Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 41 of 41
  1. #26
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    I like to think of it as W, and W the sequel.

  2. #27
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,001

  3. #28
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    One of these days I'm going to make that my avatar.

  4. #29
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    12-18 hours? Lucky. I got friends who were working 24-48 hours with no real sleep.

    I will never complain about the military spending on individuals as even PFC's deserve more than they get paid, even while saying that they spend to much on some stuff.
    I'm not infantry, so I'm not working 24-48 hours in a row, thankfully. I think it's somewhat stupid that they allow soldiers to stay up for that long, as many studies have do ented that after so long without sleep, alertness, decision making and many other mental faculties become severely impaired.

    Still, the needs of the mission go on, and commanders must make do with what they have, so it happens.

  5. #30
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Cut by half seems a bit extreme.
    Very extreme. I cannot imagine such cuts. It would be devastating.

  6. #31
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    In what way would it be devastating?

  7. #32
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    If we cut military spending in half we could lower taxes and stimulate our economy, or better yet, fund things like education and healthcare.

    Given all the vested interests by various congressional members to keep jobs at bases and factories for their districts this is a total un-possibility though.

  8. #33
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    In what way would it be devastating?
    It would be devastating to those who live vicariously through US military actions.

  9. #34
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.
    Dwight D. Eisenhower

  10. #35
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    If we cut military spending in half we could lower taxes and stimulate our economy, or better yet, fund things like education and healthcare.

    Given all the vested interests by various congressional members to keep jobs at bases and factories for their districts this is a total un-possibility though.
    Wow... Cutting it in half would be what. about 2% of the budget? About about 0.5% of GNP, and Obama's budget is something like 25% of GNP.

    Right. It's really going to make a difference.

    I know. Lets cut social spending in half.

    Someone check my numbers. I didn't look it up, and I think I'm off a bit.

  11. #36
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.
    Dwight D. Eisenhower
    Leftist Emo Socialist...

  12. #37
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Wow... Cutting it in half would be what. about 2% of the budget? About about 0.5% of GNP, and Obama's budget is something like 25% of GNP.

    Right. It's really going to make a difference.

    I know. Lets cut social spending in half.

    Someone check my numbers. I didn't look it up, and I think I'm off a bit.
    $500 bil out of a $3 tril budget isn't 4%.

  13. #38
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,001
    Wow... Cutting it in half would be what. about 2% of the budget?
    2% of the federal budget isn't chump change.

    However, CBO shows defense outlays are 21% of the budget.

    Where'd you get your figure?



    I know. Lets cut social spending in half.
    Fine by me, but that ain't gonna happen either.

  14. #39
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Of course, the military can never be considered a part of "big government."

  15. #40
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    $500 bil out of a $3 tril budget isn't 4%.
    You're right. That should have been of GNP. Not of the budget.

  16. #41
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    2% of the federal budget isn't chump change.

    However, CBO shows defense outlays are 21% of the budget.

    Wild Cobra, [w]here'd you get your figure?


    Same place he gets most of his "facts". It rhymes with "his grass".

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •