the whole "decade" thing is totally arbitrary.
The Spurs won 4 les in 9 years.
The Lakers won 4 les in 10 years.
I'd rather have 4 in 9 than 4 in 10.
I wonder if the lakers played in sa and the spurs played in la
who would have more rings
the whole "decade" thing is totally arbitrary.
The Spurs won 4 les in 9 years.
The Lakers won 4 les in 10 years.
I'd rather have 4 in 9 than 4 in 10.
I'll give the Spurs '99 and call it a tie at four les each.
Lakers are still the Team Of the Decade because the Team Of The Decade is not allowed to get bounced by the Mavericks twice.
Sorry--that's just the way it is.
Exactly, the Rockets finished a decade-long mission in making the second round this season. their 22 winning streak also deserves some credit though.
You want to talk about rationalizing? How about you rationalizing about your lakers being "team of the decade". The San Antonio Spurs are the most winningest team in ALL of professional sports for well over a decade. There is NOTHING wrong with being a San Antonio Spurs fan. We have class and pride on our side. Our team plays the game the way it is supposed to be played. I would rather have quality over quan y in this case. We have 4 shiny, gleaming trophies compared to your team's last few trophies which are all tarnished and stained with the way you lakers fans act afterwards. Keep gloating. It does not add up to much.
Lakers got snubbed by the postseason in 04-05...
We are going to take a on the Lakers 15 trophies next season.
RAGGGEEEEE.
It amounts to 15 rings . Your excuse making on the other hand is what doesn't amount to anything. You lose.
You still around?
Jesus already, what do you want? a F*cking medal?! Get over it...
and more Finals losses, as well as a season where they didn't even reach the playoffs. The Spurs also have the best record of any team in any sport over the past decade...Spurs are team of the decade..doesn't matter...
Mavs fans, tlong, and Suns fans should all be automatically banned when their seasons end.
In that case no team that misses the playoffs and blows a 3-1 lead can be team of the decade either. I wonder how many 4th quarters of game 7 Duncan decided not to shoot in.
LMAO..you are a MASTER idiot. But it's ok for the team of the decade to miss the playoffs entirely for a season in that decade? And it's ok to lose when being ahead 3-1 in a playoff series in that decade? I still call us the Team of the decade without '99...but with '99, we completely own you. We have the best record of any team in any sport over the past decade, and reached the playoffs every season in the decade, where you can't say the same.
Who knows.
One thing is certain, SA people would still about the reffing.
My point exactly..we must have posted this at the same time..lol..I'm right under you.
Lakers are not team of the decade.
Win one more next year and they have a good case, not before.
4 NBA les. 6 Finals appearances.
vs.
3 NBA les. 3 Finals appearances. And 2 losses to the Dallas Mavericks.
/thread
I'm sure Duncan kisses his 4 before he go plays World of warcraft till 3 in the morning.
letting a team come back after being ahead 3-1....not even making the playoffs in one of the seasons during that decade
vs.
The best record of all teams in all sports during that decade...undefeated in the Finals...
Yep..you're still an idiot, House.
He has 3 in the 00's, Lakers have 4.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)