Well, I think it would have looked a lot like the bailout initially, but saved money over time, with the added value of cleaning up the banking system and teaching a lesson.
We're going in circles here. You only need the big ones to fail (which happened to be the ones with the toxic assets) to cascade into the entire system.
Also, what do you call a temporary hit? What are we talking about here? 4 years of recession? 10 years? What's your number for a temporary hit?
Well, I think it would have looked a lot like the bailout initially, but saved money over time, with the added value of cleaning up the banking system and teaching a lesson.
I don't know what his reason was. I have stated in the past that I though he was given bad advice from his Treasury Chairman. It was others claiming we had to act fast. I also think because it was the end of his term, he just rubber stamped what congress wanted. If it goes awry, blame congress. If he vetoed it, he would have surely been blamed for this situation for not acting. He was stuck between a rock and a hard place. If it were me, I would have vetoed it.
I disagree.
We would have recovered by now I think. As it is, this will last for some time still.
I really, honestly, don't think you have the slightest idea of what you're talking about. But I'm not here to convince you of anything, so I'll leave it to 'agree to disagree'.
You are lost.
You are lost. That's classic Wild Cobra boilerplate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)