Reply With Quote
What about gene modification?
I hope we can all agree that all humans are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the fruits of their labor.
All governments should be cons uted to protect these rights; adjudicate arguments arising from a violation of these rights; and establishing common services that benefit the whole population governed...distributing the cost of that burden by fair taxation with representation.
I believe that just about covers it.
What about gene modification?
What about it?
Just throwing it out there.
I think the legalization of MJ probably is legitimate common ground. I know a lot of people that support the legalization of MJ that are not people you would normally expect, including a ton of cops. Pretty much every cop I've ever known.
I think very few people consider it to be more dangerous than alcohol and should be illegal while alchohol isn't.
Legalizing weed - yes.
I would be for a conditional loser pays. Only if the jury or judge decides that the loser is outrageous. And if there is a limitation on costs. A big corporation can run up (make up) enormous costs.
How about eliminating gerrymandering?
There's the kicker, yes corporations might place 100 lawyers on a case where a person may have one. I can see limiting the loser pay to to a reasonable level, but without the possibility of loss, some people sue just because they can sue.
Gerrymandering. Yes.
Now there will still be questions on how to set the borders, but let's keep them reasonable.
Water is wet, sky is blue. Santa Claus is real.
'Bout it.
Would everyone agree that I'm a mother er?
I thought you went in more for exotic dancers, WC.
I have dated several. Most are single mothers....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
