the Oceanic 6 were “variables” who could change the future, he tried to track down his mother, Eloise Hawking – only to be shot by her in the Others’ camp at the episode’s conclusion.
“It was an incredibly painful thing to kill this beloved character,” Carlton told TV Guide. “But we feel that’s what this show has to do. His death is kind of the culminating event in the entire season. It really ends one chapter and commences the start of the final chapter of the entire series. Once we explained that to Jeremy, while he was personally saddened that his full-time status on ‘Lost’ was coming to an end, he put the story above his own personal self.”
Damon seconded Carlton’s emotions, adding that Jeremy had taken the news well.
“When Carlton and I called Jeremy to explain what was going to be happening with Faraday, we’ve never had a more awesome exit interview with somebody on the show,” he said.
The character of the quirky scientist, who was introduced in Season 4, became a fan favorite, and the producers were quick to praise Jeremy’s work on the show.
“For us, Faraday really was the cornerstone of the fifth season – he really shined,” Damon said. “I can’t imagine what Season 5 would have looked like without Jeremy Davies. When you think about all the crazy stuff that had to come out of that guy’s mouth, for him to be as interesting and emotional and poetic as he was is really extraordinary.”
He’ll be missed by his castmates as well, though he may not be done with “Lost” – Carlton only said Jeremy’s “full-time” status was over, and dead characters have been known to reappear on the show.
“[He was] a great sensitive guy who got deep into his character. He really lived it,” Michael Emerson, who plays Ben Linus, told the mag.
And while his on-screen character was discouraged from playing piano by his disapproving mother, Jeremy had no problem bringing his tunes to the set.
“Most actors walk around with headphones, but Jeremy would walk around holding a miniature boom box,” Terry O’Quinn, who plays John Locke, added. “He always wanted to provide music for everyone — whether they wanted it or not.”
Copyright 2009 by NBC Universal, Inc. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
La la la la, I don't hear that.
they just verified Faraday's death.....that's it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions