Colin Powell straight talks

[Ignignokt]

One would think that they would be giving the policy speeches that you pimp in this forum.

Instead, it's Cheney.

Your leader.

No, one (whose an honest one) would think that Cheney is defending his policies he implemented, and has a right to do so. And i agree with his policies.

Cheney does not formulate new strategy or raise money, or even prop candidates for elections, that's steele.

the GOP has many voices, and just because the WH doesn't like a pariticular voice doesn't mean its cheap political tactics to make an issue about one particular person or their popularity ratings being a sole voice of the party.

Fact is, Obama for better or for worse has decided to fire back at Cheney and stoop to his level by even making a speech during his, if this is a piece of a cake why the defensiveness.

Why do you discard whatever personal credibility you had left in yourself and become an Obama Lapdog by repeating such red herring.

You're not that stupid as you strive to be right?

So fact is Cheney who has ty ratings from the getgo is derailing Obama's message.

Cheney is just a voice.

and he's your owner.

[gtownspur]

No, anyone (who's an honest one) would think that Cheney is defending his policies he implemented, and has a right to do so. And i agree with his policies.

Cheney does not formulate new strategy or raise money, or even prop candidates for elections, that's steele.

the GOP has many voices, and just because the WH doesn't like a pariticular voice doesn't mean its cheap political tactics to make an issue about one particular person or their popularity ratings being a sole voice of the party is sound truth.

Fact is, Obama for better or for worse has decided to fire back at Cheney and stoop to his level by even making a speech during his, if this is a piece of a cake why the defensiveness.

Why do you discard whatever personal credibility you had left in yourself and become an Obama Lapdog by repeating such red herring.

You're not that stupid as you strive to be right?

So fact is Cheney who has ty ratings from the getgo is derailing Obama's message.

Cheney is just a voice.

and he's your owner.

can't edit on my ignignokt moniker.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Sounds like has a guilty conscience..oh wait doesn't have a conscience..never mind

[ChumpDumper]

No, one (whose an honest one) would think that Cheney is defending his policies he implemented, and has a right to do so. And i agree with his policies.

So what specifically is Obama doing differently that you disagree with?

Cheney does not formulate new strategy or raise money, or even prop candidates for elections, that's steele.

I bet he does raise money. It's not a good idea for him to pimp candidates at this time.

the GOP has many voices, and just because the WH doesn't like a pariticular voice doesn't mean its cheap political tactics to make an issue about one particular person or their popularity ratings being a sole voice of the party.

Not the sole voice. The main voice for now. The de facto leader.

Fact is, Obama for better or for worse has decided to fire back at Cheney and stoop to his level by even making a speech during his, if this is a piece of a cake why the defensiveness.

Why is Cheney being so defensive?

Why do you discard whatever personal credibility you had left in yourself and become an Obama Lapdog by repeating such red herring.

I don't see any other leaders leading.

You're not that stupid as you strive to be right?

I'm right in that there really hasn't been any effect from all of this.

So fact is Cheney who has ty ratings from the getgo is derailing Obama's message.

I want to know what the huge difference is here that's gotten you cheering so much.

[hope4dopes]

Powell kicked Cheney and Limpballs ass over the weekend. I've always said I'd vote for Powell.

that's not saying much you were stupid enough to vote for Obama.

[Ignignokt]

Why is Cheney being so defensive?

Cuz it would be appropriate to be defend arguments that pertain to one's policy.

The Gitmo policy for one, is very important to the ex vp and a policy which i agree on along with enhanced interrogation when needed.

But i guess agreeing with somebody is cheering.

[Marcus Bryant]

He's a RINO...

A republican stands for the republic. Not national policy. The idea of the republic is states rights!

Ah yes, any Republican who doesn't toe the neo-progressive militarist welfare state line is a "RINO." Don't worry, soon enough the GOP will be purged of all but the most ardent 1% of you, so that you can bask in your version of "conservative" purity while losing every election in the foreseeable future.

[ChumpDumper]

Cuz it would be appropriate to be defend arguments that pertain to one's policy.

The Gitmo policy for one, is very important to the ex vp and a policy which i agree on along with enhanced interrogation when needed.

But i guess agreeing with somebody is cheering.

What is done at Gitmo that can't be done elsewhere?

And the enhanced interrogation hasn't been done for six years. It must not have been all that effective if they just gave it up.

[Ignignokt]

Ah yes, any Republican who doesn't toe the neo-progressive militarist welfare state line is a "RINO." Don't worry, soon enough the GOP will be purged of all but the most ardent 1% of you, so that you can bask in your version of "conservative" purity while losing every election in the foreseeable future.

You're an idiot once again. Did you cut and paste from your previous posts? Your response does not make any sense to Wild Cobra's states rights response. I never knew states rights was a big Neo con dream? I thought they were big centralization federal govt addicts.

Please, do yourself a favor and become relevant again... wait, i mean for once.

[Wild Cobra]

Ah yes, any Republican who doesn't toe the neo-progressive militarist welfare state line is a "RINO."

I doubt you really think that's what I meant.

Don't worry, soon enough the GOP will be purged of all but the most ardent 1% of you, so that you can bask in your version of "conservative" purity while losing every election in the foreseeable future.

Then they will never have a majority again.

[hope4dopes]

Ah yes, any Republican who doesn't toe the neo-progressive militarist welfare state line is a "RINO." Don't worry, soon enough the GOP will be purged of all but the most ardent 1% of you, so that you can bask in your version of "conservative" purity while losing every election in the foreseeable future.

Or they could keep pimping there ass out, to the American Idol voting block and get elected? Great strategy.

[Gino]

I just think its humorous that Obama is trying to take credit for ending interrogation practices the Bush Administration ended 6 years ago.

Whats next? Obama's "No Child Left Behind" Act?

[George Gervin's Afro]

I just think its humorous that Obama is trying to take credit for ending interrogation practices the Bush Administration ended 6 years ago.

Whats next? Obama's "No Child Left Behind" Act?

Give him time because it took Bush 8 yrs to create the mess.