The question remains though: Does she know you are posting pictures of her on the internet, face or no?
I personally found it to be a bit tacky, but wasn't going to say anything.
Actually, he turns out to be right, according to the link he provided to a wiki article on the subject.
Very unlike WC to actually look up facts about things before having an opinion.
The question remains though: Does she know you are posting pictures of her on the internet, face or no?
I personally found it to be a bit tacky, but wasn't going to say anything.
LOL...
Like always, you misunderestimate me. I may be wrong at times, but I very rarely state something as fact without pretty solid evidence. I more often misspeak.
Does it matter? I removed it because of you crybabies. And yes, I had her permission. When I get a new ink cartridge, I'm making her prints of that one and the other eight I took of her. They are nice in 8 megapixil format. That was a 20% size.
Please tell me that was done intentionally.![]()
Yes, I did that purposely.
Thank goodness!![]()
I am liking your thinking more and more recently. That, or this is clearly a tongue-in-cheek reference to Mencken.
Self-ingratiating Forum
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)