Reply With Quote
I was consulting for Missile Defense Agency at the Navy Annex at the end of September.
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...,0.036049&z=16
I was told that the Navy Annex had antenna knocked over by the plane. So I guess that was part of the lying.
There is no "debunking" possible.
The plane at the pentagon did not fly in the path stated by the government.
The driver of the taxi that which the light pole fell over on admitted that the scene was planned out
"he was just a part of it"
The location of the light poles is south of a citgo while eyewitness all claim the plane flew north of the gas station.
There is no arguing these stone cold facts.. the writing is on the wall.
Dont believe me that LLoyde England spilt the beans about the the scene being staged watch for yourself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GHM5...om=PL&index=21
see the entire video at pentacon.com
Last edited by The_Worlds_finest; 06-01-2009 at 09:32 PM.
I was consulting for Missile Defense Agency at the Navy Annex at the end of September.
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...,0.036049&z=16
I was told that the Navy Annex had antenna knocked over by the plane. So I guess that was part of the lying.
The light poles are south east of the annex and are southwest in direction....please tell me how they were knocked over AND an antenna......oh wait if you watched the video of the CAB DRIVER IN THE VIDEO AT THE LIGHT POLE LOCATION SAYING " IT WAS PLANNED" you would know....
So, what, exactly, are you alleging?
There is no alleging about it. The eyewitnesses said they saw the plane north of the citgo station. The guy in the photo with the taxi says the scene was planned out. Its all on the table, you need to draw your own conclusions.
If he's saying he was paid to have a story then, why not believe he's being paid to lie now?
That path doesn't wash anyway. Remember where the nose of the jet was found?
As for the lamp posts. The wings are pretty long, and a slight yaw deviation could explain them.
Not evidence enough. I say BS....
Besides. Why lie about it? You twoofers cannot deny the types of planes that hit, now you're still trying to say they lied somehow?
What purpose?
So now this vast conspiracy also includes a senile old cab driver as well?
Sorry, but it doesn't even pass the smell test. The kooks are really scrapin' the bottom of the barrel at this point. The old man didn't even admit to anything. The kooks just listened to his off-camera ramblings and heard what they wanted to hear.
hyeah doggIf he's saying he was paid to have a story then, why not believe he's being paid to lie now?
look watch the video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...95694237574426
LEGIT Pentagon Cops and a store employee BOTH say and SAW the plane fly north of the citgo.
The official story and the orintation of the knocked over light poles and MOST IMPORTANTLY direction of the impact shows a northeast direction.
and also if you watched the video I posted you would know that Lloyde England didnt know he was being recorded when he confessed.
Even the memorial is in the claimed direction
So whos lieing now eye witnesses or the media and government.....
Planned out? How? What was planned out?
I guess I still don't get it. Why lie about the path of the airplane that -- even you now admit -- everyone saw?look watch the video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...95694237574426
LEGIT Pentagon Cops and a store employee BOTH say and SAW the plane fly north of the citgo.
The official story and the orintation of the knocked over light poles and MOST IMPORTANTLY direction of the impact shows a northeast direction.
and also if you watched the video I posted you would know that Lloyde England didnt know he was being recorded when he confessed.
Even the memorial is in the claimed direction
So whos lieing now eye witnesses or the media and government.....
It hit the ing building. What are you alleging is being covered up with this "plan" involving the geezer cabbie?
I wish i could tell you why the government and media are lying about the path of the plane however I cant. But what can be shown and explained is that A staged scene took place that couldnt have been possible from eyewitness acounts saying the plane was north of the citgo.
Well -- and we're merely stipulating you're right -- without the why, it's either a mistake or a meaningless "plot."
There is some meaning behind it but we will never know, but what we can gather is that the true plane did infact come in from the north and what ever hit the pentagon came in from the south.
Look at that taxi, there is no damage besides the windshield.
The plane was suppose to be going 500 mph and the force from hitting the pole and then onto the car only enough to bust the windshield?
Why did they take the pole off the car? Certainly wasnt to leave or else he wouldnt have stood around for the photo op.
a plane full of people, flown by terrorists, hit the ing pentagon. What are you arguing?
ChumpDumper looks to switch screen names to be safe!
Dear troll that started this thread,
KILL YOURSELF.
You know Yonivore I used to look up to you, I sometimes envy you. I would tell my friends at work how your the king of cut and paste and how your up to date with all that is political. Then after uncle tom got elected you seem to go from ...................
to.............
and now you still show your true ignorance by defending your Daddy Bush even though you know no jet hit the Pentagon is depressing to read.
your a bigger than me!
No jet hit the pentagon.........hahahaha
oh here we go cursing eh? way to get your point across.
You dufus watch the video. Im not making anything up Im just going off the provided facts....people saw plane flying in a total different path than the light poles government and media are saying.....hmmm
Anyone remember when the truthers were trying to tell us that the maintenance work truck path in the ground was a line of attack laid out for the plane to follow?
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 06-02-2009 at 08:18 PM.
Here's something else. How do the twoofers believe the altered path caused this damage?
Now consider the beam damage:
How does that path cause the damage depicted?
Ferris...
Your missing the point. Obviously something hit the pentagon coming from the SOUTH east.....so explain the 2 pentagon cops and the citgo employee stating that they are 100% sure the plane was in a north east direction....does something not add up???
NWO Movement
For me, the physical evidence is more conclusive than peoples word...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
