The Mavericks let one man beat them. lol Dirk Nowitzki. Fraud franchise player.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvkKdXLwt0U&feature=fvw
Dok, bro i think you have the right just like Ghazi to argue that the suns where the best team in 2007 and should have won the Championship....
I think the Suns-Spurs series officiating in 2007 is just as bad as the Heat-Mavericks officiating in 2006.
With all honesty here... 2006 Dallas Mavericks and 2007 Phoenix Suns are the Real Champions![]()
The Mavericks let one man beat them. lol Dirk Nowitzki. Fraud franchise player.
Mavs won in 2006. Games 3, 5, and 6 were tainted by lopsided officiating. You can overcome one game of bad officiating, but not ing 3.
You're also forgetting our 1993-1995 3-peat that was robbed due to a "fluke" Paxson and Mario Elie shot.
People can bash on Nash, Stoudemire, and the Suns Run and Gun offense... but they were CLEARLY the best team in 2007, and were robbed of a championship. Think of how different those players would be viewed on internet boards today if they had won that year.
Don't worry, once Nash is gone and the Suns can dedicate 2 full seasons to the tankapalooza, we'll have another 3 peat.
lol 5 > 4
lol Dirk quitting midway through the Warriors series
lol 39% shooting
lol Dirk losing to an eighth seed
lol blowing 10 point leads in the fourth quarter
lol sissy team that can't even intentionally foul
The Mavericks are so bad, they will let a fraud franchise player get a quadruple double on them one day.
lol hornets
lol Mavs
Man, this is fun! Now I know why you like talking trash to any and every Hornets fan who posts here. This is fun!
lol
I could made a video of that same game making it seem like the Spurs were robbed by the refs, besides half of the calls made on those plays were good calls.
Oh and while we're at it let's crown the Kings as 2002 NBA champions
In all seriousness I think the Suns lost the series on their own, but lets not pretend the refs were doing the Suns any favors. If one team got the better end of the officiating stick in that series, it was undoubtedly San Antonio. The ref who's currently in jail agrees with me.
Hey, at least the Suns didn't choke and lose to a one man team four times straight.
Alright thats cool with me..
While we at it, Spurs 1999 Championship doesnt count so we can take that away from them since it was a lock-out season.. Not deserving, to be able to be named as of deserved Champs, they needed to play 82 games not 35..
![]()
If the SUNS could've at least forced a game 7 i'd put more credence into my team getting bent over by the suspensions.........but they had the SPURS beat in game 5 and let Bowen beat 'em from the corner.
Then we we got our guys back,went to S.A. and D'Umbtoni'd ourselves into an early summer.
I'm over it.
Not quite over Paxson's ing dagger yet though.....
Please. They wouldn't have won. If they were so clearly the best team in the league, they would have pushed it to a seventh game instead of quitting.
Besides, who gives a . It was two years ago.
Lets just crown the Suns champions from 1993-2000. God Knows if they got the #1 overall pick and drafted D-Rob instead of Armen Giliam the following team would have dominated the 90's:
Robinson
Barkley
Richard Dumas (Robinson would have taken him to church and kept him off drugs)
Dan Majerle
Kevin Johnson
![]()
Actually it was 50 games, moron.
The Lakers could have had a 4-peat if it wasn't for that stupid lock-out season in 1999.
That's still not 82 games, Genius.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)