Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 145
  1. #1
    99/03/05/07/14 Spurs Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    27,510


    Stephen Jackson | SG/SF
    Born: 05/04/1978
    Height: 6-8 / 2,03
    Weight: 215 lbs. / 97,5 kg.
    High School: Oak Hill Academy (Mouth of Wilson, VA)
    Years Pro: 8

    info

    2008-09 Statistics
    PPG 20,7 RPG 5,10 APG 6,5 EFF + 19,51
    Last edited by Bruno; 08-25-2012 at 02:54 PM.

  2. #2
    Spurs in Oz mattyc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    2,042
    Extremely likeable/hateable guy, depending on what way you look at life. I personally love him and would love him to come back to the Spurs after his stints in Indy, Atlanta and GSW. That said, I'd think it's extremely unlikely to occur.



    He is a balla though...


  3. #3
    Pop? GooberNuts's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    267
    I'd like to have him back, but this is not going to happen.

  4. #4
    Suck One Pop poop's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,157
    flattest nose since scottie pippen.

  5. #5
    January Championship Banner? td4mvp21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    7,088
    I still want SJax back on the Spurs.

  6. #6
    Veteran tomtom's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    1,859
    Nice guy but he turns over the ball more than ginobili does

  7. #7
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    Have been in favor of bringing him back since 2004.

    Slight possibility you could get it done, but doubtfull.

  8. #8
    Veteran roycrikside's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    1,525
    What's his salary/contract status? I think the Warriors (and Jackson) are open to a change of scenery. They want to go young and I think they prefer Randolph to be a SF rather than a PF.

    They already have Maggette, Ellis, Bellinelli, Crawfod, Morrow as well, a lot of swingmen types. Outside of money, I think SJax would love to be a Spur again.

  9. #9
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    I'd much rather have him than RJeff. He makes $7M less ($7.65M), knows the system inside and out, and has balls the size of cannon shot.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    I'd much rather have him than RJeff. He makes $7M less ($7.65M), knows the system inside and out, and has balls the size of cannon shot.
    Yeah but his contract goes up a million every year and he would be on the books til 2013.

    I rather trade for a bigger contract for just 1 or 2 more years.

  11. #11
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Yeah but his contract goes up a million every year and he would be on the books til 2013.

    I rather trade for a bigger contract for just 1 or 2 more years.
    ? So, you'd rather spend big bucks for a year or two on an unknown quan y in our system, rather than signing a system knowledgable, knockdown 3 point shooter, clutch playoff performer for 4 more seasons? Whatever. Getting Jax STILL leaves SA with $12.5M in 2010 caproom according to the figures in the "2010 plan" thread in this sub-forum. Getting Jax back now would be like getting Horry at 31.

  12. #12
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    ? So, you'd rather spend big bucks for a year or two on an unknown quan y in our system, rather than signing a system knowledgable, knockdown 3 point shooter, clutch playoff performer for 4 more seasons? Whatever. Getting Jax STILL leaves SA with $12.5M in 2010 caproom according to the figures in the "2010 plan" thread in this sub-forum. Getting Jax back now would be like getting Horry at 31.
    And if we resign Manu you can forget having capspace in 2010 or 2011 to add a significant player.

  13. #13
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    why
    manu should not make more then the mle

  14. #14
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    101,216
    I want him SJax back


    We need his badasness

  15. #15
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    All those ing about Manu can't ask for SJax to be back.

  16. #16
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    And if we resign Manu you can forget having capspace in 2010 or 2011 to add a significant player.
    You think someone is actually going to sign here? Someone of consequence, one of those 3-4 players they mention when they talk about when they mention 2010?

  17. #17
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    You think someone is actually going to sign here? Someone of consequence, one of those 3-4 players they mention when they talk about when they mention 2010?
    I rather have that possibility available than ruin that possibility by trading for a guy that's past his prime and has 5 more years on his contract.

  18. #18
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    I rather have that possibility available than ruin that possibility by trading for a guy that's past his prime and has 5 more years on his contract.
    Four more years on his contract, he's clutch as , and never has relied on his quickness or hops. Jack could easily play to 37 or 38 in this league.

    I'm beginning to come around to the "we won't be able to rebuild on the fly" crowd. Surround Tim with players to give him a chance to win for the next 3 years. Worry about later later.

  19. #19
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    I rather have that possibility available than ruin that possibility by trading for a guy that's past his prime and has 5 more years on his contract.
    How can the same guy who advocates trading for RJ be concerned about the cap killing effects of a player who makes 6.5M less than RJ?

  20. #20
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    I'd much rather have him than RJeff. He makes $7M less ($7.65M), knows the system inside and out, and has balls the size of cannon shot.
    Most definitely. The Warriors are likely to move one of Maggette, Crawford or SJax. They'll try to find takers for Crawford first, but if they get to the point of offering SJax it would have to be tempting for the Spurs.

  21. #21
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    I agree with ex. It's time for the prodigal son to return. Who cares what his contract looks like? The Spurs will be rebuilding primarily through picks once TD hangs it up. I'd rather have Jack for the next 2 years than Richard Jefferson.

  22. #22
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    how can the same guy who advocates trading for rj be concerned about the cap killing effects of a player who makes 6.5m less than rj?
    +1

  23. #23
    It is what it is. Mark in Austin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    4,010
    Was Jack a Don Nelson guy or a Chris Mullin guy? If he's a Nelson guy, I doubt he's going anywhere unless either:
    1. Ownership is short on money and a desire to dump salary overrides the Rasputin-like effect Nelson has on them.
    2. Nelson has turned on him like he often does with his players.

  24. #24
    99/03/05/07/14 Spurs Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    27,510
    Oberto + Bruce for Jax works

    It'll depend if Warriors want to save money or not

  25. #25
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Was Jack a Don Nelson guy or a Chris Mullin guy? If he's a Nelson guy, I doubt he's going anywhere unless either:
    1. Ownership is short on money and a desire to dump salary overrides the Rasputin-like effect Nelson has on them.
    2. Nelson has turned on him like he often does with his players.
    Even if he's a Nelson guy, Don's about ready to hang it up soon. And Pop's a Nelson guy, too.

    The more I look at this, especially compared to other veteran swingman that could potentially be on the market, SJax could be the best target for the Spurs. Just think about replacing Fin in the starting line-up with SJax.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •