Reply With Quote
Did you seriously not read the statement in the "(xxxxxx)" ?
The morality of -sexuality should be left to the individual, just like the morality of every decision that doesn't harm others. People should be free to make their own decision, and if religious organizations feel that -sexuality is wrong (which I agree with on a moral basis) then they should teach as much. The government should stay the out of individuals homes and personal lives. Expand individual liberties, not retract.
Did you seriously not read the statement in the "(xxxxxx)" ?
Gay marriage will end the world. Book it!
Honestly, I was just trying to provoke you guys to see what you would say.I had a good laugh out of this. I don't care much about Gay marriages, as long as they stay away from me and my family Im fine.
The gay's are coming to get you. Beware. *spooky ghost sounds*
Blacks and Hispanics owned slaves.
Fact.
watch out for the s in NAMBLA
I'd totally own a slave.
Pretty much every society in the history of the world has owned slaves at one point or another. I really don't think (unless I'm missing it) that anybody is arguing for reparations.
Somebody is arguing for them or else the idea wouldn't be before Congress.
Personally, I can't understand why there's no outrage for the slavery that is still practiced today, primarily in Africa, the ME, and South Asia.
And I do feel kind of blameless on this..as far as I know, no one in my family ever owned slaves.
you know this thread is liek 3 months old?
eh... there's always going to be some re ed people in congress given how big it is. Seeing as it only has 5 co-sponsors and hasn't gone anywhere in months, I'm assuming it's dead.
Probably just a guy pandering to his cons uents in a largely black district.
Just who do they plan on subpoenaing ? Former slaves ? Former slave owners ?
Lincoln ?
Of course, but you do realize I wasn't the one bumped it?
No one had made the points I made.
It's debatable that it's "for the most part how you were born".
Blacks and Hispanics never legally owned White slaves in America.
Fact.
You're an idiot.
Fact.
I reject the premise that it's debatable. I feel, through personal experiences and things that I've witnessed, that the vast majority of gays/lesbians are born into it and display signs that they are from a very, very early age.
I reject it from personal experience. If I hadn't seen what I've seen then I'd probably agree with you.
Me pointing out the failure of your argument makes you angry.
Fact.
Until there is definitive proof of some kind of gene that programs some of our behavior, it'll be debatable.
My thoughts on some of people I've seen suggest to me choice through environmental factors that influence their decision making.
I've seen those doing it for environmental factors and for attention too... but not nearly as much as I've seen people who were obviously gay from the word go.
I mean is it really such a weird thing to believe that 2-3% of the population is born with an attraction to the same sex?
believing it and proving it are two different things.
and no, I don't believe it.
IMO, attraction is something that comes through time and experience and is not as limited to gay/straight black/white blonde/redhread as people tend to make it.
#1. Blacks, hispanics AND Native Americans most certainly did own white slaves in America, legally, you incomparably ignorant .
#2. Even if they didn't, your point is stupid, aimless and meaningless to the topic at hand unless you are a racist intent on ignoring the fact that whites were slaves in America LEGALLY, and that Blacks, Hispanics and Native Americans all owned slaves, legally. Fact.
#3. In case you are too stupid to understand this, whites were also slaves in America. Legally. Fact.
#4. Your comment was a stupid needless comment, incomparably stupid. Much like you are a stupid needless poster, incomparably stupid.
And I know I'm not the only one that thinks this.
Fact.
You are stupid, I would particularly appreciate it if you would:
A, Educate yourself on the history of slavery in America before you presume to make statements as fact that are in fact, not factual at all.
B. Realize that I am not in fact angry at you because your statement in any way refuted my statement, for it did not, and was not an accurate statement. On the contrary, I am mad because you know less than I do and think you know more...
It's your stupidity based arrogance that angers me....and this hardly makes you unique. The biggest problemn with stupid people, is the way they fail to realize they are stupid.
Fact.
C. Never post to me again.
No historical support is linked by either side. Just saying.
Was this dispute resolved elsewhere on ST?
Why don't you research it and let us know what you find?
I don't really care about it that much.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
