Reply With Quote
Scola had A bad game. Bonner and Scola's other replacements have nothing BUT bad games to offer.
after his great 7 seven non clutch game
Scola had A bad game. Bonner and Scola's other replacements have nothing BUT bad games to offer.
lol Ducks. Those numbers are still better than anything Bonner did the in the playoffs.after his great 7 seven non clutch game
Has Bonner ever scored as much as Scola did last night in any playoff game?
maybe the most ridiculous thing ever, Spurs fans celebrating a Lakers success in the PO, just because they can't stand that a certain player has some success.
the stupidity of this even tops the stupidity of trading away Scola's rights for nothing.
and as mentioned, Scola's "bad night" was still better than what all the Spurs bigs outside Tim showed this PO. (and btw. it was still much much better than Tim's bad night in Dallas).
just get over it, this is a very good player and a legit starter on a NBA team. who delivers at a bargain price. 14.4 PPG and 8.4 RPG from a player, who gets 3 million per. well THAT's a good deal!
Spurs will not recover from the Scola deal for years to come. Guys like that dont come around very often. And to trade him for NOTHING to a division rival is just the icing on the cake....but lets not beat a dead horse right? Makes me mad enough to spit everytime I see that dude in rocket red.
lol reading this stuff never gets old
The only way we'll get over the trade would be having V-Span being a championship contributor for us... not even Splitterwould heal the wound
only if the Spurs win the next championshipThe only way we'll get over the trade would be having V-Span being a championship contributor for us... not even Splitter
they win again
and the scolamania is over
guys like scola come around often it is not like he is david robinson
I don't think so... again they'll c him shine and still think he was given away for nothing... it'd require V-Span being a contributor for another ship... winning it sans something we got out of the trade won't stop it.. again... not even with Tiago
Last edited by urunobili; 05-18-2009 at 01:47 PM.
I AM SCOLLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA
maybe Whottt's right about him being a choker! j/k
But of course I'm right, his entire career is a testament to validity of that claim unless you want to use some bull rationale streeeeetch about Team Italy...give me a ing break. He's not done ...
He was exposed for the mediocre player he is, he was last or close to it on his team in +/- in some of the games in this series, his team got blown out by 40 ing points...even in the rebound win against the sleeping Lakers he didn't even get significant minutes in the closeout.
Never has so much been made over a role player ing scrub.
I hate to say it, but Scola fans were giving real Spurfans a reason to hate the Rockets more than the Lakers...I myself remained above that fray inspite of antagonism from the head Scola fans...but bottom line, Scola fans are just about worse than any segment of fans ever on ST in terms of pure stupidty and a complete lack of insight into the game...it's tough to be worse than bandwagon Lakerfan, but Scola fan is definitely giving them a challenge.
BTW, Scola's going to be 30 next season, in all likelyhood this was the pinnacle of his career.
What a sad ing joke this all has been.
I suggest Whott to listen to Jeff Van Gundy and Bill Simmons in Simmons pod cast last week.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espnradio/...ive?id=2864045
Podcast for 5/12...
But hey Whotts analysis > Van Gundy/ Simmons and every fan with logical sense
Van Gundy might possibly be more over-rated than Scola, so whatever makes you feel good. I can find plenty of bonafied dumbasses saying the same things.
I have never understood why people think numbers somehow equal greater intelligence, when just the opposite if anything, is provably true. And the media is almost always the stupidest voice of them all.
whottt, you should replace R.C. Buford.
depends on what "analysis" and when he made it.
some years ago he was the greatest Scola fan and claimed he would be a top 5 pick.
now Scola looked like a player, who should at least have been a lottery pick and now he calls him overrated. oh well.
(btw. remember who was a top 5 pick in the same draft in 2002? yes, Drew Gooden was picked at #4.)
Thinking about your 27500 messages?
Yes, but only once Buford has been hired by the Clippers.
I guess we all agree: Scola is the reason why Houston got eliminated by a short-handed Lakers team.
Unlike the Scola-less, Spanoulis-Oberto-powered Spurs last year, that blew out the Lakers in five games.
It's almost as if you think your obvious bandwaggoner status is a positive or something.
You almost seem to be proud of it.
But go ahead and go after post totals...it's probably one of your most worthwhile and insightul posts ever. It certainly beats anything you've ever posted about basketball.
Flush yourself, see if I notice.
I don't know what the biggest joke actually is...the Scola fans being closet RocketFans, or the continual stream of stupidty that Scola would in any way approximate his numbers under Adelman if he were to play for the Spurs and alongside Tim Duncan.
#1. It's a fact Rick Adelman is a better offensive coach than Pop. His teams score more points, therefore they put up bigger offensive numbers.
#2. It's also just about a near fact that any big that plays along side Duncan suffers a decline in numbers sooner or later.
#3. It is definitely a fact that Tim Duncan is a far superior rebounder to any big Scola has ever played alongside of, IOW, there is a finite number of gettable rebounds in any given game, and Duncan makes that number smaller, as does Pop's rebounding philosophy.
I wipe my ass with the bush league newbie "insight" of the Scola fans...not to mention their bandwagoning and team jumping creed and their completely ignorant and skewed view of what cons utes success, nay greatness, on the basketball court.
Pa
the
tic.
I won't be surprised if Scola gets traded...yeah they probably like his intensity, but I bet they like the prospects of what they could get for him and feel that would be more of a gain than what he brings in terms of championship viability, definitely longterm even if not shortterm. Won't surprise me at all to see him get traded. I mean it happened to Nocioni and he is a much more viable championship NBA player than Scola.
With Duncan on the downhill side of his career, Scola might do fine with the attention TD still attracts. Think DRob ceding the throne to TD. Now Scola is no TD, but he could have complemented him fine. Scola is like a much better version of Oberto, who was serviceable in his first year or two with us. I like Scola just fine at $3 million, but that opportunity is lost. Next up is a bigger contract for him, possibly even a bad one that we would not want to touch. I'd stil take him at the MLE for a few years, Manu + Scola would be worth seeing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
