Wow, a bunker where it makes the most logical sense.
Next you'll be telling me there's one under the White House.
Wow, a bunker where it makes the most logical sense.
Next you'll be telling me there's one under the White House.
Well, at least we'll know where Biden is when he's at an undisclosed location. I'm not sure Cheney is affected by this disclosure anymore.
I'm sure there is more than one location in the United States that can be undisclosed.
Dude, what are you talking about? Why would our government have more than one undisclosed location?![]()
If they aren't disclosed, then they aren't secure, which is absurd since with a $3 trillion budget or whatever it is now you'd think a location could be established which could survive a direct nuclear strike.
In any event, if the executive branch brings on an attack, I'd prefer they'd be sitting out in the open like the rest of us suckers.
If your opponent reveals his next move, you're not obliged to play into it.
So America's enemies are not obliged to nuke the Naval Observatory.
Again, you misunderstand.
Gee, on 9/11 the enemy didn't know where the Pentagon and WTC were. I guess we're supposed to pretend they couldn't have figured out where the White House or Capitol Hill were either.
Again, you fail to make sense.
To you? That's not a surprise.
If the state brings an attack upon itself, I'd prefer the enemy know where those who operate the state are at that time.
But, I know, they hate us. So never mind while your family faces a mortal threat that those who operate the organization that brought on the attack are better protected than you, or that in theory, their job (as per that do ent that the last occupant of the White House regarded as a ' ing piece of paper') is to protect your family from attack. So much for the notion of a captain going down with the ship, the state's leadership gets to cut and run and hide out somewhere.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)