Reply With Quote
My attacks. I want you to react to my attacks on It the same way you did to Letterman's attacks on Palin.
No.Wouldn't it be better just to get on with your tale?
I'm asked to overlook or excuse what, please?
Wouldn't it be better just to get on with your tale?
My attacks. I want you to react to my attacks on It the same way you did to Letterman's attacks on Palin.
No.Wouldn't it be better just to get on with your tale?
Those are usually the last words uttered before logging onto www.mailorderbrides.comShe couldn't be a if she wanted too...on top of that, she strikes me as a domineering .
You OTOH...are a complete and total and couldn't be anything less even if you wanted too. As evidenced in this thread...
And a stupid one at that.
Your opinion is because of your double standard. Total .
Total
Worthless.
Why don't you just get Democrat tatooed across your ing face. It's the label that means everything to you.
^lol
whottt championing Sarah Palin blows away anything ever posted in any of the "Megan Fox overated" threads.
Only in my dreams. Plus Todd could probably kick my ass.
That is all there is to you and your politics. You're just that simple.
That doesn't even qualify as politics.
Why am I not surprised that you see it that way?
Easier to keep the delusion alive that way I suppose.
Tough luck. I get to have my own reaction to you. You have no say on that.
I did not really notice your attacks on Palin so much. Why should I put you next to David Letterman, distinctive as you are?
Is this a bid to keep the phony baloney outrage alive? I don't get it. Why should I have to satisfy you, Whottt?
Hey, it's your bag of re ed sexist , not mine.
you just don't get it.
Oh sure I do.
Which is the fairly correct response seeing as how I didn't attack Palin.I did not really notice your attacks on Palin so much.
He's much more distinctive than I am. Furthermore, his opinion is known by more people, and more importantly, the target is much more likely to learn of his opinion, than my target is of mine.Why should I put you next to David Letterman, distinctive as you are?
You don't...Is this a bid to keep the phony baloney outrage alive? I don't get it. Why should I have to satisfy you, Whottt?
Ah yes, I forgot. You maligned the attractiveness of the First Lady. I ignored that too.
Your point?
Last edited by Winehole23; 06-10-2009 at 01:58 AM.
Does he really not see what he did?
(using the neuter pronoun to describe a person threw me off. I didn't see the capitalization at first)
I want you to react to my attacks on It the same way you did to Letterman's attacks on Palin.
Meanwhile, as the endless attacks and slander from the left hit Governor Palin, she has been found innocent of all the ethics complaints against her!
I guess making fun of her drowns that out in the news.
I understand. Make the truth go away by attacking.
ing lib s. You guys are a disgrace.
Obama makes fun of his own ears and I'll admit that Mic e Obama may not be gorgeous but I don't she is grotesque.
I also don't think Sarah is all that. She is attractive but not gorgeous.
Whottt has wet dreams about Sarah though.
ing conserv s. You guys and gals are disgusting.
Palin is going nowhere and she sure as won't be on the ticket in 2012...not if republicans want any chance of winning.
Why would libs care about a loser?
I like how these threads all end up the same.
"<party that I follow like a sheep> is always being attacked by <pet name for hated other party members>. <party that I hate> always throws attacks against <my holy party that would never say anything bad>."
Do people really think the party line is split on intelligence or humanity or ethics or anything? Newsflash: neo-cons and libs are both evil, lying, slanderous, humorless sheep. You do, in fact, belong to a party that is just as crappy as the one you hate.
In conclusion, watch more southpark.
Well no Sherlock.
letterman is still bitter over the mccain snub and is even more bitter 'cause conan is kicking his ass. nothing to see here. move along and continue to talk about someone that "doesn't matter".
letterman is still on?
exactly
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
