Reply With Quote
No thanks..
Since Boozer is likely to opt out of his contract, I would seriously like to get him in a Spurs uniform. Not sure if there is anyway we can work something on with regard to the contracts situation.
Maybe TD and Manu can restructure their deals to get Boozer on board.
Oberto's salary is not guranteed for next season. Drop him.
Vaughn and Udoka can leave.
I'd rather have Boozer than Gooden unless Gooden comes cheap and wouldnt mind being a backup.
So we pay luxury tax or do some trades later on to get under the luxury tax situation just for this upcoming year. Then in 2010/11 our situation becomes a whole lot better and we still have Duncan, Parker, Boozer, Manu and surround them with cheap role players.
Boozer and Duncan becomes 2nd coming of twin towers. Scoring load on Duncan reduces greatly and Boozer can be focal point of low post game. Duncan focuses more on defense and occassionally can carry the load.
We improve our rebounding and low post defense in anticipation of the Lakers, Houston etc...
Boozer comes from Utah's pick and roll school so he and Parker can reek havoc. TD moves to center and stays there to extend his shelf life.
But Peter Holt aint never gonna buy into this even if Boozer is willing to come over.
No thanks..
Rather have Milsap... for a lower price tag.
And Boozer plays defense??
no... sleazy .
Duncan and Boozer played together before. It didn't work out well at all.
Rather have Milsap as well....he plays harder and doesn't stop playing to yell and look at the refs when he doesn't get a call.
Theres no way possible that we get Milsap though I too would prefer him. Much younger as well.
There's actually no way possible to get Boozer either. Even if the Spurs wanted him and were willing to exceed the tax, they are limited to a max offer of the MLE. That's less than half the salary that Boozer would be opting out of. The only way the way the Spurs could obtain Boozer within the rules would be in a sign and trade. That would make no sense for the Jazz because the salary they would take back would seriously hinder their efforts to keep Milsap.
simply cant happen. manu and timmy cant restructure their deals. couldnt even if they wanted to (its not allowed). dropping oberto, vaughn, and udoka would mean nothing toward adding boozer (still far over the cap). there is just no possible way for us to acquire boozer via free agency.
only way even to make this a possibility is in a s&t, but then the only thing of value we really have (with a significant enough cap figure) is manu.
I THINK YOU ARE BOOZING..... Peace.
Boozer doesn't impress me that much. Unfortunately my standard for a Big Man is TimmyDuncan.
Mr. Plow is a loser
And I think he is a boozer...
For some reason, that song always comes to mind, every time I hear Boozer's name.
boozer=gooden
milsap please
The guy screwed over a blind man...too much bad karma...
As someone who has seen Boozer play a lot in the last couple of years, as well as observed his actions concerning his team and off the court, I can assure you that Boozer is not nearly worth whatever large amount of money he ends up getting. The Spurs will not get him, and that's a good thing.
Milsap is vastly overrated, ive never seen him do much
Do people even attempt thinking before coming up with players we should acquire?
No wayyyy!
[thread]
[/thread]
We can't "Break the Bank" for this because banks always require that the collateral is worth somewhere around 95-120% of the value of the loan. The collateral you are proposing is worth only around 45%.
Next.
1.) In no way is Boozer a tower.
2.) He's proved to be weak and over paid.
3.) I'm not a fan of under sized PF's.
4.) He's all about the money he isn't worth.
5.) Cost too much anyways.
6.) Untrustworthy
How about let's don't and say we didn't?
I would rather get Millsap or even Brewer
Boozer is too soft. People are noticing that about the Lakers, well Boozer is in the same category. The Spurs need someone who will bring interior toughness to the team, not to be some kind of cupcake.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
