Great... but, AFAIK, that situation would never happen. Thanks for being against a situation that would never happen.
You are weird. "Thanks" you sound like a ing loser. Didn't mommy tell you never to say never. And dumbass, OJ was not let go on a technicality. You can try to spin that bull all you want in that little ing head of yours but you are dead wrong. Have some humility and just shut the up. You want to be Johnny Law and have no morals to do what is right , thats ur deal but don't act like a because I would do what is right thing.
what's the right thing that you would do, Jack?
Well Clam, I am glad u asked that. My sister is coming down to visit me and my family. Her 9 year old son wants to play soccer in the fall but he is thinking he will not be good enough to play because it's been 2 years since he has been on a team. This summer I put him in this soccer summer camp for 2 weeks and I put together a indoor team he can play on as well. I will coach him and work with him to try to get him up to par with the other kids back in Virginia when fall rolls around.
don't forget the messy monkey clean monkey routine.
thats my favorite.
Never say bad monkey or good monkey
But to answer ur question ..... If the decision was up to me I would not let a child molestor walk because he was not read his miranda rights. That simple. Not talking about laws or if there was even a small chance he was innocent. Some say let the guy walk period. I disagree.
Who's saying that? I'm saying that certain evidence would not be permissible due to technicalities. I've said 10 times over that OTHER evidence would still be permissible.
But to answer ur question ..... If the decision was up to me I would not let a child molestor walk because he was not read his miranda rights. That simple. Not talking about laws or if there was even a small chance he was innocent. Some say let the guy walk period. I disagree.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote