Reply With Quote
Mutilating animals is usually the first step..
Talk about a completely inept analogy.
What do you think the chances are of a dog attempting to assassinate the president? And even saying that, it is doubtful a stray dog or ANY large dog could approach the president without SS members right there in case something happens. A trained attacker could kill the president if he got within arms reach of him in seconds. My goodness man, THINK before you make such silly comparisons!
It's expressly against the law to hurt animals. He probably won't get life, but I PROMISE you that if he tortured and maimed PEOPLE before killing them, life would be the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM sentence he could hope for. If he is indeed convicted of this, the judge will hand out a sentence that goes in accordance with the severity of the crime. He individually tortured over a dozen animals. What kind of person do you really think he is?
Mutilating animals is usually the first step..
Not a person that is doing something for society. He's unemployed and stays home all day.
He deserves whatever punishment he gets, and then some.Weinman, who works odd jobs but spends most of his time at home and unemployed
He could face a maximum of 158 years in state prison if convicted on all counts, said Terry Shavez, spokeswoman for the state attorney's office.
Please let this happen.
He killed a bunch of cats.
Are you going to answer the question of what you feel is apt punishment, or dodge it and post more random youtube videos?
Apt punishment would be a fine and probation.
Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd you're an idiot.
The law could not disagree with you more thoroughly in this instance. Even killing and torturing a single animal is grounds for imprisonment, and for a very good reason.
the kid is 18, unemployed? lol, give him a break.
So he sits at home being a lazy ass all day. He doesn't deserve a break. Then, he gets his pleasure from torturing and killing cats. Again, he doesn't deserve a break.
You're a dumbass. You asked me what I thought apt punishment was, not what the courts say.
MIAMI — A judge in Miami has released a teenager accused of more than a dozen cat killings from jail.
Tyler Hayes Weinman had already posted bond before Wednesday's hearing, but the judge would not release him until the 18-year-old's psychiatric evaluation could be reviewed.
Judge John Thornton released Weinman after a brief hearing, saying the teen was "competent" to be released under electronic monitoring. Thornton said Weinman would be allowed to attend the counseling recommended by a doctor.
Weinman's father and stepmother left the courtroom without comment.
Weinman is accused of a string of cat mutilation killings that terrorized two suburban Miami communities for about a month.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,526864,00.html
And there have been several statements in this thread expressing exactly WHY he should go to jail, which are mostly the reason for the law being in place.
Hearing the opinions of those more well-versed in the subject than you offering sound rationale on a topic and then maintaining your own uneducated opinion without explaining why or how you feel this way?
Sorry. That's moronic. You can't even debate the issue because your basic defense is, "It was just a bunch of cats." It's hilarious that you know you cannot maintain any sort of reasonable argument (because there is absolutely no support for your opinion) yet you're doggedly sticking to a completely biased opinion with no basis in reality. You can have an opinion and it is still a stupid one. If I ask you what's a fit punishment for someone who beat their wife until she was in the hospital, and you say, "a slap on the wrist", the fact that it's your own belief does not remove the lack of thought that accompanies said opinion.
Last edited by Cry Havoc; 06-17-2009 at 11:35 AM.
8 yrs ago a girl showed me pictures of her boyfriend and his friends ing a cat... the thought still makes me sick.. she was/still is a teacher
This guy better get more time than Vick.
this other guy got off scot free...
"she loved her cat more than me... so I stomped and kicked the cat to death"
hung jury
edit: not that kind of "hung" Panda...
its just a bunch of cats
people shouldve kept their animals at the house, then they couldve blasted on this dude
Guess what? You're still stupid.
Looks like he did break in some of the houses to steal the cats
I don't think killing a cat is the biggest deal in the world but it's just the thought behind it that gets me. Why would you get off to something like that? I mean, it just doesn't make sense it's pretty sick. I've seen a few do entaries about the mind of a serial killer and from what I've learned in psychology, this is usually the mark of a future serial killer.
"Judge John Thornton released Weinman after a brief hearing, saying the teen was "competent" to be released under electronic monitoring."
Seriously, the dumbass is "competent". The low life piece of will probably put cat food on his front porch so he can mutilate some more. Just another sign of how flawed the justice system is.
if he could do that ^
its another sign of the irresponsible pet owners and stray cat problem we have in this country i could walk outside right now and kill 3 in about 5 minutes
judge released him and said that he posed no danger to himself or others...
hopefully "others" will pose a danger to this wacko.
I doubt that the kid posed a threat to the community. He tortured and killed a bunch of cats. BFD.
Yep. And all the psychological research that's been conducted that points to this man being at extreme risk for hurting/torturing/killing a person is bunk.
Why is it bunk? Because YOU think so. Your opinion outweighs all the evidence, all the research, and all the links that have placed people who hurt animals and people who hurt people in proximal categories. That's how damned intelligent you are. Because your thoughts are powerful enough to override all of this and see you through with conviction.
Well played, sir.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions