Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 51
  1. #26
    HTTR Ditty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    7,205
    how bout no

  2. #27
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    Ariza is staying in LA. Deal with it.

  3. #28
    real fans go bald mountainballer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,238
    You think this is a good deal for both teams? SA likes it, sure (although it adds to their payroll). But why do the wolves do it? They are at a $51 Million payroll with 11 contracts including Miller. Who are they going to spend that salary cap space on this summer? They clearly lose on the talent side. What's the point for them?
    they might want to become a player in this years free agency. currently they are about 6 million under the cap, so they can't offer significantly more than any MLE team. but if they dump another 5 million, they will be.
    but I agree, the point for them isn't that great without some more teasers or more cap relieve or money. it's not that they are in troubles right now and Miller's contract expires 2010 anyhow. they might even want to check, if he fits better next season. it's not out of any question, that they also think of re signing him 2010, if he agrees to a reasonably priced contract, he will be just 30 next year and could play a veteran leader role for many more years.
    so IMO a trade before the 2010 deadline seems pretty unlikely, especially to the Spurs, who can't offer much. maybe there is a chance if they are willing to swallow a dead meat contract, like Madsen and send something useful for compensation.
    a deal of Mason+Fab+Bruce for Miller+Madsen.
    I guess now they listen. they still dump 4.4 million immediately and get a somehow useful rotation player, who compensates a bit for the loss of shooting ability from Miller.

    should the Spurs do this? sure, not even hesitate for a second. Miller is about 10 times as valuable as Mason.
    the great thing about a Miller acquisition would be, that other than many of the discussed options (like VC, Sjax) he doesn't need to be 1st, 2nd or 3rd option to be effective. and his size and versatility would allow to play him in many different line ups. even small ball PF isn't impossible.

  4. #29
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931
    I like Miller, but I doubt the Spurs would be frontrunners if he's on the block. We can't offer the Wolves much more than cap relief, however there are a few teams who can make a better offer than us. Say, Minny only want cap relief and don't care about getting equal talent ( which is the only case in which we have a chance to trade ), then they could do much better with the expiring partially guaranteed contract of Jerry Stackhouse for example.

    It seems like we could get him ( or other similar players ) only if we take back some bad contracts, anything else would be a master stroke by the FO if they manage to pull it ( Bowen + Oberto for Miller ).

  5. #30
    HTTR Ditty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    7,205
    Ariza is staying in LA. Deal with it.
    probably but rather have iverson then this guy

  6. #31
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    probably but rather have iverson then this guy
    Why is that?

  7. #32
    HTTR Ditty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    7,205
    i never liked miller since he left orlando

    i admit i rather take him right now over mason but i think our biggest need if the spurs are going with offense now then they would go with allen even if i would hate him to be here also

    still i have heard that ariza is on the top of the spurs list this summer i really hope the lakers cant afford him which most likely they wont so i still believe in ariza to come

  8. #33
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    i never liked miller since he left orlando

    i admit i rather take him right now over mason but i think our biggest need if the spurs are going with offense now then they would go with allen even if i would hate him to be here also

    still i have heard that ariza is on the top of the spurs list this summer i really hope the lakers cant afford him which most likely they wont so i still believe in ariza to come
    You would take Iverson over Miller?




































    God help us.

  9. #34
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    The Spurs will need a 3 since I don't expect them to bring Udoka back. Dealing Miller for Oberto and Bowen makes sense for Minnesota as that would save them $4 mil immediately. Miller isn't going to make them a playoff team so the Wolves could very well be interested in such a deal.

    Adding Miller and McDyess to a Spurs team with a healthy Manu, healthy TD, and Parker would be an immediate improvement. Miller rebounds well from the 3 spot and shoots the rock well. Yes, last year was a down year for him, but he still scored 10 and rebounded 6 and assisted 4 a night. I'd say he would have somewhat better stats in SA, at least for his FG% with the looks he'd get in SA.

    As Bruno pointed out, the Spurs have had interest in Miller before. Plus, there would be no commitment to him past 2009-10. This is definitely a trade that should interest both teams.

    And the Spurs would still have enough expiring contracts to use to find another advantageous trade.

  10. #35
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Do you think the Spurs would go that far into lux tax to get him and McDyess? I do not.

  11. #36
    Believe. Artest93's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    341
    Spurs need Ben Gordon, or Jamal Crawford

  12. #37
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Do you think the Spurs would go that far into lux tax to get him and McDyess? I do not.
    How far? They have enough space to use their MLE.

  13. #38
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    How far? They have enough space to use their MLE.
    Lets assume the Luxury tax is at 71M. Spurs, with 11 players currently under contract are at 70.3M. If they trade Bowen+Oberto for Miller they add 1M to that total and lose a player.

    So now they would be at 71M with 10 players. So now any part of the MLE they use will count as luxury tax dollar-for-dollar. Assuming McDyess commands the full MLE, that would be ~5.5M paid in luxury tax + ~3M profit sharing gone for a total of 8.5 total cost.

    That is a lot. Correct me if I am wrong. That would only be 11 players under contract as well.

  14. #39
    Veteran spursfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    3,698
    I was hoping we could get Brandon Roy...

  15. #40
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    995
    Do you think the Spurs would go that far into lux tax to get him and McDyess? I do not.
    I don't think they would either.

    The biggest problem is that McDyess shouldn't play starter minutes. He just isn't up to being a full time starter which was evident when he played with Detroit the last part of this year. Is he still a beast and would I still want him on this team? Yes, but not with starter minutes until the end of the year or in the playoffs.

  16. #41
    HTTR Ditty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    7,205
    You would take Iverson over Miller?




































    God help us.


    screw miller

  17. #42
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    miller is a pretty good hard nose player. i would slap the "pitbull" label on him that kenny smith uses. but he may be out of our price range.

  18. #43
    Feels bad man Mr.Bottomtooth's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    16,539
    I'm jumping onto the Miller-trade bandwagon.

  19. #44
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    choker in the playoffs.

    Not interested.

  20. #45
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    choker in the playoffs.

    Not interested.
    How many playoff games has he played in?

  21. #46
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    choker in the playoffs.

    Not interested.
    It's pretty hard to make a fair assessment about this when he has never played on a team that made it out of the first round...and all of it came his first five years in the league.

  22. #47
    real fans go bald mountainballer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,238
    choker in the playoffs.

    Not interested.
    oh, what sublime insight.

    well, in fact he played 5 PO series, 2 were decent, 3 not so much. like 2004. who did he have to deal with. oh, Bruce Bowen at his best.
    or 2006, when he was matched up with Josh Howard or Adrian Griffin.
    well, how big is the chance, that with this Spurs team, he would be guarded by the other teams Bruce Bowen?

  23. #48
    Veteran 45 bank shot's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    1,289
    wow, you compare him to Mason?
    not that Mason doesn't have any qualities, but Miller would be about three times the help that Mason is. and different to Mason, Miller CAN also play some back up point.
    I beg to differ. Whenz the last time Mike miller contributed in the playoffs?
    Whenz the last time Mike miller played PG?
    At least mason was shooting pretty during the Reg season.

  24. #49
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    6,599
    so the spurs will replace one 3pt shooting small forward who is mediocre at defense with another 3pt shooting small forward with mediocre defense? and pay him $6 million more? and force ginobili to guard melo, bryant, james, pierce, and roy?

    spurs need to refortify their defense and that begins with a solid perimeter defender.

  25. #50
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    choker in the playoffs.

    Not interested.
    because everyone else is clutch in the playoffs right?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •