Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 58
  1. #1
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    ...corroborated.

    As if the word of a Democrat who gave $10,000 to Democrat causes wasn't enough to convince other Democrats he was being truthful; others are coming forward and complaining of the White House's mafioso style politics.


    New Allegations Of White House Threats Over Chrysler

  2. #2
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,012
    Politics ain't beanbag.

  3. #3
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,012
    Wah.

  4. #4
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,012
    Yoni hates that Obama got tough with a deadbeat on the dole.

  5. #5
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,012
    I suppose he'd prefer to make all of Chrysler's creditors and bondholders whole on our dime.

  6. #6
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,012
    God forbid Obama should economize on the bailout, or try to convince creditors/bondholders to take a haircut.

  7. #7
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    God forbid Obama should economize on the bailout, or try to convince creditors/bondholders to take a haircut.
    While handing over the piggy bank to the UAW?

    Not only is he possibly cir venting the "takings clause" of the 5th amendment, he's doing so to pay political cronies.

    It looks like the financial sector has had enough of Obamanomics.

  8. #8
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    I suppose he'd prefer to make all of Chrysler's creditors and bondholders whole on our dime.
    I'd like for the bankruptcy laws to be applied as written.

  9. #9
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Yoni hates that Obama got tough with a deadbeat on the dole.
    UAW is the deadbeat and he's rewarding them.

  10. #10
    keep asking questions George Gervin's Afro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    11,409
    Someone tell Yoni that the person making the claim has completely backed off his original claim of the WH threatening him...

  11. #11
    Veteran
    My Team
    Utah Jazz
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    7,778
    First off, Obama didn't threaten anyone. Especially in a "mafioso" style. Second, until you come up with something other than an "anonymous source" "who voted for Obama" from whatever "businessinsder.com" is... fail.

  12. #12
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,012
    UAW is the deadbeat and he's rewarding them.
    The big three signed the contracts. If they couldn't afford them, that's their bad judgment.

  13. #13
    Believe. FaithInOne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    754
    The cut Obama got government compared to the stockholder out of GM stock was pretty mafioso.

  14. #14
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,012
    I'd like for the bankruptcy laws to be applied as written.
    That's an honest take. I retract my strawman.

  15. #15
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,012
    The cut Obama got government compared to the stockholder out of GM stock was pretty mafioso.
    You object to attaching strings to government money?

    How generous of you, LockBeard.

  16. #16
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,012
    It looks like the financial sector has had enough of Obamanomics.
    It doesn't make any difference. They can cry all they want. Obama's just getting warmed up.

  17. #17
    Believe. FaithInOne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    754
    Obama treated the CAT dude really well.

    Kiss the ring !

  18. #18
    Believe. FaithInOne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    754
    At least Obama carried out the hit himself on GM's godfather.

  19. #19
    Believe. FaithInOne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    754
    And then he sits at the dinner table, aka press conference, and tells the American people he "asked" the companies to do this and that

  20. #20
    Believe. FaithInOne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    754
    It's not like he sent his attack dogs into Alaska to hunt down dirt on the rival syndicate.

  21. #21
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    It doesn't make any difference. They can cry all they want. Obama's just getting warmed up.
    Well, he may learn there are bigger fish than him in the pond...

    Barack Obama's lawless conduct in connection with the Chrysler bankruptcy is sending shock waves through the business community. It is important to understand what is happening here. Many think that Obama is merely engaging in crony capitalism, favoring his political supporters (most notably the Auto Workers Union) at the expense of others. That's true, of course, but it is much worse than that: Obama has tried to bully those who have not bought his favor--Chrysler's non-TARP secured creditors--into giving up their legal rights by threatening to use the powers of the White House to damage their businesses. This sort of lawlessness is common in some of the more corrupt Third World countries, but it is brand new to the United States.

    Business Insider headlines: "Hedge Funds Outraged At Obama Bullying But Also Cowering In Fear." It reproduces a letter written by Cliff Asness, managing partner of AQR Capital Management. Here are some excerpts:

    The President has just harshly castigated hedge fund managers for being unwilling to take his administration's bid for their Chrysler bonds. He called them "speculators" who were "refusing to sacrifice like everyone else" and who wanted "to hold out for the prospect of an unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout."

    The responses of hedge fund managers have been, appropriately, outrage, but generally have been anonymous for fear of going on the record against a powerful President .... Furthermore, one by one the managers and banks are said to be caving to the President's wishes out of justifiable fear. ...

    Here's a shock. When hedge funds, pension funds, mutual funds, and individuals, including very sweet grandmothers, lend their money they expect to get it back. However, they know, or should know, they take the risk of not being paid back. But if such a bad event happens it usually does not result in a complete loss. A firm in bankruptcy still has assets. It's not always a pretty process. Bankruptcy court is about figuring out how to most fairly divvy up the remaining assets based on who is owed what and whose contracts come first. The process already has built-in partial protections for employees and pensions, and can set lenders' contracts aside in order to help the company survive, all of which are the rules of the game lenders know before they lend. But, without this recovery process nobody would lend to risky borrowers. Essentially, lenders accept less than shareholders (means bonds return less than stocks) in good times only because they get more than shareholders in bad times.

    The above is how it works in America, or how it's supposed to work. The President and his team sought to avoid having Chrysler go through this process, proposing their own plan for re-organizing the company and partially paying off Chrysler's creditors. Some bond holders thought this plan unfair. Specifically, they thought it unfairly favored the United Auto Workers, and unfairly paid bondholders less than they would get in bankruptcy court. So, they said no to the plan and decided, as is their right, to take their chances in the bankruptcy process. But, as his quotes above show, the President thought they were being unpatriotic or worse.

    Let's be clear, it is the job and obligation of all investment managers, including hedge fund managers, to get their clients the most return they can. They are allowed to be charitable with their own money, and many are spectacularly so, but if they give away their clients' money to share in the "sacrifice", they are stealing. ...

    The President's attempted diktat takes money from bondholders and gives it to a labor union that delivers money and votes for him. ... Shaking down lenders for the benefit of political donors is recycled corruption and abuse of power. ...

    Last but not least, the President screaming that the hedge funds are looking for an unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout is the big lie writ large. Find me a hedge fund that has been bailed out. Find me a hedge fund, even a failed one, that has asked for one. In fact, it was only because hedge funds have not taken government funds that they could stand up to this bullying. The TARP recipients had no choice but to go along. The hedge funds were singled out only because they are unpopular, not because they behaved any differently from any other ethical manager of other people's money. The President's comments here are backwards and libelous.
    Bullying, lying and lawless: President Obama has achieved a sort of trifecta of dishonor in connection with the Chrysler cram-down.
    It may be his undoing...

    There are as many wealthy Democrats - with overseas assets and common stock in the companies he's picking on - as there are Republicans.

  22. #22
    Believe. FaithInOne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    754
    Some bald white dude who questioned me on redistribution of wealth, my goons ing ravished him. What a putz!

  23. #23
    Believe. FaithInOne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    754
    Kramer!? You don't ing snitch on blood Kramer!

  24. #24
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Someone tell Yoni that the person making the claim has completely backed off his original claim of the WH threatening him...
    Uh, no he didn't...he said he had no comment but that if we kept pressing, the truth would come out.

    I suspect there were more threats dealt to his client who told him to shut the up.

    There are also reports of death threats...

    I know, this is hard to find in the American media...

  25. #25
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    Yoni hates that Obama got tough with a deadbeat on the dole.
    Creditors are deadbeats? Exactly what egregious sin have they committed, other than agreeing to float Chrysler a loan when Chrysler asked them for one?

    I suppose he'd prefer to make all of Chrysler's creditors and bondholders whole on our dime.
    The creditors aren't asking to be made whole. They're asking to be treated fairly and they're not. Fiat gets 20% of the company without having to s out one dollar of their own money. The UAW makes some concessions, but nothing near the 70% haircut the creditors are supposed to take, and they end up owning 55% of the company. The creditors put $7 billion of their own money in, yet despite having all the bankruptcy laws say that they come first they're supposed to just take 29 cents on the dollar and go away?

    God forbid Obama should economize on the bailout, or try to convince creditors/bondholders to take a haircut.
    How about instead of trying to cir vent the bankruptcy laws Obama just butt out and let bankruptcy take it's course? Or if he feels compelled to do something, how about looking for a solution that actually stands a chance of working? Chrysler lost $8 billion dollars last year. I'm pretty sure the annual interest payments Chrysler owes the creditors on their $6.9B worth of bonds don't add up to anything close to $8B.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •