oh ing please let dejuan blair be everything he was in college and then some if this ing is true.
Right. Gooden is exhibit A for not believing that stats determine a player's worth when you are looking for role players to help you win a championship.
oh ing please let dejuan blair be everything he was in college and then some if this ing is true.
him that would actually be intersting and could work bonner is from boston and had his best game of the season there, and u get two red heads on the team![]()
Would never happen since you can only have one minimally athletic, three point shooting, red headed pf on a team at one time.
depending on what that looked like the C's might match.
I don't think a S&T would work, since Boston is not really interested in trading him...
Well, we'll have to disagree. I'm not a big fan of Davis by any means, but I think his low post defence is top notch. Baby fights for position really hard and there haven't been many players in the league able to get a good spot down low when facing him. Duncan wasn't, for example. This is also a very common opinion among Celtics fans - even those who absolutely hate him, and are many, say his low post defence is the only skill he as at a top level.
Guys shoot over TD, maybe we should replace him.
Ducks actually said something insightful!
With the Haislip signing, given that he looks like an offensively-oriented 4 with some range (duplicating what Bonner has to offer), S&Ting Bonner for Davis makes sense for the Spurs. However, it doesn't make sense for the Celts unless they want an expiring contract, and I don't think they do.
Back to the drawing board.
They drafted one in spades.
well because boston only has the LLE dosent that mean the spurs offer just a little more than the LLE and boston wouldn't be able to match?
he is restricted so they can match any offer.
MB, who is that in your avatar? He looks like an Aussie racehorse trainer from the '50s...
he is their player that can go over cap to save him without using an exception
They have Early Bird Rights for him.
I think that the Celtics would be able to spend any amount that they wish, since Davis is a RFA.
lmao at you comparing Baby to Duncan. This also coming from the guy who said: "Baby for the MLE could be a steal, but I would only take Bass for the minimum".
well there is a salry cap so if they can spend as money they could on the player im pretty sure every resticted free agent on the team would end up getting staying
but early bird rights would mean on a resticted free agent?
That's the same thing people you say about John "Hot Plate" Williams. Who got the big deal and then promptly ate his way out of the NBA.
Getting young is not the goal. Getting younger and BETTER is. Baby could serve a purpose, but not a legit starter next to Duncan.
Spurs need a solid rebounder and defender who can alter shots.
But I guess because he is young and Duncan also has guys shooting over him, Davis is excellent![]()
That's not a direct quote, for starters. If you would like to quote me, do so accurately. That's minimal forum courtesy.
Further, the statement I made regarding Bass taking the minimum was in response to someone postulating that Bass could be had for the LLE. I responded that I'd like to see Bass take the minimum, but the NBA is a business and not a charity.
Now, I can understand if you are inebriated or just naturally dense that you couldn't figure that out.
And I only point out that Duncan doesn't stop all offensive players from shooting over him to point out the folly in the standard you presented for defensive ability.
Spurs FO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
They know what they're doing..doesn't matter if they sign Big Baby, McDyess, anyone...they know what they're doing, and they'll do what's best for this team...
Boston better sign this guy and match anything the spurs may throw at him.
They owe us spurs fans one after stealing 'Sheed
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)