This is Steve Kerr we're talking about.
I understand how the system works. And they can trade their entire roster if they wish, taking on bad contract of talented players in the process. But they won't do that unless they can get somebody like Bron.
This is Steve Kerr we're talking about.
Sounds like Suns fans last year. It's like deja vu all over again.
So Cleveland is doing the same strategy as the Suns. "We're on top and fell short, but we suck against good teams, maybe Shaq can help us out". Who knows, maybe an older slower Shaq can do some good to the Cavs.
FUTURE IMPLOSION!![]()
how is that any different, or better than what the Cavs can do?
Thanks for the answer, I was curious on what Cavs fans thought.
its so simlar, its scary.
That's got nothing to do with what I was saying.
That the Cavs have Lebron right now and have not been doing that. Unless you think trading for Ben Wallace and his horrendous contract was a good move.
If the Suns got Shaq for nothing and got to keep Marion, they would have won it all in all in 2008.
quit comparing cleveland to the suns you morons
two COMPLETELY different teams and styles
shaq fits in a half court style (which cleveland plays)
shaq doesnt fit in a :07 or less style (which phoenix plays)
Yup, that was the other bandage trade I was referring to. Ferry's been trying to be like Pop and retool on the fly with bandages to fix holes.
However, Ferry's bandages have been terrible. Wally Szerbiak? Ben Wallace?
Shaq suckered the Suns and now he's suckered in the Cavs.
Do you think the trade for RJ was a bad one for the Spurs to make, too?
This needs to stop.
no, that was a great trade...for the Spurs.
Not really. Marion and his fragile ego would have imploded when D'Antoni was fired and he would have had to post Shaq every other possession. Phoenix did good in moving Marion.
Fortunately D'antoni wasn't fired till after the 2008 season. Maybe they wouldn't have won it all but they get by the Spurs if they have Marion to help defend the pick and roll.
Are you like some Mavs fans and their 'moral' 2006 championship? Just curious.
Wait a second...did ESPN just say that the Cavs got Shaq to stop the "Pick and Roll" of Orlando?
No not at all, that wasn't the point of my post. The point was you can't compare the two trades. The Suns traded one of their most important players for Shaq, Cleveland traded nothing.
I'll even laugh if they did.
they have one of the highest payrolls in the league, well over the cap. Ben Wallace was taking on a bad contract like you said the Knicks would do. Try again, this is fun
These ridiculous arguments about this being a bad trade for Cleveland. It's embarrassing. I call Spurs fans out when they rationalize and make insecure posts and that's exactly what lakerfan is doing in this thread. This is obviously a low risk high reward trade for the Cavs. There is nothing to debate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)