Reply With Quote
There is not much evidence in this forum to support the conclusion that the campaign to suppress WC's opinion has been at all effective.
In fact, most of the evidence is against it.
Fair enough, WC.
God forbid we should somehow deprive you of your own opinion, wrong as it is likely to be.
Last edited by Winehole23; 07-01-2009 at 02:23 PM.
There is not much evidence in this forum to support the conclusion that the campaign to suppress WC's opinion has been at all effective.
In fact, most of the evidence is against it.
LOL. And the "face" of the Republicans is either Arnold --a bad actor who can barely formulate a sentence -- or Rush, a fat addict who has never worked a day in his life.
I do think it is funny and sort of embarrassing how easily it is for celebrities to get elected in this country. But that's not a party issue. That's an American issue. Apparently, we are so stupid we will vote for people just for being on TV or in People magazine, regardless of their actual qualifications.
Right, which is why it's preferable to limit the portion of our lives subject to the whims of the unwashed, reality show viewing masses.
So what type of executive experience are you talking about? I assume you would have to be fairly clear if you are going to amend the cons ution. So tell us WC... define executive experience...
whoop! whooop!
My bull factoid detector is going off. This sounds su iously like a talk-radio factoid retread, and not actual personal knowledge.
See, I was gonna let him have that, RG...
You can't get too caught up in the swirl of errata. In such a target rich environment, you can get distracted quite easily.
Whoop whoop...........really?
All you have to do is read the link I posted along with that statement.
And no, Mr. I'll jump to conclusions. I came up with that with my own search on "executive experience."
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 07-01-2009 at 06:11 PM.
That's too hard to say. Actually, I've been thinking it over. I don't want to see such a change to the cons ution. Considering only three people to date have become president without executive experience, the public seems to make rather good decisions there for the most part. In the case of President Obama, I don't believe he would have ever become president if he wasn't black. We had too large of a population that voted that way for that reason alone. White guilt from Caucasians, and Black pride. That is something that will not happen to the same degree again now that it's happened once.
Boy are you ever wrong! There is no way in that Arnold is the face of the republicans - that "R" after his name means absolutely nothing! And Rush is not the face of the republicans, but he is one of the faces of the conservative movement. However, you're wrong about him also. He's had plenty of jobs - in fact, he'll be the first to tell you how many times he was fired before he became a radio talkshow success. And he hasn't always worked in radio - he once worked for the Kansas City Royals.
And - he's no longer fat or an addict - so you FAIL on all accounts!!
Sigworthy.In the case of President Obama, I don't believe he would have ever become president if he wasn't black.
Good thing it didn't enbolden them, eh?We had too large of a population that voted that way for that reason alone. White guilt from Caucasians, and Black pride. That is something that will not happen to the same degree again now that it's happened once.
They are both entertainers..so how can one 'be like all democrats' and the other be 'one of the many' conservatives? Is this another one those hypocrital arguments you spout?Boy are you ever wrong! There is no way in that Arnold is the face of the republicans - that "R" after his name means absolutely nothing! And Rush is not the face of the republicans, but he is one of the faces of the conservative movement. However, you're wrong about him also. He's had plenty of jobs - in fact, he'll be the first to tell you how many times he was fired before he became a radio talkshow success. And he hasn't always worked in radio - he once worked for the Kansas City Royals.
And - he's no longer fat or an addict - so you FAIL on all accounts!!
Have you scrolled down on my sig?
I agree with Wild Cobra - Obama would've never been elected if he'd been white. I guess half-white doesn't count since he looks black.
Wow.
nice lookin' partner
Sure is, and 100% natural USA grown. Just took that pic and a few others on 6/29.
Is her belly as big as yours?
My default defeats yer sig, WC.
I'm good with whatever leering comments have been made thus far; I don't want a real clear picture and that's no reflection on your sweetie WC, but just my personal preference.
Ok?
There's enough towelsnapping and ripe underwear in this forum already, don't you think?
What do we need more locker room antics for? Doesn't this belong in The Club? It's boring and tacky, WC.
It could also be construed as disrespectful to your sweetie. Is she cool with it, Boss?
If it's a picture of a woman, does she live on a flaglot?
Well, notice the two who are acting all juvenile over it. I made it so one had to scroll down the pic wasn't in anyone's face. I only pointed it out after your "sigworthy" comment.
No doubt! 'Stuart saves his family' was hilarious!
Not really, even with their majorities their having a difficult time passing major legislation.It's done.. Sotomayer on the SC and the dems have 60 votes...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
