Couldn't help but notice how many times Kobe is on those all defensive teams. yech
Huh? Nice article there, but that doesn't have anything to do with Avery's number being retired. There were gobs of fans who disagreed with AJ's number retirement and who still dislike it. I think it was Pop who really pushed for it, and his reasons are not without merit. Anyway, this is getting off topic a bit. I think Bruce is very worthy of having his number up in the rafters, regardless of whether AJ is already up there. In a couple of years. Maybe retire some other numbers first. I'm just saying, if AJ is up there, there is less argument against retiring BB, IMO.
Couldn't help but notice how many times Kobe is on those all defensive teams. yech
Yep...and Tim Duncan and KG are on it every year.
That site has no No. 16 and spelled it "Colby Deitrick."
Whatever it says can't be taken seriously.
#16 Mike Gale.Combined with Bowen
Love Bruce but NO. He was/is a defensive specialist. He was a good three point shooter because he was so poor an offensive player other teams left him alone more often than not. He is not high profile outside of San Antonio but Avery became that with his stint in Dallas. I don't agree that AJ should be so honored and I don't think Bruce should be either. One wrong doesn't justify another.
Should a player that averaged 9.4 ppg, 7.4 apg, and 3 rpg and no championships and virtually no profile outside of San Antonio have his Spurs' number retired?
Should a player that averaged 6.5 ppg 3rpg 1.5 apg that rode along for 3 championships. He was a great defender on a great defensive team. To say without Bruce we only have one championship or one less is bull . Maybe Detroit doesn't win without Ben Wallace.
What would've happened had the Spurs kept Stephen Jackson? i'm not saying instead of Bowen but starting
So you guys really think that players that ONLY play offense should get their numbers retired, but players that only play defense shouldn't?..it really doesn't make any sense when you consider the level of the defensive player we're talking about here..
Rode along? You clearly haven't watched him play. Damn. Without Bruce we don't win in 2005 and 2007.
Defensive players whose jerseys aren't retired
Dennis Rodman Pistons? Back to back defensive player of the year along with nba les.
Michael Cooper Lakers? Defensive player of the year 5x nba champion
Last edited by jay014; 07-27-2009 at 06:51 PM.
I know wrong choice
Bull !regardless
You made the comparison not me. I just stated his accomplishments. Which are many. Very many.
Did I ever say that Bowen was great at all aspects of defense? It is simply a ridiculous assumption to say that one person is great at every single aspect of defense. As great as Robinson and Olajuwon was at defense, they were not great at every single aspect of defense.
And I find it curious that you listed the big man aspects of defense when you are evaluating a rail thin 6’7” small forward. That is like saying Tim Duncan is not a good 3 pt shooter, and there are aspects on offense in which Duncan was nothing special at.
Seriously, I don’t. I would imagine it is very very hard, but I don’t. I would also imagine winning the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th are also very hard. Are you trying to say that winning the 2003, 2005 and 2007 championships are somehow less difficult than the 99 championship?
And why would I ask teams who couldn’t win a championship how hard it is to win a championship? They probably don’t know either.
Finally, you are basically saying that Avery Johnson deserves it because he was the starting point guard. What does that have to do with it? Watch the 99 team, the offense goes through the twin towers. The leadership was shared by Avery Johnson and David Robinson (as captains), Mario Elie brought the fire. To say that Avery Johnson ran the show on the 99 team was misleading at the very least.
Avery Johnson was a role player too. Did you mistook him for a superstar?
And saying that players are the same because they are role players is just blind. Take the 2003 team, Stephen Jackson was a role player on that team. Compare him, to say Kevin Willis, who was also a role player. Their contributions were certainly quite different.
Comparing Rose’s defense on Shaq and Dirk to the defense Bowen played on Kobe is simply laughable. Bowen was the primary defender on Kobe Bryant almost every time, Malik, was at best, a bit defender on Shaq and Dirk, and most time as the double teamer.
I took Kobe Bryant's stats vs. Bowen since the 2002-03 season, because they played more head to head games since due to Bowen being on the Spurs and playing each other more during the playoffs.
Kobe Bryant scores 27.2 ppg and shot 42.6%, 6.9 FTA and only 28.6% from 3 pt land against Bowen.
Between 2002 and 2009, Kobe Bryant scored an average of 28.73 points on 45.46% from the field, with 8.78 FTA and 32.5% from 3 pt land. Bryant shot a lower % with less FTA against Bowen, who, from 2002 to at least 2004, was only single covering Bryant, while Bryant scored more points, at a better %, with more FTA against other teams, who mostly double or even triple teams him. And you are trying to argue Bowen defense on Bryant had minimal results and simply made him work hard?
I don’t think the Bulls are retiring Bowen’s numbers either, I don’t think Bowen deserves that.
EDIT: Do you know why Jerry Sloan had his # retired?
Why is that? You put such ridiculously high value on one shot by Avery Johnson. Why are last minute championship winning defensive plays not important?
Last edited by ambchang; 07-27-2009 at 09:18 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)