Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    http://cfn.scout.com/2/870002.html

    ...i'm surprised it wasn't A&M across the board.

  2. #2
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    Post Count
    22,149
    I saw that too. I would put A&M at #3. Notre Dame is truly #1 though.

  3. #3
    Ina world of hype, we win IronMexican's Avatar
    My Team
    USC Trojans
    Post Count
    24,612
    Top 2 are definitely right.

  4. #4
    Veteran Thompson's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas A&M Aggies
    Post Count
    2,481
    I've often wondered if I somehow came into a massive amount of money (say, a few hundred million to a billion or so), what could be done to put A&M into the perennial 4-5 top teams nationally?

    What do we lack that other top schools have that would draw more talented players -things we could buy or build, that is. Part of it is winning in and of itself. Winning creates a snowball effect in which the school that does well draws better talent, and continues winning. Losing is a vicious cycle because you can't get those players to come anymore, and lose more as a consequence. Assuming you had a few hundred million to blow and you wanted to send A&M to the top, what could you do (legally, of course)?

  5. #5
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    I've often wondered if I somehow came into a massive amount of money (say, a few hundred million to a billion or so), what could be done to put A&M into the perennial 4-5 top teams nationally?

    What do we lack that other top schools have that would draw more talented players -things we could buy or build, that is. Part of it is winning in and of itself. Winning creates a snowball effect in which the school that does well draws better talent, and continues winning. Losing is a vicious cycle because you can't get those players to come anymore, and lose more as a consequence. Assuming you had a few hundred million to blow and you wanted to send A&M to the top, what could you do (legally, of course)?
    recruiting has been solid enough year in and year out for the aggies, so that's not really the problem.

    The problem has been the coaching since Slo left. Fran obviously sucked and Sherman aint the answer. They got burned so bad with Fran that they appear to be scared to think outside the box and played it way too conservatively with that hiring.

    Personally, I think they missed out by not getting Art Briles. That guy may have Baylor in a bowl game sooner than A&M.

  6. #6
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    Post Count
    22,149
    recruiting has been solid enough year in and year out for the aggies, so that's not really the problem.
    Their recruiting is weak. Please. And even when they get one or two "great" talents even they become busts or are not effective enough to carry the team.

  7. #7
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    Their recruiting is weak. Please. And even when they get one or two "great" talents even they become busts or are not effective enough to carry the team.
    weak compared to who?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •