who will we sign with our LLE?

**coyotes_geek** · 07-10-2009

I don't understand how we aren't considering bringing Bruce back, or Kurt...damn I was a big fan of both...

Bruce needs to get cut first before we can consider bringing him back.

**coyotes_geek** · 07-10-2009

I think the Spurs will end up using a chunk of their LLE on Blair, probably something in the $600-$750 range, and then just not use the rest. Right now none of the guys who you could get for the LLE are worth the x2 luxury tax hit.

**dbestpro** · 07-10-2009

Bobby Jackson. (vet min)

**kobyz** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by Darkwaters

If you're going to sign a wing player I think it needs to be a defense-minded player. Theres only one ball to go around and we already have plenty of scorers on the wing:

Ginobili, Jefferson, Mason, Finley and McClinton are all primarily known as scorers. Why do we need another one?

because i dont believe in Mason and for the defense i hope we will bring Bruce

**loveforthegame** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by dbestpro

Bobby Jackson. (vet min)

I'd love it. I'm sure he could be had for the vet minimum and a chance to win a championship. As a Kings fan I'd hate to lose him but he'd be perfect for the Spurs and the 3rd pg option.

**dc_spursfan** · 07-10-2009

I don't know if the LLE is enough but Carney would be a nice choice. He is long,young, athletic and fine with not taking a bunch of shots.

**Ditty** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by dbestpro

Bobby Jackson. (vet min)

good thinking

**BlackBellamy** · 07-10-2009

Raef LaFrentz (vet min.)

**tp2021** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by BlackBellamy

Raef LaFrentz (vet min.)

What the dude

**BlackBellamy** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by tp2021

What the dude

Whew! I was waiting for someone to comment on that one. I was taking silence as the rest of the board agreeing.

**tp2021** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by BlackBellamy

Whew! I was waiting for someone to comment on that one. I was taking silence as the rest of the board agreeing.

I'm glad you were joking. I thought you were serious

**BlackBellamy** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by tp2021

I'm glad you were joking. I thought you were serious

Sorry for that.

I was trying to think of a truly worthless and injury prone free agent big who would also be redundant with our line-up. Like, the failingest fail I could fail with, y'know?

**Darkwaters** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by dbestpro

Bobby Jackson. (vet min)

Absolutely. Hes a vet with a lot of experience and poise. He can defend and shoot the 3. He'll probably take the minimum I think and would be a guy willing to take the bench and fill in when needed. But I think hes very capable when called upon. There are concerns about his health, but if we just keep him shelved until needed then it might not matter.

But if Hill were to have issues with the point position I think Bobby could fill in admirably.

**tp2021** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by BlackBellamy

Sorry for that.

I was trying to think of a truly worthless and injury prone free agent big who would also be redundant with our line-up. Like, the failingest fail I could fail with, y'know?

Maybe failing at failing makes you a winner? Or a super fail dunce, either way.

**BlackBellamy** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by tp2021

Maybe failing at failing makes you a winner? Or a super fail dunce, either way.

I'd say judging from your initial reaction, that I did an admirable job at failing.

**HarlemHeat37** · 07-10-2009

wayyyy too early for this..

let's look at how the young guys play in the Summer League first..and then wait until August, because there will still be a number of guys looking for contracts, and might play for cheaper than they'd usually be worth in better economic times..we could find a bargain..

SL first though..if some of them show a lot of potential, it might be better to just keep the $ in Holt's account..

**anonoftheinternets** · 07-10-2009

spend it on a veteren back up point ... what if hill is unable to produce.. we need some insurance there ... pg = parker / hill (unproven) .. sg = manu/ mason sf = rj, finley, PF/c = Duncan, mcdyess, bonner + young 'uns ....

**Spursfan092120** · 07-10-2009

Originally Posted by loveforthegame

I'd love it. I'm sure he could be had for the vet minimum and a chance to win a championship. As a Kings fan I'd hate to lose him but he'd be perfect for the Spurs and the 3rd pg option.

3rd my ass...he'd be the backup...Jacque Vaughn ain't any better than him...Pop wants Hill as a 2 guard, and McClinton is the same...