Why can't you play it straight, Iggy?
Dishonest. And idiotic. Nobody ever claimed no one heard. The internet was buzzing.
This board was buzzing...you saw the bumped thread.
Why can't you play it straight, Iggy?
I told you to go bump the original thread for your ing link...you were obviously too ing stupid to figure out how to do that for yourself so I have now posted a link for you for the first time in probably 3 or 4 years mainly for the benefit of igkni...and of course you reacted just as I expected you would.
Ha ha.
So is the Huffington Post since they are being used as reliable sources by MSNBC.
The Huffington post recently had to pull a journal about making fun of Trig.
You expected me to disprove your claim that the mainstream media ran with the Bristol is Trig's mom rumor?
Neat.
No wonder you didn't want to try to argue it yourself. Now hours later your only hope is trying to argue the Kos was the mainstream media you were talking about all along.
Indeed.Ha ha.
Everybody can decide for himself. Holding out Kos as a mainstream source is tendentious.
You can't prove your point, you refuse to prove it, so you just fall back on lame definitions and over the top vulgarity.
How pathetic.
You mean the liberals can keep being liberals.
I don't what's funnier, the fact that you consider our more traditional news outless as bipartisan or the fact that even the ing partisan blog has remoced it and you don't think that's relevant to a lack of links(not that the links don't exist)Holding out Kos as a mainstream source is tendentious.
LOL. You either don't know what media means(and seem to be working under the impression that it must claim to be bipartisan) don't know what a journalist is, or consider your politics to be above your humanity...You can't prove your point, you refuse to prove it, so you just fall back on lame definitions and over the top vulgarity.
Pathetic is going after children, not cyberbutt ing the assholes that think it's funny.How pathetic.
Here's a search for my use of the word " " in this forum.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sear...archid=1422035
In truth, the list is shorter than I thought. It shouldn't take you long to thoroughly examine it, as your stated goal is to make me "melt down good."
Good luck!
I said Kos isn't traditional (MSM) media. The inference that MSM is bipartisan is yours and yours alone. I do not share it.
Why can't you play it straight, whottt?
Google caches almost everything, dummy. Somebody, somewhere saved the page. You were unable to back up your bs, as usual. Keep digging.
Who thinks it's funny?
I said upstream I think it was improper to go after Sarah Palin's kids. I certainly never went after them.
Are you still talking to me, whottt, or is this another stupid universalization?
I said National Media.
I do play it straight, if I see someone going after Obama's kids, I won't think it funny or that he deserved it. I also won't think he made props of them or pranced them out on stage.Why can't you play it straight, whottt?
Google is about as bipartisan as boutons is. That said, your're right, they did catch it, and I have repeatedly pointed out that the links are out there.Google caches almost everything, dummy.
But I can back it up...had it not been for the valiant but ultimately futile effort from ignki to have an intelligent discourse with you guys, you wouldn't have even gotten the kos link.Somebody, somewhere saved the page. You were unable to back up your bs, as usual. Keep digging.
I want you guys to post it, they are obviously there I am not lying, I just sat there and read them, once you post them and admit that they are exactly that, I'll believe you worth the effort of a civil discourse.
Well, hey, I'm sure Robert Byrd never burnt any negroes at the stake either, I guess that makes it alright. Oh wait a second...I forgot who I am arguing with.I said upstream I think it was improper to go after Sarah Palin's kids. I certainly never went after them.
Still here...Manumaniac was wrong when he said I come here to vent, if anything reading the crap here gives me a need to vent...I come here to procrastinate when I don't want to study for exams.Are you still talking to me, whottt, or is this another stupid universalization?
Yeah, I guess it's not like you could delete the offending posts or anything. You win that one. I'll remember that next time you and boutons are commiserating.
What do you want us to post?
The links that you have been asked to post?
That's a good one.
*Do my homework for me, then I'll respect you!*
Really, whottt, that's WC caliber argumentation.
God damn you are in full excuse mode tonight.
Please, o please ask a mod to look at the logs to see if I have deleted any posts. I said it was indeed possible, so I had no reason to delete anything. You just were so damn sure of yourself, I figured you knew when I did it.
, you didn't even try. Pathetic.You win that one.
You'll remember that you lost without even trying?I'll remember that next time you and boutons are commiserating.
Cool.
I never said I was 100% certain you said it....
I was
A. 100% certain that you spoke for the liberals on this forum when you asnswered my question of why ya'll attack her.
B. 100% certain that you have political kindred spirits on this very forum that have. And you've got absolutely problem with them doing it.
People do what they want. You want me to complain whenever someone calls Palin a ?
You don't even do that.
Don't add hypocrisy to the unprecedented lameness you are displaying tonight.
I posted a link. I posted the very first link I told you to go look up. It was a waste a time as I knew it would be, just as any further ones will also be...unlesss of course, you guys post them yourself. I'm telling you they are out there.
My link qualifies as National Media, it qualifies as world media, it's a got an audience of over a million people per week, potentially much larger, on the largest shared information source in the entire world, and professional journalists write for it. It practically qualifies as government media, as pointed earlier.
Too bad I had already found that link in another blog entry that I did post here and already knew that it didn't work anymore.
Go ahead and look for it.
It's there.
It would prove that you are not a complete .
Pointed out by whom?My link qualifies as National Media, it qualifies as world media, it's a got an audience of over a million people per week, potentially much larger, on the largest shared information source in the entire world, and professional journalists write for it. It practically qualifies as government media, as pointed earlier.
You?
You and your opinion are far less important than you think.
Please go and look for my link.
Prove yourself.
So then the Kos debunking is legit, whottt? It reached the same *national* audience, and the Democratic party poobahs behind Kos obviously wanted the debunking out there.
(Sorry for the edit, CD. You beat me to the punch again)
Nationally legit.
Professionally legit.
Millions of readers legit.
I'm doing it now, are you?
Tell you what, I'm not posting anymore ing links, why don't ya'll just post the original announcement of Bristol Palin's pregnancy by the McCain campaign, it'll give ya'll a chance to on a teenage girl again, which I know ya'll enjoy, and I think it'll clear things up sufficiently.
You must do it from now on, for any perceived sexist attack or perceived attack against children. And I'm talking any attack.
I'm not going to bother doing it myself, because my panties aren't bunched up about it like yours.
Why would it clear things up?Tell you what, I'm not posting anymore ing links, why don't ya'll just post the original announcement of Bristol Palin's pregnancy by the McCain campaign, it'll give ya'll a chance to on a teenage girl again, which I know ya'll enjoy, and I think it'll clear things up sufficiently.
Maybe you should post a link to it and explain why it would clear things up.
*I've tried nothing and I'm all out of ideas!*
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)