Reply With Quote
Mack Brown.
lol, I voted for Pete 'cause he's a playa
Who is the better Coach/recruit?
Mack Brown.
lol, I voted for Pete 'cause he's a playa
Larry Coker
Brent Vulnerables
Tim Tebow. As depicted on the ceilling of the Sistine Chapel.
While I'm a fan of Pete Carroll's recruiting style and philosophy when it comes to playing time, you cannot deny the strength of what Urban Meyer is doing down in Gainesville. He has done a remarkable job on getting tons of great out-of-state recruits to bolster the talent-rich high schools of Florida he already commands over in-state rivals such as Florida State and the U. Can't really go wrong with either coach's ability to recruit and field compe ive le contenders...
you can have him
Nick Satan
theyre both overrated id have to say URRRRRRRRRban because hes lost fewer games to underdogs
and hes more Urban
Carroll for recruiting and Meyer for coaching.
Carroll
Carroll by far. Man USC is going to be sick this year.
Carrol seems to lose games to bad opponents every year, and will be on probabtion for the reggie bush incident, while Meyer seems to run a clean program.
Without Sanchez, I don't see it.
Pretty much agree with this. Meyer has been successful at two other smaller schools without the big name of Florida to help him recruit. He did great at Bowling Green and Utah.
Carroll gets the best recruits year in and year out. While he does a great job with that, there's little evidence that he could do it at another school where recruiting and coaching would be much more challenging. USC and its tradition helps recruit itself.
That said, I don't think anyone can argue that both are great recruiters and great coaches, obviously. I just give a little more credit to Urban Meyer for being able to do it at smaller schools that don't recruit themselves.
roflroflrofl
It's great, because, you guys get 5 stars year in and year out, yet only have 1 championship to show for it. And that was against ing oklahoma.
you guys are one regular season loss against a suck ass pac-10 team from being near Ohio State status.
And how has Texas been more successful than USC? They got 1 BCS le this decade, too. A lot less BCS wins, too.
Texas' chode bloading of USC is more epic than anything that's happened this decade.
easy to get into BCS games when you play in the pac-10 and are named "USC"
Yeah, Texas really showed the world what they were about when they smashed OSU.
Yeah plus Texas didn't have to go through a conference gauntlet of playing big time ESPN/USA Today Top 75 teams like Washington State & Stanford & Oregon State (whoops!)
Damn right. They had to play teams like Oklahoma, Texas Tech and Okie State. All those teams showed what they were really about in Bowl season. As much as I hate the SEC, they are clearly the best conference, far and away. Every year, the media tries to hype up all non SEC schools. 2007 it was the Pac 10, and 2008 it was the Big 12.
LOL bowl season is like an extended, glorified NBA All-Star Weekend. Most of the big schools who had NC hopes don't give a any more. USC wins because their bowl game is a home game every year.
How do I get a college team under my name?
edit: well i found out, but no UC Davis Aggies.
i dont think anyone said that
I guess 2 is a lot less
everyone knows USC is a powerhouse and the computers love usc
we'll hear it again all year long
the computers love USC
I DONT KNOW WHAT IT IS BUT the "computers" love USC
but its kind of easy to make the rosebowl when you dont play a conference championship and the second best team is oregon
and you pay your best players and put their families in their own new house all bills paid and give them bull jobs
and your twins in the secondary have a dad who invented modern day steroids and tested them on his sons
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
