Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26
  1. #1
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    I was having this debate with my Lakerfan of a "brother". Do you think the Lakers still would have won the le if Bynum did not play and why?

  2. #2
    Believe.
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Post Count
    230
    Of course.. Bynum is an overrated non factor..

  3. #3
    I'm The Future GOAT carrao45's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    1,099
    Yes, but had he been dominant like b4 he got injured, the Lakers would have went 16-1

  4. #4
    Ina world of hype, we win IronMexican's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    24,616
    Yes. But I don't know if Ariza had gone down.

  5. #5
    Believe.
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Post Count
    230
    There's nothing wrong with bynum he's %100 healthy, Bynum just not that good.

  6. #6
    I don't have limits sonic21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,090
    yes, Bynum basketball IQ is very low, he'll never be a major player.

  7. #7
    Believe.
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Post Count
    230
    Bynum is lucky. He have the luxury of playing on the laker. I watch the kid play, just to see what the hype's about. What I saw was dude alway get easy look, cause opposing team defense are more concern about kobe and the other laker big. The day kobe retire n hand the franchise to Bynum, those are gonna be sad days for laker fan..

  8. #8
    Believe. VivaPopovich's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    872
    Would LA have won the le this year without Bynum?
    Yes. But not without Trevor Ariza.

  9. #9
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    Ok, that is what I thought. He was trying to act like Bynum made the difference (more or less) because I was arguing that the Lakers were far more talented than the other teams and he was trying to refute that.

    He was saying that the Lakers were not "far and away" the most talented and they needed the threat of Bynum to win.

  10. #10
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    Yes. But not without Trevor Ariza.
    Ya, but that was never the argument, that was generally understood.

  11. #11
    Spurs Nation
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    512
    He was looking like a promising young center before he got injured. Alot of Lakers fans said he was the missing piece when they lost against the Celtics. Overall he was pretty disappointing this year and he played horribly in the playoffs. He still young and has good size but they totally overpaid the guy :

    "Per team policy, terms of the agreement were not released.
    However, the deal was expected to be a three-year extension in the neighborhood of $42 million, which works out to $14 million a year. The Lakers would reportedly have a have a fourth-year option on the deal for $16 million, bringing the total deal to $58 million.
    The money proposed is closer to what Bynum was asking than what the Lakers originally offered -- Bynum and agent David Lee wanted a max deal that would have been worth closer to $17 million per year, while the Lakers were allegedly offering closer to $10 million" http://www.nbclosangeles.com/sports/...ract_Deal.html

    lol, 14-17m for that, no thanks. I wonder if they resign Odom this off-season and for how much.

  12. #12
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    Well, I like Bynum. Right before he was injured, he was absolutely beasting. He has a much better offensive game than Dwight and he was pretty damn athletic as well. He has good length be he can be a bit over zealous on that end.

    I do not know how he will recover from the injuries, but if he can fully, he will be a very, very good center.

    The point was about this playoffs though.

  13. #13
    Rubber Dinghy Rapids Bro Muser's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    11,204


    Not to mention, Josh Powell is a better player than Bynum. The only thing Bynum does good is eat and foul... really hard.

    And hang out at the mansion.

  14. #14
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    101,216
    No no and no



    He helped a lot, because he kept Gasol out of foul trouble vs Orlando.



    And that's not sarcasm by the way

  15. #15
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    3,868
    Bynum is a non factor

  16. #16
    2010 champs
    My Team
    Oklahoma City Thunder
    Post Count
    50
    Thunder Dynasty > SpursDynasty

  17. #17
    bandwagon hater
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    8,385
    Cant wait for Allanon to come in here and talk about how Bynum is going to be an all star next season putting up 20 and 10 a night.
















































    just messin' with you Allanon

  18. #18
    Believe. #1 Timmys Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    117
    Bymums greatness is not powerful like Mr Duncan.

  19. #19
    Dirk Administers THE SHOCKER LEONARD's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    8,576
    Bynum is a non factor

    If the Lakers win the championship...

    I'll leave this forum for life.

    I am doing this to prove to everyone how much of a non-factor the Lakers are in the playoffs. They haven't accomplished anything. They just want to come out, shoot some hoops, and BS their way to everything. Not going to get it done in the Finals. Orlando will win the championship. There are no All-Stars other than Kobe on this Laker team. Not an intimidating lineup. Just a bunch of a jump shooters who score off Kobe double teams.
    Pussy...

  20. #20
    Laker Lover 2Cleva's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    1,842
    No, LA doesn't win without Bynum.

    He obviously wasn't 100% but him being there allowed Gasol to not play the 5 all game and LO not to play the 4 all game. They got wore down in the playoffs last year from the pounding. Also, his willingness to take hard fouls, even at the cost of PT, was a factor. Teams did think twice about attacking the basket when he was in. Not having an anchor is what caught them last year. There would have been a lot more perimeter players attacking the basket if Bynum wasn't there backing them up. Without Bynum - LA was forced to play a zone D that teams had figured out and started tearing it apart. Bynum as an anchor allowed more man-to-man principles.

    Getting caught up in stats instead of really understanding the game is why anyone would think Bynum was worthless to this team.

  21. #21
    Kidd-Gilchrist Damn Chieflion's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    10,797
    No. He was the one who matched up with Yao Ming in the first 3 games of the Rockets series and a decoy on the last 4 as he was so large and could score over Chuck Hayes and Carl Landry which gave open looks for Gasol.

  22. #22
    CDs Nuts. resistanze's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Post Count
    23,869
    Yes. Stop kidding yourselves. Without Bynum + a healthy Ariza, they're still better than the team that made the finals last year. Their road through the West was at least at easy as last year and 2X as easy in the finals. They would've won without Bynum.

  23. #23
    Kidd-Gilchrist Damn Chieflion's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    10,797
    Yes. Stop kidding yourselves. Without Bynum + a healthy Ariza, they're still better than the team that made the finals last year. Their road through the West was at least at easy as last year and 2X as easy in the finals. They would've won without Bynum.
    Yep. I agree that a 7 game series is always easy.

  24. #24
    Believe.
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Post Count
    230
    No, LA doesn't win without Bynum.

    He obviously wasn't 100% but him being there allowed Gasol to not play the 5 all game and LO not to play the 4 all game. They got wore down in the playoffs last year from the pounding. Also, his willingness to take hard fouls, even at the cost of PT, was a factor. Teams did think twice about attacking the basket when he was in. Not having an anchor is what caught them last year. There would have been a lot more perimeter players attacking the basket if Bynum wasn't there backing them up. Without Bynum - LA was forced to play a zone D that teams had figured out and started tearing it apart. Bynum as an anchor allowed more man-to-man principles.

    Getting caught up in stats instead of really understanding the game is why anyone would think Bynum was worthless to this team.
    So Bynum is paid to take fouls? Laker fans, have you ever thought that maybe he's not the next big thing that he's all hype up to be. I'll give him some credit, he'll be descent, but I don't see a future superstar.

  25. #25
    Laker Lover 2Cleva's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    1,842
    So Bynum is paid to take fouls? Laker fans, have you ever thought that maybe he's not the next big thing that he's all hype up to be. I'll give him some credit, he'll be descent, but I don't see a future superstar.
    Give him time. Considering how little PT he got in HS and no college and only 21. He has the potential nd teams know it.

    Paid for fouls? No - paid to contribute. Rebound. Defend the paint. Be an anchor for the defense. Phil was clear that's what he wanted out of him this year and he's did it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •